Panu Matilainen schreef op vr 26-11-2010 om 13:20 [+0200]:
> In particular, I'm interested in feedback on the new, pluggable and
> enhanced dependency extration system. Documentation is scarce at the
> moment but some background and examples can be found here:
> http://laiskiainen.org/blog/?p=35
All mingw32 packages in Fedora contain these set of instructions in
the .spec files:
%global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
%global __find_requires %{_mingw32_findrequires}
%global __find_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides}
Does this new dependency extraction system make these kind of
instructions obsolete?
If I understand your blog entry correctly then we (the Fedora MinGW SIG)
are recommended to use something like this:
%__mingw32_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides}
%__mingw32_requires %{_mingw32_findrequires}
Is this correct or do you recommend something different?
The macros %{_mingw32_findrequires} and %{_mingw32_findprovides} are
mentioned in the file /etc/rpm/macros.mingw32 which is part of the
mingw32-filesystem package. Both refer to a small shell script which
uses the i686-pc-mingw32-objdump tool to extract dependency information.
Kind regards,
Erik van Pienbroek
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CVE-2011-2501 libpng: regression of CVE-2004-0421 in 1.2.23+ [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717510
Summary: CVE-2011-2501 libpng: regression of CVE-2004-0421 in
1.2.23+ [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: mingw32-libpng
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: huzaifas(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com,
erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 717084
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora
versions.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the
respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product.
Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available.
Bodhi update submission link:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=717084
Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora.
Only one tracking bug has been filed; please only close it when all
affected versions are fixed.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CVE-2011-2501 libpng: regression of CVE-2004-0421 in 1.2.23+ [epel-5]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717511
Summary: CVE-2011-2501 libpng: regression of CVE-2004-0421 in
1.2.23+ [epel-5]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: mingw32-libpng
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: huzaifas(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 717084
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
epel-5 tracking bug for mingw32-libpng: see blocks bug list for full details of
the security issue(s).
This bug is never intended to be made public, please put any public notes
in the 'blocks' bugs.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
hi,
why there is a mingw-filesystem-scripts package and not move everything
into mingw-filesystem?
i don't see any rational reason for this.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
hi,
after almost finish all gstreamer rebuild:
- gstreamer-plugins-base
add rtsp patch without it rstp not usable on windows. already upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610916
- mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad
add gst-plugins-bad-d3d.patch the new d3dvideosink. already upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651782https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652035
unfortunately it's not compile with mingw-64 trunk, just only 1.0, but
the fix is on the way into mingw64 trunk.
- mingw-gstreamer-ffmpeg
not in the svn repo since not in fedora, but a good conclusion that
before the new marcos this was working (ie with %_mingw32_configure):
---------------------------
%mingw_configure "--enable-shared" "--disable-static"
"--with-ffmpeg-extra-configure='--disable-pthreads --enable-w32threads
--disable-muxer=matroska --disable-demuxer=matroska'"
---------------------------
see the last parameter has "''", but it's no longer works. the only
workaround i found is:
---------------------------
export with_ffmpeg_extra_configure='--disable-pthreads
--enable-w32threads --disable-muxer=matroska --disable-demuxer=matroska'
%mingw_configure "--enable-shared" "--disable-static"
---------------------------
do i add mingw-gstreamer-ffmpeg to the svn?
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> 2011-06-30 13:31:33 EDT ---
Erik, can you explain the legal concerns here?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.