August 2010 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 539698] New: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539698 Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: mingw32-binutils AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jarin.franek(a)post.cz QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Trying to install both binutils debuginfo and mingw32-binutils debuginfo packages (In fact, I did install debuginfo for the whole distribution). The transaction check fails with a conflict. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-binutils-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 binutils-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: see the steps: Steps to Reproduce: 1. debuginfo-install binutils 2. debuginfo-install mingw32-binutils Actual results: ----------------------------------------snippet Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elf.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elfcode.h from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/section.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/gas/dw2gencfi.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/ld/ldmain.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 Error Summary ------------- ----------------------------------------snippet Expected results: No conflict. Since both binutils and mingw32-binutils install in-parallel without problems, I would expect their debuginfo packages to install in-parallel as well. Additional info: May concern other mingw32-* packages as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 595006] New: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595006 Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-dlfcn AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stebbins(a)jetheaddev.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When attempting to link with libdl.a this error occurs: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.a: could not read symbols: Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Release : 0.7.r11.fc12 Steps to Reproduce: 1. gcc -static somefile.c -o some.exe -ldl Additional info: running ranlib fixes the problem: # i686-pc-mingw32-ranlib libdl.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 628199] New: mingw32: libintl-8.dll instead of libintl.dll

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32: libintl-8.dll instead of libintl.dll https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628199 Summary: mingw32: libintl-8.dll instead of libintl.dll Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-gettext AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: felipe.contreras(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Most GTK+ distributions in win32 use libintl.dll, so libraries compiled in Fedora don't work there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 508746] New: noarch MinGW debuginfo packages don't get placed in the debuginfo repository

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: noarch MinGW debuginfo packages don't get placed in the debuginfo repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508746 Summary: noarch MinGW debuginfo packages don't get placed in the debuginfo repository Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mash AssignedTo: notting(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, jkeating(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora This bug was originally reported at the rel-eng trac ( https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1949 ), but I was asked to report this here: A few days ago we (the Fedora MinGW SIG) started experimenting with generating -debuginfo subpackages for our libraries. For this we've created some custom scripts to strip out debug information to separate files and added some RPM macro's to create -debuginfo subpackages containing these files. This has been discussed at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-June/001748.html The RPM scripts were added in mingw32-filesystem-52-1.fc12 and some of our regular MinGW packages were rebuild as can be seen at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=111400 After waiting for the next rawhide push we discovered that the mingw32-glib2-debuginfo subpackage wasn't published in the rawhide-debuginfo repository. We think it's caused by the fact that our mingw32 packages are noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 613993] Review Request: mingw32-celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993 --- Comment #5 from Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-27 05:29:33 EDT --- Finally found the time to continue this. Uploaded new rev3 packages: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-celt051/ Build dlls using your patch. Dropped the static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2010-08-20 08:46:12 EDT --- If you really want to, fine, but someone will just close notready bugs eventually anyway. Isn't it far easier to find these submitted but abandoned tickets by following the FE-DEADREVIEW tracker anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-20 08:43:16 EDT --- Does adding NotReady to the Whiteboard help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 --- Comment #18 from Rafael Aquini <aquini(a)linux.com> 2010-08-20 07:54:20 EDT --- Richard, This is a janitorial work on Fedora Package Review queues, -- http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- in order to identify and close stalled reviews. I'm just following this policy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-20 03:42:16 EDT --- Is there a reason to close it? Someone may pick it up again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Rafael Aquini <aquini(a)linux.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aquini(a)linux.com --- Comment #16 from Rafael Aquini <aquini(a)linux.com> 2010-08-19 21:10:31 EDT --- PING Since it's been more than a year with no progress; I guess this bug should be closed soon if there is no response, shouldn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw August 2010