On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 01:38:33PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:23:29PM -0700, Link Dupont wrote:
> I like the *idea* of an article covering various things to do after
> installation, but the content of this article in particular is a miss
> for me.
I've been thinking about this a bit. We want Fedora to be an amazing
out-of-the-box experience. The answer to "What should you do after you
install Fedora?" should be "Get to work (or play)!"
Of course, there are some things we can't do (because we're restricted
by patents or similar), some things we won't do (because we stick to
our free software foundation), and some things we just don't wanna do
(replace apps we've chosen with apps someone else happens to like).
It's fine for third parties to write articles about what *they* would
like to do about some of these things, but it doesn't seem right for
the official magazine to do so.
Right, it seems like the content could easily cross into things that
people should write on their individual blogs. As an official source,
the Magazine should use caution when endorsing vs. informing.
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
- - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com