Hello license folks. I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX: python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU Is this support tracked somewhere? I know openSUSE already uses SPDX, so rpmlint probably knows how to read that. Right?

On 31. 08. 22 13:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> Hello license folks. >> >> I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX: >> >> python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause >> python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU >> >> Is this support tracked somewhere? I know openSUSE already uses SPDX, so >> rpmlint probably knows how to read that. Right? >> > > rpmlint only knows what licenses we tell it, and the Fedora rpmlint > policy has not been updated yet because we want the > fedora-license-data package to produce the necessary TOML file that > rpmlint will source rather than me maintaining another copy of this. > > rpmlint will handle both Fedora style and SPDX license tags once we > have that data file in place. Great. Is this the file? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/blob/rawhide/f/licenses.toml What's needed? Move this file to licenses-legacy.toml and install licenses.toml from fedora-license-data? I can do that.

Hello license folks. I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX: python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU Is this support tracked somewhere? I know openSUSE already uses SPDX, so rpmlint probably knows how to read that. Right?