Hi,
For the following review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
I would need to know if the "Non Related Persons Disclaimer and Licence" under which the CAcert root certificates files are is acceptable for Fedora or not. Full text here : http://www.cacert.org/policy/NRPDisclaimerAndLicence.php
What I see is that it only really applies to liability, and doesn't cover modifications since those wouldn't make much sense. What does bother me somewhat is the last part of the "License" section : "You may NOT distribute certificates or root keys under this licence, nor make representation about them." as well as the fact that liability might be transferred to the Fedora Project if the certificates are shipped in the distribution.
IANAL and I found nothing relevant in the "Licensing" wiki page, which is why I'm posting here.
Matthias
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:57 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
Hi,
For the following review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549
I would need to know if the "Non Related Persons Disclaimer and Licence" under which the CAcert root certificates files are is acceptable for Fedora or not. Full text here : http://www.cacert.org/policy/NRPDisclaimerAndLicence.php
What I see is that it only really applies to liability, and doesn't cover modifications since those wouldn't make much sense. What does bother me somewhat is the last part of the "License" section : "You may NOT distribute certificates or root keys under this licence, nor make representation about them." as well as the fact that liability might be transferred to the Fedora Project if the certificates are shipped in the distribution.
Yeah, so this would be a Content license rather than a software license. Given that it does not give permission for us to redistribute (the cornerstone requirement for Content licenses), this license is not acceptable for Fedora.
~spot
"TC" == Tom "spot" Callaway <Tom> writes:
TC> Given that it does not give permission for us to redistribute (the TC> cornerstone requirement for Content licenses), this license is not TC> acceptable for Fedora.
I guess I'm glad I looked before approving the package, but I have to wonder: Do the cacert folks actually want anyone to use their certificates? I mean, this prevents basically everyone from using them, because they can't come with the OS or the browser.
- J<