Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710101
Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2011-06-02 15:40:24 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> - Bundle the licence and other %doc's
Not sure if the "other %doc's" add much value to the mingw package. In other
mingw packages we often only package up the license files and leave the rest of
the documentation out, with the rationale that they duplicate what's in the
native package. But I don't care much either way.
Looks good. APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710101
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2011-06-02 15:22:14 EDT ---
Fedora review mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-2.fc15.src.rpm 2011-06-02
+ OK
! needs attention
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint mingw32-libjpeg-turbo \
mingw32-libjpeg-turbo-static \
mingw32-libjpeg-turbo-debuginfo \
mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-2.fc16.src.rpm
mingw32-libjpeg-turbo-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libturbojpeg.a
mingw32-libjpeg-turbo-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libjpeg.a
mingw32-libjpeg-turbo-static.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-libjpeg-turbo-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
mingw-libjpeg-turbo.src:94: W: macro-in-comment %{_mingw32_libdir}
mingw-libjpeg-turbo.src:96: W: macro-in-comment %{_mingw32_libdir}
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings.
! rpmlint doesn't like the commented out lines in %files section; I guess
these can be safely removed to make rpmlint happy. Other errors and
warnings are harmless.
+ The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the package base name
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding
native Fedora package
! The package doesn't contain the license files
(LICENSE.txt and LGPL.txt)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum:
03b9c1406c7bfdc204313c2917ce6962 libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1.tar.gz
03b9c1406c7bfdc204313c2917ce6962 Download/libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1.tar.gz
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
+ Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Directory ownership sane
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8
Issues:
! Would be nice to clean up the rpmlint warnings about macro-in-comment.
! License files (LICENSE.txt and LGPL.txt) are not packaged up; I guess
the README file that's duplicating native docs can be removed.
! Obsoletes and Provides should be defined for the mingw32- binary subpackage,
not for the source package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679060
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-06-02 15:06:35 EDT ---
mingw-antlr-2.7.7-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701112
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed In Version|mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-3.fc |mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-3.fc
|15 |14
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701112
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-06-02 14:59:24 EDT ---
mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710101
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2011-06-02 14:26:44 EDT ---
I think the CMake build system is there mostly for Windows (it can generate
Visual Studio projects) and upstream haven't yet properly tested Windows
support with the autotools based build system.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710101
--- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-06-02 14:18:00 EDT ---
That's really surprising! This would mean that the ABI will be different based
on the build system used. I don't know if that's really how upstream has meant
this to work..
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710101
Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |kalev(a)smartlink.ee
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |kalev(a)smartlink.ee
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2011-06-02 14:12:46 EDT ---
Taking for review.
I'm looking at the installed public headers and jmorecfg.h still has:
typedef int boolean;
This is going to cause trouble because Windows headers (in particular rpcndr.h)
define boolean as 'unsigned char'.
libjpeg-turbo has two different build systems. In addition to the
autotools-based one you've used, there's also a CMake based build system. It
would appear that there's at least one important difference for MinGW builds:
the cmake build system uses win/jconfig.h.in, which in turn defines:
/* Define "boolean" as unsigned char, not int, per Windows custom */
#ifndef __RPCNDR_H__ /* don't conflict if rpcndr.h already read */
typedef unsigned char boolean;
#endif
#define HAVE_BOOLEAN /* prevent jmorecfg.h from redefining it */
So in the light of this, I can suggest two options:
1) Fix up the autotools build system to also typedef boolean as 'unsigned
char'
2) Switch to CMake build system
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.