APSL 1.0 is listed in Bad Licenses. Is this because it is non-free, or because it was deprecated and replaced (latest version of the license is APSL 2.0) ?
I had a look at the license text[1] and it seems like clause 2.1 would make it non-free. But I'm no expert on this stuff ...
[1] http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.0.txt
Rich.
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:43 +0000 "Richard W.M. Jones" rjones@redhat.com wrote:
APSL 1.0 is listed in Bad Licenses. Is this because it is non-free, or because it was deprecated and replaced (latest version of the license is APSL 2.0) ?
I had a look at the license text[1] and it seems like clause 2.1 would make it non-free. But I'm no expert on this stuff ...
See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/historical-apsl.html
- RF
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:53:49AM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:43 +0000 "Richard W.M. Jones" rjones@redhat.com wrote:
APSL 1.0 is listed in Bad Licenses. Is this because it is non-free, or because it was deprecated and replaced (latest version of the license is APSL 2.0) ?
I had a look at the license text[1] and it seems like clause 2.1 would make it non-free. But I'm no expert on this stuff ...
See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/historical-apsl.html
Interesting, thanks.
Rich.
-
Richard Fontana -
Richard W.M. Jones