Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2018-11-29 17:00 - 18:00
UTC)
by James Antill
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 17:00:11 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-11-29/fpc.2018-11...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:00:12)
* Schedule (geppetto, 17:09:13)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZDZVTB3TUYZQGUTEGMA5377OR54VOCO2/
(geppetto, 17:09:14)
* #806 Guideline change procedure should be updated for PRs (geppetto,
17:09:25)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Guideline_Change_Procedure
(tibbs, 17:11:45)
* Decided on a week or two ago, need to open issues if there's
anything to vote on. (geppetto, 17:12:23)
* #830 Update Python manual byte compilation rules (geppetto, 17:12:37)
* ACTION: Update Python manual byte compilation rules (+1:6, 0:0,
-1:0) (geppetto, 17:16:55)
* #834 Multilib file conflict (geppetto, 17:17:18)
* Main problem is that DNF is much happier than yum to let foo.x86_64
and foo.i686 be different versions (geppetto, 17:22:55)
* Working around this in packages is generally agreed to be insane
(geppetto, 17:23:23)
* The yum option is "protected_multilib". (tibbs, 17:29:11)
* ACTION: There's nothing useful FPC can do here, there are multiple
options to fix the dnf/rpm stack and we encourage the developers to
implement one (geppetto, 17:30:22)
* #832 Proposal for version guideline overhaul (including tilde)
(geppetto, 17:30:39)
* Tibbs minimal proposal for tilde in versioning (+1:4, 0:0, -1:0)
(geppetto, 17:53:39)
* ACTION: More voting in the ticket, or another week (geppetto,
17:53:48)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 17:53:51)
Meeting ended at 17:59:24 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Update Python manual byte compilation rules (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
* There's nothing useful FPC can do here, there are multiple options to
fix the dnf/rpm stack and we encourage the developers to implement one
* More voting in the ticket, or another week
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* Update Python manual byte compilation rules (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
* There's nothing useful FPC can do here, there are multiple options
to fix the dnf/rpm stack and we encourage the developers to
implement one
* More voting in the ticket, or another week
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* geppetto (66)
* tibbs (52)
* ignatenkobrain (40)
* zodbot (16)
* decathorpe (15)
* limburgher (6)
* redi (2)
* nim (1)
* handsome_pirate (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
5 years, 4 months
james's meeting titled "fpc" ended in #fedora-meeting-1
by notifications＠fedoraproject.org
Notification time stamped 2018-11-29 17:59:24 UTC
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 17:00:11 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-11-29/fpc.2018-11...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:00:12)
* Schedule (geppetto, 17:09:13)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproje...
(geppetto, 17:09:14)
* #806 Guideline change procedure should be updated for PRs (geppetto,
17:09:25)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Guideline_Change_Proce...
(tibbs, 17:11:45)
* Decided on a week or two ago, need to open issues if there's
anything to vote on. (geppetto, 17:12:23)
* #830 Update Python manual byte compilation rules (geppetto, 17:12:37)
* ACTION: Update Python manual byte compilation rules (+1:6, 0:0,
-1:0) (geppetto, 17:16:55)
* #834 Multilib file conflict (geppetto, 17:17:18)
* Main problem is that DNF is much happier than yum to let foo.x86_64
and foo.i686 be different versions (geppetto, 17:22:55)
* Working around this in packages is generally agreed to be insane
(geppetto, 17:23:23)
* The yum option is "protected_multilib". (tibbs, 17:29:11)
* ACTION: There's nothing useful FPC can do here, there are multiple
options to fix the dnf/rpm stack and we encourage the developers to
implement one (geppetto, 17:30:22)
* #832 Proposal for version guideline overhaul (including tilde)
(geppetto, 17:30:39)
* Tibbs minimal proposal for tilde in versioning (+1:4, 0:0, -1:0)
(geppetto, 17:53:39)
* ACTION: More voting in the ticket, or another week (geppetto,
17:53:48)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 17:53:51)
Meeting ended at 17:59:24 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Update Python manual byte compilation rules (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
* There's nothing useful FPC can do here, there are multiple options to
fix the dnf/rpm stack and we encourage the developers to implement one
* More voting in the ticket, or another week
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* Update Python manual byte compilation rules (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
* There's nothing useful FPC can do here, there are multiple options
to fix the dnf/rpm stack and we encourage the developers to
implement one
* More voting in the ticket, or another week
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* geppetto (66)
* tibbs (52)
* ignatenkobrain (40)
* zodbot (16)
* decathorpe (15)
* limburgher (6)
* redi (2)
* nim (1)
* handsome_pirate (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-11-29/fpc.2018-11...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...
5 years, 4 months
Fedora Release Engineering Meeting Summary for 2018-11-29
by Mohan Boddu
======================================
#fedora-meeting-2: RELENG (2018-11-29)
======================================
Meeting started by mboddu at 17:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available
athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2018-11-29/releng.20...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* #7922 Build Fedora 29 Python Classroom Lab (mboddu, 17:02:53)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7922 (mboddu, 17:02:59)
* RelEng decided to rebuild Python Classroom artifacts for F29 GA
(mboddu, 17:07:56)
* #7921 setgid bit on Fedora 29 directories (mboddu, 17:08:29)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7921 (mboddu, 17:08:35)
* mboddu will remove the sticky bit but we dont know how it got
created in first place (mboddu, 17:13:36)
* Changing the meeting time (mboddu, 17:14:23)
* mboddu will send whenisgood or framadate later with some new times
for this meeting (mboddu, 17:19:13)
* Open Floor (mboddu, 17:22:19)
* nirik planning to move builders to F29 after he finishes his current
work on openstack (mboddu, 17:22:27)
Meeting ended at 17:35:39 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* mboddu (65)
* nirik (23)
* dustymabe (17)
* zodbot (8)
* tyll (0)
* puiterwijk (0)
* masta (0)
* Kellin (0)
* pbrobinson (0)
* pingou (0)
* maxamillion (0)
* sharkcz (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
5 years, 4 months
mohanboddu's meeting titled "RELENG (2018-11-29)" ended in
#fedora-meeting-2
by notifications＠fedoraproject.org
Notification time stamped 2018-11-29 17:35:39 UTC
======================================
#fedora-meeting-2: RELENG (2018-11-29)
======================================
Meeting started by mboddu at 17:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2018-11-29/releng.2018...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* #7922 Build Fedora 29 Python Classroom Lab (mboddu, 17:02:53)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7922 (mboddu, 17:02:59)
* RelEng decided to rebuild Python Classroom artifacts for F29 GA
(mboddu, 17:07:56)
* #7921 setgid bit on Fedora 29 directories (mboddu, 17:08:29)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7921 (mboddu, 17:08:35)
* mboddu will remove the sticky bit but we dont know how it got
created in first place (mboddu, 17:13:36)
* Changing the meeting time (mboddu, 17:14:23)
* mboddu will send whenisgood or framadate later with some new times
for this meeting (mboddu, 17:19:13)
* Open Floor (mboddu, 17:22:19)
* nirik planning to move builders to F29 after he finishes his current
work on openstack (mboddu, 17:22:27)
Meeting ended at 17:35:39 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* mboddu (65)
* nirik (23)
* dustymabe (17)
* zodbot (8)
* tyll (0)
* puiterwijk (0)
* masta (0)
* Kellin (0)
* pbrobinson (0)
* pingou (0)
* maxamillion (0)
* sharkcz (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2018-11-29/releng.2018...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...
5 years, 4 months
gundalow's meeting titled "Ansible Community PR Review" ended in
#ansible-community
by notifications＠fedoraproject.org
Notification time stamped 2018-11-29 17:25:33 UTC
===============================================
#ansible-community: Ansible Community PR Review
===============================================
Meeting started by gundalow at 09:00:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-community/2018-11-29/ansible_co...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Thank you all that are here, for out first (of many?) big PR review
days. The aim is to 1) give new community members a place to learn and
understand Ansible's review (and merge) process 2) Improve the docs
and process 3) Give some PR love 4) Identify PRs we think we can merge
or close. (gundalow, 09:03:37)
* We will be ignoring `label:new_plugin` instead focusing on improving
what's already there (gundalow, 09:04:04)
* https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/407 contains more
information. (gundalow, 09:04:24)
* During this if anyone identifies any "If we did X could help", just
add that here. Or if there are specific things you can do `#action
Document X on page Y` (gundalow, 09:05:10)
* filter is `is:pr is:open -label:backport -label:needs_triage
-label:new_module label:small_patch` (gundalow, 09:05:26)
* LINK:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aop...
(gundalow, 09:05:32)
* documenting RETURNS is something that is often overlooked, important
to check that (gundalow, 09:32:05)
* ACTION: gundalow merge 48933 in a day unless negative reviews come
through (gundalow, 09:48:18)
* AGREED: Rather than merging during this session we will do `#action
merge pr:1234`, this avoids merging a PR that someone else maybe busy
studying (gundalow, 09:55:15)
* ACTION: merge 48798 (gundalow, 09:57:16)
* ACTION: gundalow 48798 - should gtema be a maintainer for
`cloud/openstack/`? (gundalow, 09:58:07)
* ACTION: merge 48792 (gundalow, 10:01:16)
* ACTION: AWS to review and merge 49061 (gundalow, 10:01:35)
* ACTION: Network to review 41107 (gundalow, 10:01:54)
* ACTION: jborean93 48761 (gundalow, 10:04:14)
* ACTION: jborean93 to add words & close 48666 (gundalow, 10:10:05)
* For future Bug Reviews should we focus on bug fixes? (gundalow,
10:12:17)
* LINK: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/46675 (rajeevarakkal,
10:13:35)
* ACTION: 46675 merge (gundalow, 10:20:07)
* ACTION: 48599 merge (gundalow, 10:35:27)
* ACTION: Core to review & merge 48598 (gundalow, 10:38:28)
* ACTION: merge, + backport PRs for 47788 (gundalow, 11:18:57)
* When people put `alternative fix #1234` should we get better at
closing the other PR, or making it clearer that possibly the PR author
should do that - example 47733 (gundalow, 11:23:02)
* unless we enforce changelogs via CI we aren't going to get them
(gundalow, 11:28:21)
* ACTION: merge (changelog) and backport 47193 (gundalow, 11:32:09)
* ACTION: merge (needs changelog) 47134 (gundalow, 11:33:26)
* ACTION: review 47020 (robertdebock, 11:37:16)
* ACTION: robertdebock review 47020 (gundalow, 11:37:28)
* ACTION: Azure to review& merge 46608 (gundalow, 12:14:39)
* ACTION: merge & backport 46604 (gundalow, 12:17:03)
* ACTION: AWS to review and merge 46124 (gundalow, 12:21:21)
* I may look at doing Working Group specific triage days if we can find
a time that we can get a good set of people together (gundalow,
12:26:46)
* ACTION: merge 33239 (gundalow, 12:32:42)
* ACTION: close 45706 (gundalow, 12:32:52)
* http://sage.thesharps.us/2014/09/01/the-gentle-art-of-patch-review/ is
an interesting read on how to give review feedback (gundalow,
13:01:43)
* ACTION: gundalow to speak to Monty and see what help I can give to get
`label:openstack` moving (gundalow, 13:09:50)
* ACTION: merge 45198 (gundalow, 13:15:25)
* negative testing can be done in integration tests, include
`ignore_errors: yes` with `register: response` and check
`response.failed` and `responsed.message` contains something
(gundalow, 13:22:39)
* Example of testing negative case
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/test/integration/targets/vy...
[ADD TO DOCS] (gundalow, 13:26:12)
* LINK:
https://help.github.com/articles/searching-issues-and-pull-requests/#sear...
not tested it (gundalow, 13:35:33)
* https://help.github.com/articles/searching-issues-and-pull-requests/
has *loads* of different ways to search/filter issues & PRs
(gundalow, 13:35:56)
* ACTION: merged 45117 (gundalow, 13:40:07)
* ACTION: merge 44005 (gundalow, 13:53:46)
* ACTION: merge 43722 (gundalow, 13:54:58)
* ACTION: backport 43722 (gundalow, 13:55:20)
* ACTION: Ricky to review & merge 43151 (gundalow, 14:00:48)
* ACTION: 42239 merge (gregdek, 14:14:22)
* HELP: (gundalow, 14:36:11)
* HELP: (gundalow, 14:36:15)
* HELP: (gundalow, 14:37:12)
* Review! (gundalow, 14:37:27)
* ACTION: gundalow consider raising adding to Bot plan: command to
raise backport after merge (if it contains changelog)
`rebase_merge_create_backport`) (gundalow, 14:42:39)
* ACTION: jborean93 to look at 41105 - (gundalow, 14:56:45)
* ACTION: backport https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/40680
(gundalow, 14:58:27)
* Big PR closing session (gundalow, 15:10:05)
* LINK:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=+is%3Aopen+-lab...
(gundalow, 15:13:11)
* LINK: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/16182 <= this we can
just close (bcoca, 15:17:05)
* ACTION: gundalow to 1) Manually review all open inventory PRs
(byfile) and work out what can be closed/directed to inventory
plugins 2) Add to bot logic (gundalow, 15:24:01)
* No more `label/needs_shippable` (gundalow, 15:29:00)
* ACTION: gundalow to look at Bot code and see if we can remove
`needs_shippable` label (gundalow, 15:30:28)
* LINK:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+labe...
(gundalow, 15:32:06)
* LINK:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/44268#issuecomment-415853558
confuses
mehttps://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/commits/lib/ansible/modules/clo...
never existed (gundalow, 15:40:35)
* 5 deprecated PRs closed (gundalow, 15:42:51)
* ACTION: botbug deprecated for issues looks wrong. May need to
recalculate (gundalow, 15:43:16)
* LINK:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=+is%3Aopen+-lab...
(gundalow, 15:46:56)
* ACTION: close 12489 (gregdek, 15:49:38)
* ACTION: close 13907 (gregdek, 15:50:27)
* ACTION: gundalow to ensure that between Core Triage and Community
Triage everything gets looked at - account for if an issue (or more
likely a PR) hits core, network, community it's clear who's
responsible for (gundalow, 16:11:53)
* LINK:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=+is%3Aopen+-lab...
(gundalow, 16:14:21)
* ACTION: gundalow turn
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/24032#issuecomment-442906978
into a GitHub fragment (gundalow, 16:48:53)
* ACTION: work out guide to reopen a closed PR, perhaps by pushing to
the branch again (gundalow, 16:58:09)
* new_contirbutor (gundalow, 17:07:30)
* LINK:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aop...
(gundalow, 17:08:02)
* LINK:
http://sage.thesharps.us/2014/09/01/the-gentle-art-of-patch-review/
(gundalow, 17:12:00)
* I'm really impressed with what was achived. Thanks everyone
(gundalow, 17:14:21)
* Having clear GitHub searches defined in advance is a must
(gundalow, 17:14:40)
* We need to agree the criteria for closing old feature PRs, and not
be afraid of doing so (gundalow, 17:15:06)
* I wonder if ignoring any PR where there is a working group would
also be useful (gundalow, 17:15:39)
* I want to do some dedicated working group triage days. I think this
shows it does work, may just need more notice and doodle poll to
find a day that works best (gundalow, 17:16:25)
* ACTION: gundalow get core to review
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/labels/candidate_to_close
(gundalow, 17:19:45)
* I'm doing an internal review of `label/support:network` over the
next week or two, followed by `label/networking` (the stuff not
maintianed by networking team) (gundalow, 17:23:27)
* Any ideas/feedback in here or feel free to ping me directly
(gundalow, 17:25:31)
Meeting ended at 17:25:33 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* gundalow merge 48933 in a day unless negative reviews come through
* merge 48798
* gundalow 48798 - should gtema be a maintainer for `cloud/openstack/`?
* merge 48792
* AWS to review and merge 49061
* Network to review 41107
* jborean93 48761
* jborean93 to add words & close 48666
* 46675 merge
* 48599 merge
* Core to review & merge 48598
* merge, + backport PRs for 47788
* merge (changelog) and backport 47193
* merge (needs changelog) 47134
* review 47020
* robertdebock review 47020
* Azure to review& merge 46608
* merge & backport 46604
* AWS to review and merge 46124
* merge 33239
* close 45706
* gundalow to speak to Monty and see what help I can give to get
`label:openstack` moving
* merge 45198
* merged 45117
* merge 44005
* merge 43722
* backport 43722
* Ricky to review & merge 43151
* 42239 merge
* gundalow consider raising adding to Bot plan: command to raise
backport after merge (if it contains changelog)
`rebase_merge_create_backport`)
* jborean93 to look at 41105 -
* backport https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/40680
* gundalow to 1) Manually review all open inventory PRs (byfile) and
work out what can be closed/directed to inventory plugins 2) Add to
bot logic
* gundalow to look at Bot code and see if we can remove
`needs_shippable` label
* botbug deprecated for issues looks wrong. May need to recalculate
* close 12489
* close 13907
* gundalow to ensure that between Core Triage and Community Triage
everything gets looked at - account for if an issue (or more likely a
PR) hits core, network, community it's clear who's responsible for
* gundalow turn
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/24032#issuecomment-442906978
into a GitHub fragment
* work out guide to reopen a closed PR, perhaps by pushing to the branch
again
* gundalow get core to review
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/labels/candidate_to_close
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* gundalow
* gundalow merge 48933 in a day unless negative reviews come through
* gundalow 48798 - should gtema be a maintainer for
`cloud/openstack/`?
* gundalow to speak to Monty and see what help I can give to get
`label:openstack` moving
* gundalow consider raising adding to Bot plan: command to raise
backport after merge (if it contains changelog)
`rebase_merge_create_backport`)
* gundalow to 1) Manually review all open inventory PRs (byfile) and
work out what can be closed/directed to inventory plugins 2) Add to
bot logic
* gundalow to look at Bot code and see if we can remove
`needs_shippable` label
* gundalow to ensure that between Core Triage and Community Triage
everything gets looked at - account for if an issue (or more likely
a PR) hits core, network, community it's clear who's responsible for
* gundalow turn
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/24032#issuecomment-442906978
into a GitHub fragment
* gundalow get core to review
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/labels/candidate_to_close
* jborean93
* jborean93 48761
* jborean93 to add words & close 48666
* jborean93 to look at 41105 -
* robertdebock
* robertdebock review 47020
* **UNASSIGNED**
* merge 48798
* merge 48792
* AWS to review and merge 49061
* Network to review 41107
* 46675 merge
* 48599 merge
* Core to review & merge 48598
* merge, + backport PRs for 47788
* merge (changelog) and backport 47193
* merge (needs changelog) 47134
* review 47020
* Azure to review& merge 46608
* merge & backport 46604
* AWS to review and merge 46124
* merge 33239
* close 45706
* merge 45198
* merged 45117
* merge 44005
* merge 43722
* backport 43722
* Ricky to review & merge 43151
* 42239 merge
* backport https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/40680
* botbug deprecated for issues looks wrong. May need to recalculate
* close 12489
* close 13907
* work out guide to reopen a closed PR, perhaps by pushing to the
branch again
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* gundalow (548)
* gregdek (91)
* robertdebock (70)
* bcoca (65)
* shaps (31)
* zodbot (31)
* webknjaz (24)
* Xaroth (13)
* jborean93 (12)
* evrardjp (12)
* mrproper (12)
* winem_ (11)
* acozine (11)
* akasurde (10)
* rajeevarakkal (9)
* Pilou (7)
* jtanner (7)
* mnaser (6)
* felixfontein (6)
* sivel (4)
* samccann (4)
* resmo (4)
* chopraaa (4)
* AndyG (4)
* misc (2)
* felix__ (2)
* gwmngilfen (2)
* karstensrage (2)
* alexsaezm (2)
* ganeshrn (2)
* dericcrago (2)
* davegarath (1)
* abadger1999 (1)
* bizonk (1)
* rbarlik (1)
* apple4ever (1)
* cybette (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-community/2018-11-29/ansible_co...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...
5 years, 4 months
shepdelacreme's meeting titled "lockdown" ended in #ansible-lockdown
by notifications＠fedoraproject.org
Notification time stamped 2018-11-29 17:19:51 UTC
===========================
#ansible-lockdown: lockdown
===========================
Meeting started by shepdelacreme at 16:06:11 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-lockdown/2018-11-29/lockdown.20...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* open topics (shepdelacreme, 16:11:03)
* IDEA: add detailed examples to the top level ansible-lockdown repo
(shepdelacreme, 16:19:49)
* IDEA: namespace handlers so they don't conflict between roles
(shepdelacreme, 16:21:30)
* IDEA: recommend best practice to have 1 role to 1 play
(shepdelacreme, 16:22:03)
* IDEA: have a separate role with all the handlers and then include
that role (shepdelacreme, 16:23:01)
* AGREED: document using separate plays to avoid handler collisions
and investigate namespacing handlers down the line (shepdelacreme,
16:31:30)
* HELP: I can't speak to any specifics right now (and this might not
be the appropriate time to mention this...) but I've been having a
heck of a time trying to get remediation to work properly. I'm
willing to test things on test server if anyone needs a tester. I
can provide more details if this is the appropriate time) Thanks
btw for all you guys are doing! (Sicnus, 16:37:40)
* ACTION: cyberpear to address RHEL6 V1R20 updates and tests as
filters (shepdelacreme, 16:37:45)
* IDEA: have ansible-lockdown office hours to help folks use our role
and find pain points (cyberpear, 16:50:53)
Meeting ended at 17:19:51 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* cyberpear to address RHEL6 V1R20 updates and tests as filters
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* cyberpear
* cyberpear to address RHEL6 V1R20 updates and tests as filters
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* shepdelacreme (63)
* defionscode (46)
* cyberpear (28)
* Sicnus (25)
* cyberpear_ (17)
* zodbot (5)
* treyp (2)
* bcoca (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-lockdown/2018-11-29/lockdown.20...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...
5 years, 4 months
smooge's meeting titled "Infrastructure (2018-11-29)" ended in
#fedora-meeting-1
by notifications＠fedoraproject.org
Notification time stamped 2018-11-29 15:52:00 UTC
==============================================
#fedora-meeting-1: Infrastructure (2018-11-29)
==============================================
Meeting started by smooge at 15:00:48 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-11-29/infrastruct...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* aloha (smooge, 15:00:48)
* New folks introductions (smooge, 15:03:38)
* This is a place where people who are interested in Fedora
Infrastructure can introduce themselves (smooge, 15:03:38)
* Getting Started Guide:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/GettingStarted
(smooge, 15:03:38)
* announcements and information (smooge, 15:06:01)
* tflink is on extended PTO (smooge, 15:06:02)
* bodhi updated (smooge, 15:06:02)
* fpdc with release info available in staging
(https://fpdc.stg.fedoraproject.org/api/v1/release) - cverna
(smooge, 15:06:02)
* fedmsg-migration-tools deployed to production (smooge, 15:06:02)
* lots of fedmsg moved to python3 (smooge, 15:06:04)
* new fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure released (pingou, 15:07:23)
* Oncall (smooge, 15:10:30)
* nirik is on call from 2018-11-22->2018-11-29 (smooge, 15:10:31)
* smooge is on call from 2018-11-29->2018-12-06 (smooge, 15:10:31)
* ??? is on call from 2018-12-06->2018-12-13 (smooge, 15:10:31)
* Summary of last week: (from nirik ) (smooge, 15:10:31)
* Tickets discussion (smooge, 15:18:35)
* https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/report/Meetings%20ticket
(smooge, 15:18:36)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7389 is about
running a telegram <--> irc bridge (nirik, 15:19:58)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7399 (nirik,
15:20:34)
* Apprentice Open office minutes (smooge, 15:39:29)
* A time where apprentices may ask for help or look at problems.
(smooge, 15:39:29)
* Open Floor (smooge, 15:44:09)
* Red Hat has a vacation time from 2018-12-22 -> 2019-01-02. Most Red
Hat employees will be completely unavailable and skeleton crew will
try to keep things going (smooge, 15:46:34)
Meeting ended at 15:52:00 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* smooge (56)
* bowlofeggs (49)
* nirik (30)
* puiterwijk (14)
* zodbot (9)
* mkonecny (5)
* pingou (3)
* relrod_cld (2)
* mizdebsk (2)
* creaked (1)
* threebean (0)
* cverna (0)
* tflink (0)
* relrod (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-11-29/infrastruct...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...
5 years, 4 months