On 27 July 2016 at 12:00, Justin W. Flory <jflory7(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 07/26/2016 10:22 AM, pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On 29 June 2016 at 22:10, Justin W. Flory <jflory7(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:jflory7@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 06/28/2016 11:35 PM, pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:pravin.d.s@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29 June 2016 at 02:13, Justin W. Flory <jflory7(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:jflory7@gmail.com>
> <mailto:jflory7@gmail.com <mailto:jflory7@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> On 06/27/2016 11:33 AM, pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:pravin.d.s@gmail.com>
> <mailto:pravin.d.s@gmail.com <mailto:pravin.d.s@gmail.com>>
>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am just wondering how can we promote improvement in
> Fedora
> 24 from
> G11N side. We have already drafted major points in Wiki.
> [1]
> Do you think having post in Magazine good here? Any
> other
> ideas? :)
>
> Thanks,
> Pravin Satpute
>
>
>
>
1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/G11N/Fedora_24_Talking_points
> (Created
> new page, since General talk page was more on products
> side and
> IMO G11N
> was not fitting well into it.)
>
>
> Hey Pravin!
>
> Regarding your original idea, are you meaning to say you'd
> like to
> get feedback from everyday users about translations and
> feedback in
> Fedora to see their opinions?
>
>
> That will be great, to get these kind of feedback. Presently we
> are very
> much dependent on testing day and bugzilla.
>
>
>
> Looking at the wiki page, it seems like more of an update on
> the
> internationalization / globalization efforts going on in
> Fedora,
> which is awesome! For this data, though, I would probably
> publish on
> the Community Blog instead of the Magazine. We could
> probably do a
> short "pointer" post on the Magazine to the CommBlog article
> to
> increase some outside exposure from users there too.
>
>
> Actually, i was interested to tweak this information from magazine
> perspective but agree with you by saying present contents suits to
> communityblog :)
> I will prepare first draft, may be this week and then we can
> again think
> again about suitability. I am happy with both case (Magazine or
> Communityblog with pointer in Magazine)
>
> Thanks,
> Pravin Satpute
>
>
> I think either way would work well. Depending on the angle you want
> to take (or maybe even both), we could try putting out an article
> about this on either platform. If you want to write something up on
> one platform, we can always port to the other one fairly easily.
>
> Drop us a line once you're ready for it to be reviewed. :)
>
>
> Took must more time than expected :(
> Post is ready in pitch state now.
https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13838
> Let me know your review about it :)
> May be need more cleanup.
>
> Thanks,
> Pravin Satpute
>
>
Unless another editor tackles it before me, I'll make sure this one gets
brought up at our regular meeting time on Thursday. Thanks for working on
this, Pravin! :)
I had quick discussion with Paul on this. We need to think more on G11N
article for FedoraMagazine.
I will move this article to CommunityBlog soon.
Thanks Justin :)
-
Pravin