> Yes, and it's useful to have those published on the site so that readers understand the terms under which can reuse/remix the content. I think Joe was coming a bit more from the "contribution" angle, though of course the contribute and use terms need to line up.
>So we def. need to get the terms of use back on - and make sure that we're verifying somehow that people submitting content are aware of the license under which >they're submitting or have signed the FPCA or etc.
>IANAL, and all that jazz.