[Bug 509940] Cmake can't build sdl program with mingw32
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940
--- Comment #2 from dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com 2009-07-17 09:30:49 EDT ---
mingw32-sdl is installed. Here is part of rpm -qi mingw32-SDL.
Name : mingw32-SDL Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.2.13 Vendor: Fedora Project
If you look at FindSDL.cmake, you will see the FIND_PATH for SDL.h. It is
search a bunch of paths but nothing that can be found from the root path
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32. The cmake mailing list suggested adding
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw to the root path but the FIND_PATH in
FindSDL.cmake isn't looking in /include/SDL so it still doesn't find it. It
was mentioned that the FindSDL.cmake is using an old way to look for the
appropriate include files. Not sure what the current suggested practice is.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months
[Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-17 06:21:10 EDT ---
I've made a working (building, no runtime test yet). mingw32-gc package.
The problem is that's the 9.2 alpha release.
I don't remember which mingw32 package I haven't yet submitted will requires
mingw32-libatomic_ops, so that can wait a little for gc 9.2 to move to stable
from upstream.
So yes, the plan is to have it merged with gc.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 9 months
[Fwd: Re: %{_global_cflags}]
by Farkas Levente
would be nice to rewrite %_mingw32_cflags to %__global_cflags
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: %{_global_cflags}
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:17:00 +0200
From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
References: <fac47fca0907130731p7a930455t99d71a4bd2c080a0(a)mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:31:34 +0200, Marcus wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> In http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros
> %{_global_cflags} is set and %{_optflags} references
> %{__global_cflags} (double underscores). Is this correct or should it
> say %{_global_cflags}?
%{optflags} and %{__global_cflags}
$ rpm --eval %optflags
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586
-mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
$ rpm --eval %__global_cflags
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
14 years, 9 months