[Bug 653674] Fails to create debug build of Qt projects on mingw
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl
Flag|needinfo?(fedora-mingw@list |
|s.fedoraproject.org) |
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2010-11-23 15:01:38 EST ---
> So, my understanding is that the Fedora MinGW maintainers would like us to
> apply this patch to our qt package, is that correct?
That's correct
> If it is so, since it shouldn't affect anybody else, I'm OK with applying that
> patch to our Qt packaging. I'd prefer this to get sorted out upstream, but I'm
> OK with the patch if the MinGW folks are convinced it's right.
>
> (I personally have some reservations about a variable named $${QT_LIBINFIX}
> being made a postfix though. MinGW folks: are you sure this makes sense?)
We've asked upstream in the mentioned bugreport what the correct behaviour
should be (should the suffix be 'd4' of '4d'? where does the '4' come from?).
Unfortunately we haven't seen any response to that question so our best guess
is to work around it in the qmake mkspecs files for now until upstream provides
more information.
The win32 binaries provided by upstream all use the suffix 'd4' as well so our
packaging looks okay from that point of view
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 4 months
[Bug 653674] Fails to create debug build of Qt projects on mingw
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(fedora-mingw@list
| |s.fedoraproject.org)
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2010-11-23 14:43:03 EST ---
So, my understanding is that the Fedora MinGW maintainers would like us to
apply this patch to our qt package, is that correct?
If it is so, since it shouldn't affect anybody else, I'm OK with applying that
patch to our Qt packaging. I'd prefer this to get sorted out upstream, but I'm
OK with the patch if the MinGW folks are convinced it's right.
(I personally have some reservations about a variable named $${QT_LIBINFIX}
being made a postfix though. MinGW folks: are you sure this makes sense?)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 4 months
needinfo requested: [Bug 653674] Fails to create debug build of Qt projects on mingw
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Component: qt
Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> has asked MinGW Maintenance Account
<fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> for needinfo:
Bug 653674: Fails to create debug build of Qt projects on mingw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653674
------- Additional Comments from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org>
So, my understanding is that the Fedora MinGW maintainers would like us to
apply this patch to our qt package, is that correct?
If it is so, since it shouldn't affect anybody else, I'm OK with applying that
patch to our Qt packaging. I'd prefer this to get sorted out upstream, but I'm
OK with the patch if the MinGW folks are convinced it's right.
(I personally have some reservations about a variable named $${QT_LIBINFIX}
being made a postfix though. MinGW folks: are you sure this makes sense?)
13 years, 4 months
[mingw32-binutils/f14/master] Enable auto_import by default (#629209)
by Kalev Lember
commit 53c562ae1789bf8d612b85f244648f01aabd9a76
Author: Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee>
Date: Mon Nov 22 18:34:24 2010 +0200
Enable auto_import by default (#629209)
binutils-2.20.1-enable-auto-import.patch | 13 +++++++++++++
mingw32-binutils.spec | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/binutils-2.20.1-enable-auto-import.patch b/binutils-2.20.1-enable-auto-import.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..360b358
--- /dev/null
+++ b/binutils-2.20.1-enable-auto-import.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+diff -up binutils-2.20.1/ld/emultempl/pe.em.auto_import binutils-2.20.1/ld/emultempl/pe.em
+--- binutils-2.20.1/ld/emultempl/pe.em.auto_import 2010-11-22 18:20:18.000000000 +0200
++++ binutils-2.20.1/ld/emultempl/pe.em 2010-11-22 18:21:46.000000000 +0200
+@@ -154,6 +154,9 @@ case ${target} in
+ *-*-cygwin*)
+ default_auto_import=1
+ ;;
++ i[3-7]86-*-mingw* | x86_64-*-mingw*)
++ default_auto_import=1
++ ;;
+ *)
+ default_auto_import=-1
+ ;;
diff --git a/mingw32-binutils.spec b/mingw32-binutils.spec
index 318e632..5332f4e 100644
--- a/mingw32-binutils.spec
+++ b/mingw32-binutils.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
Name: mingw32-binutils
Version: 2.20.1
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: MinGW Windows binutils
License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+
Group: Development/Libraries
URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
Source0: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-%{version}.tar.bz2
+# Enable auto_import by default (#629209)
+Patch0: binutils-2.20.1-enable-auto-import.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: flex
@@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ understand Windows executables and DLLs.
%prep
%setup -q -n binutils-%{version}
+%patch0 -p1 -b .auto_import
%build
@@ -70,6 +73,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Mon Nov 22 2010 Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> - 2.20.1-2
+- Enable auto_import by default (#629209)
+
* Thu May 13 2010 Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> - 2.20.1-1
- Update to 2.20.1
13 years, 5 months