On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:19:01AM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
The most important requirement from a technical point of view is to
have
the images big enough, so depending on the paper size we may want to
resuest something like at least 4 or 5 Megapixels (multiply the page
size in inches with 300 DPI and we get the minimum resolution needed in
pixels).
I think to give us more freedom we'll want to ask for photos that could
theoretically fill the entire page, but we might put more than one photo
on a page (in some format... hmm) to break some things up and put room
for text.
We can also talk about file formats and require either RAW or JPEG
with
a high quality, we have to accept JPEG as not all cameras are capable of
producing RAW, but a JPEG saved with a quality factor of 85 (with
visible JPEG artefacts) is unacceptable, so we may go with something
like at least 98.
Can we just ask people to place the quality settings on their camera to
the highest possible?
Not sure about post-processing, like some noise reduction, sharpening
or
color adjustments: we'll do this ourselves for the selected images or
require the submitter to to it. I feel more inclined for doing it
ourselves, as it will allow contributions from more people.
I don't think we can list requirements from an artistic point of view
(quality, composition), as those are hard to define. This is where we
will have to make the selection from the submitted pool.
Right. How about we ask people to submit multiple shots?
I'm thinking I'm going to need to create a workflow of some sort for all
of this...
--
Ian Weller <ianweller(a)gmail.com>
http://ianweller.org
GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
"Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet."
~ Douglas Adams