mingw July 2009

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

15 participants
97 discussions

[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #15 from Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 2009-07-17 20:21:49 EDT --- new version 8.4.0 http://ispbrasil.com.br/pgsql/mingw32-postgresql.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/pgsql/mingw32-postgresql-8.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1483343 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. | |com.br) --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2009-07-17 18:56:37 EDT --- It's been six weeks since that ping. I guess this should be closed soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 509940] Cmake can't build sdl program with mingw32
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940 --- Comment #2 from dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com 2009-07-17 09:30:49 EDT --- mingw32-sdl is installed. Here is part of rpm -qi mingw32-SDL. Name : mingw32-SDL Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.2.13 Vendor: Fedora Project If you look at FindSDL.cmake, you will see the FIND_PATH for SDL.h. It is search a bunch of paths but nothing that can be found from the root path /usr/i686-pc-mingw32. The cmake mailing list suggested adding /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw to the root path but the FIND_PATH in FindSDL.cmake isn't looking in /include/SDL so it still doesn't find it. It was mentioned that the FindSDL.cmake is using an old way to look for the appropriate include files. Not sure what the current suggested practice is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-17 06:32:39 EDT --- For the record, mingw32-gcc has been submitted as #512323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-17 06:21:10 EDT --- I've made a working (building, no runtime test yet). mingw32-gc package. The problem is that's the 9.2 alpha release. I don't remember which mingw32 package I haven't yet submitted will requires mingw32-libatomic_ops, so that can wait a little for gc 9.2 to move to stable from upstream. So yes, the plan is to have it merged with gc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 509940] Cmake can't build sdl program with mingw32
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org | CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2009-07-17 06:11:21 EDT --- Do you still want me to review this package (as the native one has been orphaned) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fwd: Re: %{_global_cflags}]
by Farkas Levente 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

would be nice to rewrite %_mingw32_cflags to %__global_cflags -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: %{_global_cflags} Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:17:00 +0200 From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com> To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com> References: <fac47fca0907130731p7a930455t99d71a4bd2c080a0(a)mail.gmail.com> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:31:34 +0200, Marcus wrote: > Hi all. > > In http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros > %{_global_cflags} is set and %{_optflags} references > %{__global_cflags} (double underscores). Is this correct or should it > say %{_global_cflags}? %{optflags} and %{__global_cflags} $ rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables $ rpm --eval %__global_cflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

1 0

[Bug 502691] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-09 07:17:19 EDT --- Sorry, this package was added with #467391 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 502690] Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-09 07:05:39 EDT --- It worked with F-10 mingw32 but not anymore with F-11 and later: This problem is about binary mode with win32 executable, but I'm only interested in the libraries which built cannot be splitted easily from the executable. Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mingw32-dirac.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mingw32-dirac-1.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows dirac compression library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw July 2009