Hello, My team would like to open-source our testing tool for Anaconda. Currently it’s using our custom XML namespace with Red Hat URI. We think it would be best to change it to fedoraproject.org. Is there some kind of process for reserving/registering it for our tool? Or are we free coming up with some URI like: "http://fedoraproject.org/anaconda-testing/tool-name/recipe" <http://fedoraproject.org/anaconda-testing/tool-name/recipe> and using that as our namespace? Thank you. -- Zdenek Veleba Quality Engineer Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> Location: RH - Brno - TPB-C - 1C373 <https://red.ht/sig> _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 02:36:43PM +0100, Zdenek Veleba wrote: > Hello, > > My team would like to open-source our testing tool for Anaconda. > Currently it’s using our custom XML namespace with Red Hat URI. We > think it would be best to change it to fedoraproject.org. Is there > some kind of process for reserving/registering it for our tool? Or > are we free coming up with some URI like: > "http://fedoraproject.org/anaconda-testing/tool-name/recipe" and > using that as our namespace? It's probably safer to go with something like http://anaconda-testing.fedoraproject.org/tool-name/recipe to avoid cluttering the fedoraproject.org/* space with things we need to keep up with forever even if we change what that site runs on or points to.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:36:15AM +0100, Zdenek Veleba wrote: > We've already decided on > "http://fedoraproject.org/anaconda/anabot/recipe/[variant]/[version]". > I've also talked about it with Anaconda developers and they seem to like > it. I think that the chance the URL will work and point to something > irrelevant in the future is very small. It's not a legal concern, but I think it's a reasonable practical one. Can you please file a ticket with Fedora Infrastructure https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues to validate which would be less ongoing maintenance? Thanks.