[Bug 599227] New: mingw <pthread.h> is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw <pthread.h> is broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599227
Summary: mingw <pthread.h> is broken
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: mingw32-pthreads
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: eblake(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com,
rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
The cross-compilation header
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pthread.h, installed as part of the
mingw32-pthreads package, has several coding bugs.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-10.fc13.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try cross-compiling any code that uses localtime_r with a second argument
with side effects, or try calling (localtime_r)(arg1,arg2).
2. Try cross-compiling any project that uses gnulib's <time.h> replacement
header (libvirt is an example project; it includes a ./autobuild.sh script that
will automatically try a mingw cross-compilation, if you have installed a mingw
portablexdr library, although that library is not yet part of fedora).
Actual results:
The definition of localtime_r is broken, because it evaluates the second
argument twice. And, since POSIX allows one to #undef localtime_r, but there
is no localtime_r function in the library, you get a link failure if you bypass
the function-like macro. Finally, the pthreads-win32 library made the mistake
of installing <config.h>, which is asking for namespace collision with most
other autotooled packages.
Expected results:
<pthread.h> should not define any *_r functions, nor should it interfere with a
proper <time.h>. Also, the library should not install <config.h>, but should
instead modify its installed headers to be self-contained.
Additional info:
See this thread on bug-gnulib for more details:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-06/msg00007.html
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 11 months
[Bug 629209] New: Update mingw32-runtime to 3.18
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Update mingw32-runtime to 3.18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629209
Summary: Update mingw32-runtime to 3.18
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: mingw32-runtime
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: atkac(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
When I compile TigerVNC vncviewer for Windows on Fedora 14/rawhide, output
vncviewer.exe binary is broken:
...
Backtrace:
=>0 0x00485e4f in vncviewer (+0x85e4f) (0x00a0fe30)
1 0x0040108d __mingw_CRTStartup+0x6c()
[/builddir/build/BUILD/mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32/crt1.c:217] in vncviewer
(0x00a0fe70)
2 0x0040108d __mingw_CRTStartup+0x6c()
[/builddir/build/BUILD/mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32/crt1.c:217] in vncviewer
(0x00a0fe90)
3 0x00401128 WinMainCRTStartup+0x17()
[/builddir/build/BUILD/mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32/crt1.c:271] in vncviewer
(0x00a0fea8)
4 0x7ede70bc call_process_entry+0xb() in kernel32 (0x00a0fee8)
5 0x7efab570 call_thread_func+0xb() in ntdll (0x00a0fef8)
6 0x7efae1f1 call_thread_entry_point+0x70() in ntdll (0x00a0ffc8)
7 0x7ef83feb call_dll_entry_point+0x65a() in ntdll (0x00a0ffe8)
...
When I updated to the latest mingw runtime from upstream
(mingwrt-3.18-mingw32-src) everything works fine.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mingw32-runtime-3.15.2-5.fc13
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. compile program for Windows via MinGW build chain
2. run it
Actual results:
crash
Expected results:
working binary
Additional info:
It seems current mingw runtime is not compatible with gcc 4.5. As I wrote above
when I update to 3.18 version, problem disappears.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 11 months
Proposal: drop the hard dependency on mingw32-gettext from mingw32-glib2
by Erik van Pienbroek
Hi,
Recently I was browsing the upstream GTK website and I noticed that
upstream has used a special trick to build the Win32 binaries for GLib.
In order to make the dependency on gettext a soft one they used a small
static wrapper library called libproxy-intl [1]. With this wrapper
library the GLib DLL doesn't depend directly anymore on libintl-8.dll
(from mingw32-gettext). The wrapper library makes the hard dependency a
runtime one. This means that if libintl-8.dll is bundled with the
application then gettext translations will be used, otherwise nothing
gets translated.
I'd like to propose that we apply this change as well in our Fedora
MinGW toolchain.
Such a change consists of the following smaller changes:
- Bundle the libproxy-intl code (1 .c file and 1 .h file) in
the mingw32-gettext srpm as additional source files
- Compile the libproxy-intl code with these 2 instructions:
%{_mingw32_cc} -c libintl.c -o libintl.o -I.
%{_mingw32_ar} rc libintl.a libintl.o
- Replace the files libintl.{a,.dll.a,.la} generated by the
gettext compilation with the libintl.a file from libproxy-intl.
This makes any binary which tries to link against mingw32-gettext
using '-lintl' have a soft-dependency on libintl.
After this a simple rebuild of mingw32-glib2 should be sufficient enough
to make mingw32-gettext a soft dependency.
Next to glib2 there are also some other packages which have a hard
dependency on libintl-8.dll:
$ repoquery --whatrequires 'mingw32(libintl-8.dll)'
mingw32-atk-0:1.32.0-1.fc14.noarch
mingw32-gdk-pixbuf-0:2.22.0-1.fc14.noarch
mingw32-glib2-0:2.26.0-1.fc14.noarch
mingw32-gnutls-0:2.6.4-3.fc13.noarch
mingw32-gtk-vnc-0:0.4.1-1.fc14.noarch
mingw32-gtk2-0:2.22.0-1.fc14.noarch
mingw32-gtkhtml3-0:3.32.0-1.fc14.noarch
mingw32-gvnc-0:0.4.1-1.fc14.noarch
mingw32-hunspell-0:1.2.8-11.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libglade2-0:2.6.4-4.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libidn-0:1.14-5.fc12.noarch
Most of these packages (if not all) don't use gettext directly, but get
linked against gettext because of it being mentioned in glib2's
pkgconfig and .la files. A rebuild should be sufficient to replace the
hard dependencies on those packages by soft ones. However, in order to
prevent the libproxy-intl functions from being exported in other DLL's
(as mentioned on [1]) I think it's better drop the reference to libintl
from glib2's pkgconfig and .la files. As most of the packages mentioned
above don't use gettext directly, but the GLib gettext functions to
handle translations this shouldn't cause any major problems.
As the glib2 headers depend on the libintl.h header a 'Requires:
mingw32-gettext' also needs to be added to the mingw32-glib2 package.
I already applied these changes in a testing repository for a generic
cross compiler framework (coming soon!) [2][3] and it works fine there.
Another thing GTK upstream has done in their Win32 binaries is using
win-iconv instead of GNU iconv. I just put up a review request for
mingw32-win-iconv at [4]. Could somebody please review that package?
Does everybody agree to these changes?
Kind regards,
Erik van Pienbroek
[1]: http://www.gtk.org/download-windows.html
[2]: http://svn.openftd.org/svn/fedora_cross
[3]: http://svn.openftd.org/viewvc/Fedora%20Cross%20Compiler%
20Framework/
[4]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208
12 years, 11 months
[Bug 539698] New: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539698
Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and
mingw32-binutils
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: mingw32-binutils
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jarin.franek(a)post.cz
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Trying to install both binutils debuginfo and mingw32-binutils debuginfo
packages (In fact, I did install debuginfo for the whole distribution). The
transaction check fails with a conflict.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mingw32-binutils-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64
binutils-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64
How reproducible:
see the steps:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. debuginfo-install binutils
2. debuginfo-install mingw32-binutils
Actual results:
----------------------------------------snippet
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elf.c from install of
mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64
file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elfcode.h from install of
mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64
file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/section.c from install of
mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64
file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/gas/dw2gencfi.c from install of
mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64
file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/ld/ldmain.c from install of
mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64
Error Summary
-------------
----------------------------------------snippet
Expected results:
No conflict.
Since both binutils and mingw32-binutils install in-parallel without problems,
I would expect their debuginfo packages to install in-parallel as well.
Additional info:
May concern other mingw32-* packages as well.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 4 months
[Bug 595006] New: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595006
Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: mingw32-dlfcn
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: stebbins(a)jetheaddev.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com,
rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When attempting to link with libdl.a this error occurs:
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.a: could not read symbols:
Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Release : 0.7.r11.fc12
Steps to Reproduce:
1. gcc -static somefile.c -o some.exe -ldl
Additional info:
running ranlib fixes the problem:
# i686-pc-mingw32-ranlib libdl.a
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 4 months
[Bug 643458] New: Mingw doesn't have mingw32-qmake-qt
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Mingw doesn't have mingw32-qmake-qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643458
Summary: Mingw doesn't have mingw32-qmake-qt
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: mingw32-filesystem
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: drizt(a)land.ru
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee,
erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Mingw environment includes mingw32-configure, mingw32-make, mingw32-cmake,
mingw32-pkg-config scripts which i can use for compiling application for
Windows. But it doesn't have mingw32-qmake-qt. I'd like to have this script
which might setup mingw32 environment and start qmake-qt4 -win32 -spec
fedora-win32-cross
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 628199] New: mingw32: libintl-8.dll instead of libintl.dll
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32: libintl-8.dll instead of libintl.dll
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628199
Summary: mingw32: libintl-8.dll instead of libintl.dll
Product: Fedora
Version: 13
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: mingw32-gettext
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: felipe.contreras(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com,
erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Most GTK+ distributions in win32 use libintl.dll, so libraries compiled in
Fedora don't work there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
