On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:45:32PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Paul W. Frields
<stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
>> I'm curious to know how *Red Hat* products
>> could depend on EPEL packages though EPEL
>> is *not* supported by Red Hat.
>
> This is not a valid assumption from what the OP said. An installation
> tool as he suggested could be independent of the product.
May I ask what is the legal concern here? Is there a legal issue I'm missing?
I just see EPEL policy questions really.
I don't see a clear legal question either, which I think is why
someone asked previously for some more details. I see a packaging
guidelines question as well as EPEL policy.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com