June 2011 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 701347] Review Request: mingw-gtkmm30 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for the GTK+ library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> 2011-06-03 14:58:51 EDT --- Looks good, thanks! APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 702846] Review Request: mingw32-gdb - MinGW Windows port of the GDB debugger

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702846 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2011-06-03 13:53:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Thomas! (In reply to comment #3) > + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines > ! please modify it to anticipate the "MinGW_future" packaging guidelines > (i.e. rename it to mingw-gdb) Fixed. > ! while the built gdb.exe does work on native Windows, wine gdb.exe just hangs. > I would expect to be able to enter help etc. Since the MinGW project goal is > to minimize windows use, I think gdb.exe working with wine should be a goal > if we are to include the mingw32-gdb package in fedora No idea why it hangs like that and I don't really intend to dig into wine/gdb source to figure it out. In my opinion, gdb is an invaluable debugging tool and as such, it would make sense to keep it in Fedora, even if it doesn't run entirely correctly under Wine (besides, Wine is unavailable on our secondary arches like arm and ppc). If we provide a toolchain to build packages, we should also make sure there's a way to debug them with free tools. There have been numerous people popping in to the #fedora-mingw IRC channel and asking for gdb.exe; each time we've had to send them off to a third party site. Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mingw-gdb.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mingw-gdb-7.2-2.fc15.src.rpm * Fri Jun 03 2011 Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> - 7.2-2 - Renamed the source package to mingw-gdb (#702846) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 701347] Review Request: mingw-gtkmm30 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for the GTK+ library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347 --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2011-06-03 13:20:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > mingw32-gtkmm30.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/share/doc/mingw32-gtkmm30-3.0.1/COPYING > 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. > > ! the fsf address issue should be addressed. Did you or do you know whether the > native package maintainer has contacted upstream? Filed a bug with the upstream bug tracker: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651797 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 642208] Review Request: mingw-win-iconv - iconv implementation using Win32 API

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 --- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-06-03 09:01:16 EDT --- The big difference between GNU libiconv and win-iconv is that GNU libiconv has implemented all the character set conversion in its own code while win-iconv uses the Win32 API to achieve the exact same goal. Win-iconv is meant to be a drop-in replacement for GNU libiconv as it has the same API interface and all it's functions should behave the same as GNU libiconv. Projects like Glib/GTK have also been using win-iconv for some time now in their Win32 releases so this gives me the confidence that it's good to replace GNU libiconv with win-iconv (as it's much smaller than GNU libiconv). I've also been testing win-iconv in the mingw-w64 testing repo (where all packages have been rebuilt) and haven't stumbled across any regressions yet. This proposed change was also announced to the fedora-mingw mailing list recently (see comment 4) and nobody objected to it, so we decided to continue with the review process. It looks like the 0.0.3 version was released less than 48 hours ago. I've updated the package to use this new version: Spec URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw-win-iconv.spec SRPM URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw-win-iconv-0.0.3-1.fc15.src.rpm * Fri Jun 3 2011 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.0.3-1 - Update to 0.0.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 710101] Review Request: mingw-libjpeg-turbo - MinGW Windows Libjpeg-turbo library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710101 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2011-06-02 20:52:51 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 642208] Review Request: mingw-win-iconv - iconv implementation using Win32 API

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 Levente Farkas <lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org --- Comment #12 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org> 2011-06-02 16:45:55 EDT --- there is already a version 0.0.3. anyway do you really thing the a replacement package with version 0.0.3 can replace a package which version is 1.12-14? does anyone has any test or compatibility test etc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 642208] Review Request: mingw-win-iconv - iconv implementation using Win32 API

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 --- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-06-02 16:18:51 EDT --- The SRPM URL should have been http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw-win-iconv-0.0.2-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 642208] Review Request: mingw-win-iconv - iconv implementation using Win32 API

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-06-02 16:17:59 EDT --- Good spotting there! Thanks for taking another look at the package Spec URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw-win-iconv.spec SRPM URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-win-iconv-0.0.2-3.fc15.src.rpm * Thu Jun 2 2011 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.0.2-3 - Moved the obsoletes/provides to the proper location - Bumped the requirement for mingw32-filesystem to >= 68 because of RPM 4.9 support - Dropped the %%defattr tags - Dropped the %%{?dist} tag from the obsoletes/provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 642208] Review Request: mingw-win-iconv - iconv implementation using Win32 API

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 --- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember <kalev(a)smartlink.ee> 2011-06-02 15:53:22 EDT --- One blocker: - Obsoletes and Provides should defined for the binary package, not the srpm Small nitpicking: - The automatic dep extraction that the package relies on is available in mingw32-filesystem >= 68, so it would be best to bump the requirement up from mingw32-filesystem >= 53 that the package currently has. - %defattr(-,root,root,-) is now the default can also be removed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 710101] Review Request: mingw-libjpeg-turbo - MinGW Windows Libjpeg-turbo library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710101 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-06-02 15:46:07 EDT --- I just copied over the %doc line from the native libjpeg-turbo package, so it contains stuff like readme, the changelog and the license. All other documentation was excluded from this package. Anyway, thanks for reviewing and approving the package! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-libjpeg-turbo Short Description: MinGW Windows cross compiled Libjpeg-turbo library Owners: epienbro kalev rjones Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw June 2011