I vote for #1. The infatructure is already in place, the overhead is taken care of. I'm a fan of keeping it simple, and not fixing things that aren't broken :) Changing the mailing list infastructure just for nominal reasons seems pointless and will only serve to create more work for others :)
Regards,
  Steve

On 12/2/05, Thomas Chung <tchung@fedoranews.org> wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:40:46 -0500 (EST), Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote
> OK, so we need to come to a decision on how Fedora mailing lists will work
> as we grow, because we're starting to get requests from various folks to
> start them up.
>
> We've got the following options to consider:
>
> 1. Continuing to host mailing lists at Red Hat.  This is the easiest
> option, and considering that Red Hat sponsors lots of mailing lists, no
> big deal, really.  We've got a good infrastructure for getting them
> created relatively quickly.
>
> 2. Move mailing lists to fedoraproject.org.  Other than independence from
> redhat.com, what does this buy us?  What is this independence from
> redhat.com worth?  And is Seth even willing/able to maintain this?
>
> 3. Have mailing lists anywhere and everywhere; whoever wants to set up a
> mailing list can set up a mailing list, and we can link them all and note
> them as "authoritative project list" or not as we see fit.
>
> Let's get some answers, and quick.  I've got 3 requests for mailing lists
> @redhat.com waiting on the burner.
>
> --g
>
> _____________________  ____________________________________________
>   Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
>  Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
>              Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
>                      ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan

I vote for #2. :)

--
Thomas Chung
FedoraNEWS.ORG (http://fedoranews.org)
"..where you can free your knowledge for your free community!"

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list