On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:33:32PM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote:
On 10/11/2016 10:05 AM, Eduard Lucena wrote:
> Hi Marketing and Magazine teams,
>
> Since we decided to split Magazine from Marketing, having Magazine ML and
> IRC Channel separate from Marketing (Marketing meeting for August 30, 2016)
> we were working really fine. But now we hit a stone, Magazine have no
> Pagure or trac to follow tickets/issues.
>
> For now, we are working with Marketing Pagure, and we have 3 issues related
> to the Magazine:
> 208, 233, and 239.
>
> The idea with this mail is to discuss with both teams if we should split
> magazine's issues from Marketing Pagure, being Magazine still a subproject
> of Marketing.
>
> Br,
>
Hey Eduard, thanks for starting this thread. I'll rehash what I said in the
meeting, but I think that a Pagure repository specific to the Fedora
Magazine isn't necessary. Even though the Magazine is still a little more
split off from Fedora Marketing, I believe that it is still a
"sub-sub-project" of Marketing. A lot of interests that Marketing may have
now and in the future may be of interest for the Fedora Magazine.
I also think a Trac just for the Magazine won't be heavily used. Anything
technical can be filed on the Fedora Infrastructure Pagure, and Magazine
editors can take a look on the Fedora Marketing Pagure too (there's a fair
bit of overlap).
This is my 2¢ but I'm open to what others think would work best or is least
confusing.
I would think we could get by with "magazine" tagged issues for now,
given the volume. If that were to change, hopefully that means a good
problem to have. ;-)
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com