Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317
--- Comment #23 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-07-05 16:56:41 EDT ---
Just double the percent sign. It should be fixed in the native package as well.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl
--- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-07-05 08:29:32 EDT ---
This package fails while executing the ./configure command on both my F11
x86_64 notebook and on Koji:
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu':
machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized
configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed
and: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1454965&name=build.log
I think it's caused by an ancient version of the autotools which was used to
generate the ./configure script
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl
--- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-07-05 08:20:05 EDT ---
This package doesn't compile on my Fedora 11 environment using rpmbuild:
libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -o .libs/RGBtoYUV411.exe
RGBtoYUV411.o common/libconv_common.a
../../libdirac_common/.libs/libdirac_common.a
libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -o .libs/RGBtoYUV420.exe
RGBtoYUV420.o common/libconv_common.a
../../libdirac_common/.libs/libdirac_common.a
common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:62:
undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE'
common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:54:
undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [RGBtoYUV420.exe] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:62:
undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE'
common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:54:
undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [RGBtoYUV411.exe] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion'
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr
| |oject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317
--- Comment #21 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-07-05 08:05:03 EDT ---
After discussion on the Fedora-MinGW mailing list (
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-June/001739.html )
we decided that it's okay to keep the commented out blocks and -tools
subpackage if that's what the packager desires. Now that's cleared up we can
continue with the review.
$ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer.spec
mingw32-gstreamer.spec:196: E: files-attr-not-set
mingw32-gstreamer.spec:553: W: macro-in-%changelog doc
mingw32-gstreamer.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab:
line 7)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer-*
mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: description-line-too-long The
mingw32-gstreamer-static package contains static library for mingw32-gstreamer
development.
mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.a
mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstcontroller-0.10.a
mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstbase-0.10.a
mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstdataprotocol-0.10.a
mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstnet-0.10.a
mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-gstreamer-tools.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized common tools and
files for GStreamer streaming media framework
mingw32-gstreamer-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings.
All these rpmlint messages need to be fixed with the exception of the
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object and no-documentation ones
(as they're false positives for the mingw32 toolchain).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Hi,
I am looking at the comtents of
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/ with i686-pc-mingw32-nm. There
are a lot of symbols there!
Shouldn't these all be stripped? Is there a bug in the search script?
Thanks,
Adam
Hello !
I'm interested in mingw SIG, mainly around multimedia area.
I hope to help providing some rpm dependencies for building the vlc
multimedia player at videolan.org.
The release system there already provides mingw32 patches that will make easier.
I plan to submit some dependencies for the fedora native package I
already maintain.
I can also provides my help reviewing others mingw32 packages.
(testing from a x86_64 workstation).
I'm also interested in 3D rendering software that I'm already
packaging in Fedora (aqsis, Pixie, blender, etc)
mingw32-dirac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690
mingw32-gdbm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691
mingw32-cppunit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689
About mingw32-libatomic_ops
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692
It only provides a static library as the native fedora package does.
mingw32 guideline request to have shared libraries but there is one
exception, does this package fall under the same kind of exception ?
I'm using smock.pl for building packages. Here is a patch that will
add a --suffix option in order to use any custom mock configuration
files. For an example:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/11/i386/mock-kwizart-11.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Thx
Nicolas (kwizart)
Pratyus Priyadarsi belongs to Skoost and sent you a little gift.
Click below to collect your gift:
http://www.skoost.com/fun?fedora%2Dmingw%40lists%2Efedoraproject%2Eorg/2108…
P.S. This is a safe and innocent gift that Pratyus Priyadarsi
sent from Skoost, the free goodies website.
This e-mail was sent to fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org on 7/3/2009 11:18:51 AM
on behalf of Pratyus Priyadarsi (pratyus120(a)gmail.com)
Pratyus Priyadarsi belongs to Skoost and sent you a little gift.
Click below to collect your gift:
http://www.skoost.com/fun?fedora%2Dmingw%40lists%2Efedoraproject%2Eorg/2108…
P.S. This is a safe and innocent gift that Pratyus Priyadarsi
sent from Skoost, the free goodies website.
This e-mail was sent to fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org on 7/3/2009 11:18:51 AM
on behalf of Pratyus Priyadarsi (pratyus120(a)gmail.com)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |dirac
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |gdbm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |cppunit
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |libatomic_ops
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|mingw32-libatomic_ops - |mingw32-libatomic_ops -
|MinGW Windows libatomic_ops |MinGW Windows port of the
|compression library |libatomic_ops library
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-01 06:12:06 EDT ---
Thx for the review:
Spec URL:
http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libatomic_ops.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libatomic_ops-1.2-2.fc11.src…
Description: MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library
Changelog:
---------
- Drop the powerpc patch
- Move to %%global from %%define
- Provides -static as there is only one static library
- Rsync with native package (Fix the License tag)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-07-01 04:28:21 EDT ---
- Please change the %define tags at the top of the spec file with %global
(because of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over…
)
- What does the patch libatomic_ops-1.2-ppclwzfix.patch do? According to the
filename I think it's some ppc-specific fix which doesn't have any effect on
Win32
- Is it true that this package only provides a static library and no shared
library (.dll) ? If that's the case, some special exceptions apply:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Librari…
(however, we may need to interpret these slightly different as we don't use
-devel subpackages)
- The version number in the ChangeLog doesn't match the version specified in
the Version and Release tags
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr
| |oject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr
| |oject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr
| |oject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr
| |oject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr
| |oject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.