28 Jan
2009
28 Jan
'09
2:54 p.m.
On 2009-01-28 at 8:41:39 -0500, "Nicolas Mailhot" nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net wrote:
However if you don't you'll have to deal with the directory ownership of the common font directory (I purposefully didn't want to open this particular can of worm) and other common files.
Also documentation can be bulky, especially when upstream provides in in pdf or .doc form with embedded bitmaps of what the font looks like.
Well, it seems like there wouldn't be much of a case to obsolete -common in that scenario, just move the license into each subpackage.
~spo