May 2012 - mingw - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 786151] New: Review request: mingw-pkg-config - MinGW Windows pkg-config tool for cross compiling
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: mingw-pkg-config - MinGW Windows pkg-config tool for cross compiling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786151 Summary: Review request: mingw-pkg-config - MinGW Windows pkg-config tool for cross compiling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw-pkg-config.spec SRPM URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw-pkg-config-0.26-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: The pkgconfig tool determines compilation options. For each required library, it reads the configuration file and outputs the necessary compiler and linker flags. This package contains pkg-config tool for cross compiling with the MinGW toolchain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 599567] New: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567 Summary: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: eblake(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: mingw32-gcc currently drags in a dependency on mingw32-pthreads, which in turn forces some namespace pollution due to its buggy <pthread.h> header. It would be much nicer if the mingw32-pthreads package remained optional, since it can interfere with cross-compilation efforts to mingw. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-gcc-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-10.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install mingw32-gcc Actual results: mingw32-pthreads gets sucked in as a required dependency to the cross-compiler. Expected results: Mere presence of the cross-compiler shouldn't force the existence of a broken <pthread.h>. Either the compiler needs to be built without mingw32-pthreads, or mingw32-pthreads needs to be split into two packages (runtime dependency of the compiler, vs. development library that installs <pthread.h> for situations that actually want to use this library in spite of its current upstream flaws). Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 641423] New: mingw32-gcc installs files both inside and outside the sysroot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-gcc installs files both inside and outside the sysroot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641423 Summary: mingw32-gcc installs files both inside and outside the sysroot Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pbonzini(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: mingw32-gcc is a strange hybrid package that installs files both inside and outside the sysroot. The files in the sysroot should be separated in mingw32-libgcc. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-gcc-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 Additional info: This makes the following packages depend incorrectly on mingw32-gcc: * mingw32-gettext (directly) * mingw32-pthreads (directly) * mingw32-atk (indirectly) * mingw32-glib2 (indirectly) * mingw32-gtk2 (indirectly) * mingw32-pango (indirectly) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 623338] New: mingw32-glib2 may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-glib2 may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623338 Summary: mingw32-glib2 may need to be rebuilt against Python 2.7 in F14 and rawhide Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-glib2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 623233 Blocks: 619913 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically-filed bug. mingw32-glib2-2.24.1-1.fc14 contains one or more .pyc files, but has not been rebuilt since Python 2.7 was built for Fedora, and thus the .pyc files presumably are for Python 2.6. Python 2.7 changed the bytecode format, so usage of those files will typically fail (see e.g. bug 621726). The package needs to be rebuilt against python 2.7 in both F14 and devel. Information on the new "dist-git" system can be seen here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT Information on common difficulties with Python 2.7 rebuilds can be seen here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7 Once it's been successfully rebuilt for F14, an update needs to be filed to get the rebuild into F14: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/ Please add this bug to the update, to make it easy to track what's been done, and what's left to do. I'm sorry that this component was not handled by the mass rebuild. (This may be due to bug 623233) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 795700] New: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [epel-5]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [epel-5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795700 Summary: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [epel-5] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: mingw32-libxml2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: huzaifas(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, veillard(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 787067 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=787067 epel-5 tracking bug for mingw32-libxml2: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s). [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 721312] New: CVE-2011-2690 libpng: buffer overwrite in png_rgb_to_gray [epel-5]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2011-2690 libpng: buffer overwrite in png_rgb_to_gray [epel-5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721312 Summary: CVE-2011-2690 libpng: buffer overwrite in png_rgb_to_gray [epel-5] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: mingw32-libpng AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: huzaifas(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 720607 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- epel-5 tracking bug for mingw32-libpng: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s). This bug is never intended to be made public, please put any public notes in the 'blocks' bugs. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 795426] New: cannot link with _ftime_s
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 May '14

30 May '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cannot link with _ftime_s https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795426 Summary: cannot link with _ftime_s Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cfergeau(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalevlember(a)gmail.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- // $ i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -Wimplicit-function-declaration ./ftime.c // // /tmp/ccdYAiqO.o:ftime.c:(.text+0x16): undefined reference to`_imp___ftime_s' // collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status // // No warning, this means the function is declared in headers (gcc -E shows // it comes from sec_api/sys/timeb_s.h) but it's not available at link time. /* $ rpm -qa mingw32* mingw32-binutils-2.22.51-3.fc17_cross.x86_64 mingw32-gcc-4.7.0-0.3.20120123.fc16_cross.x86_64 mingw32-filesystem-92-1.fc18_cross.noarch mingw32-cpp-4.7.0-0.3.20120123.fc16_cross.x86_64 mingw32-headers-2.0.999-0.1.trunk.20120120.fc17_cross.noarch mingw32-crt-2.0.999-0.3.trunk.20120124.fc17_cross.noarch mingw32-gcc-c++-4.7.0-0.3.20120123.fc16_cross.x86_64 */ #include <stdlib.h> // for NULL #include <sys/timeb.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { _ftime_s(NULL); return 0; } -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 798329] New: Unowned folders in mingw32-filesystem (and perhaps other pkgs)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '13

10 Aug '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unowned folders in mingw32-filesystem (and perhaps other pkgs) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798329 Summary: Unowned folders in mingw32-filesystem (and perhaps other pkgs) Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: mingw32-filesystem AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, kalevlember(a)gmail.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, drizt(a)land.ru Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- After upgrading to the mingw-w64 based toolchain several empty folders are left behind: $ find /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/ /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/ /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/etc /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/GL /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gio /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gio/modules /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ar /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/as /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/as/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ast /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ast/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/az /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/be /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/bg /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/bn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/bn_IN /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/bs /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ca /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ca@valencia /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ca@valencia/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/cs /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/cy /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/cy/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/da /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/de /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/dz /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/dz/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/el /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/en@shaw /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/en@shaw/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/en_CA /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/en_CA/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/en_GB /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/eo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/es /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/et /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/eu /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/fa /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/fi /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/fr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ga /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ga/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/gl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/gu /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/gu/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/he /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/hi /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/hi/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/hr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/hr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/hu /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/id /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/it /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ja /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/kn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/kn/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ko /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/lt /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/lt/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/lv /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/lv/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mai /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mai/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mg /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mg/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mk/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ml /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ml/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/mr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ms /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ms/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/nb /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ne /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ne/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/nl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/nn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/oc /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/oc/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/or /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/or/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/pa /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/pa/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/pl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/pt /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/pt_BR /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ro /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ru /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/rw /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/rw/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/si /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/si/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sq /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sq/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sr@latin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sr@latin/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sv /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ta /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/te /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/te/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/th /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/tr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ug /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/ug/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/uk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/vi /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/xh /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/xh/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/zh_CN /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/zh_HK /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/zh_TW /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/sbin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/aclocal /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/cmake /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/libasprintf /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/info /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/pkgconfig /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/themes /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/xml /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ca /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cs /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/da /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/el /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en@boldquot /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en@boldquot/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en@quot /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en@quot/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/es /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/et /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eu /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fi /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ga /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ga/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/id /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/it /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ja /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ko /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nb /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt_BR /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ro /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ru /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sv /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_CN /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_HK /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_TW /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/af /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/af/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/am /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/am/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ar /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/as /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/as/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ast /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ast/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/az /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be@latin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be@latin/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bg /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bn_IN /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bs /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ca@valencia /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ca@valencia/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cy /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cy/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/dz /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/dz/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en@shaw /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en@shaw/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en_CA /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en_CA/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en_GB /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fa /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gu /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gu/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/he /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hi /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hi/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hu /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hy /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hy/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/is /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ka /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ka/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/kk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/kk/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/kn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/kn/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ku /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ku/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lt /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lt/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lv /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lv/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mai /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mai/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mg /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mg/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mk/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ml /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ml/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ms /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ms/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nds /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nds/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ne /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ne/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/oc /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/oc/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/or /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/or/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pa /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pa/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ps /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ps/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/rw /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/rw/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/si /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/si/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sq /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sq/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr@ije /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr@ije/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr@latin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr@latin/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ta /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/te /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/te/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/th /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tl/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tt /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tt/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ug /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ug/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/wa /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/wa/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/xh /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/xh/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/yi /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/yi/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/li /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/li/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tk/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ang/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/br /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/br/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/crh /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/crh/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ia /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ia/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/io /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/io/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mi /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mi/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/my /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/my/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nso /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nso/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uz /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uz/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uz@cyrillic /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uz@cyrillic/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zu /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zu/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/az_IR /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/az_IR/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ur /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ur/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gr/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/kg /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/kg/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lg /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lg/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eu_ES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eu_ES/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lo/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi_VN /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi_VN/LC_MESSAGES /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/glib-2.0 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/glib-2.0/schemas /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gtk-doc /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/gtk-doc/html /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/common-lisp /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/common-lisp/source /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/common-lisp/source/gpg-error /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/libexec These folders should be owned by mingw32-filesystem (and perhaps other pkgs) in F15 and F16 to make sure everything is cleaned up when updating to the mingw-w64 based tree. The /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled should be fixed in mingw32-glib2 (a %ghost should be sufficient I think) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 755814] New: CVE-2011-0216 libxml2: Off-by-one error leading to heap-based buffer overflow in encoding [fedora-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '13

14 Feb '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2011-0216 libxml2: Off-by-one error leading to heap-based buffer overflow in encoding [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755814 Summary: CVE-2011-0216 libxml2: Off-by-one error leading to heap-based buffer overflow in encoding [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: low Priority: low Component: mingw32-libxml2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: huzaifas(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, veillard(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, drizt(a)land.ru Blocks: 724906 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=724906 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 749175] New: CVE-2011-3256 FreeType FT_Bitmap_New integer overflow to buffer overflow, FreeType TT_Vary_Get_Glyph_Deltas improper input validation [fedora-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '13

14 Feb '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2011-3256 FreeType FT_Bitmap_New integer overflow to buffer overflow, FreeType TT_Vary_Get_Glyph_Deltas improper input validation [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749175 Summary: CVE-2011-3256 FreeType FT_Bitmap_New integer overflow to buffer overflow, FreeType TT_Vary_Get_Glyph_Deltas improper input validation [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Component: mingw32-freetype AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rcvalle(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 746226 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product. Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=746226 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please only close it when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 799398] New: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '13

14 Feb '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799398 Summary: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: mingw32-SDL AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: salsaman(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: Compilation is broken Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: Create a dll which is statically linked with SDL, as follows: bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -fPIC -DPIC -DIS_MINGW=1 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -Dmain=SDL_main -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL -g -O2 -Wall -shared -fPIC -DPIC -module -avoid-version --tag=disable-static -no-undefined -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDLmain.a -o SDL.la -rpath "/usr/lib/lives/plugins/playback/video" SDL_la-SDL.lo libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -shared .libs/SDL_la-SDL.o -O2 -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDLmain.a -o .libs/SDL.dll -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base -Xlinker --out-implib -Xlinker .libs/SDL.dll.a This creates SDL.dll in .libs. No warnings are given about missing functions. Actual results: When SDL.dll is loaded and run under wine, it crashes with: wine: Call from 0x7bc4c100 to unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init, aborting wine: Unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init called at address 0x7bc4c100 (thread 0023), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init called in 32-bit code (0x7bc4c100). Expected results: SDL_Init should be found inside libSDL.dll.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 795699] New: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '13

14 Feb '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795699 Summary: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: mingw32-libxml2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: huzaifas(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, veillard(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, drizt(a)land.ru Blocks: 787067 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=787067 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 806271] New: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '13

28 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806271 Summary: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Component: mingw32-freetype AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: thoger(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 800607 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=800607 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 657478] New: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jun '12

20 Jun '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478 Summary: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some packages Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-filesystem AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: waananen(a)nbi.dk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, drizt(a)land.ru Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I'm using a custom build of mingw32-python in order to build Python bindings for a software package. For this packages the code in macros.mingw32 breaks: ... for i in `ls %{_mingw32_bindir}/*|grep -- "-config\$"` ; do \ x=`basename $i|tr "a-z+-" "A-ZX_"`; \ declare -x $x="$i" ; export $x; \ done; \ ... The variable name $x contains a ('.') when it finds the python2.x-config script in %{_mingw32_bindir}. One could imagine that this problem could be triggered on other *-config scripts. The fix is easy: filter away dots ('.') from the filename when generating the variable name (eg. |cut -d '.'). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): I found this in Fedora 12, but it seems applicable to Fedora 14. How reproducible: Build a package which requires mingw32-python. The mingw32-python does not yet exist in Fedora (unfortunately). Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Package build fails Expected results: Package should build Additional info: Cheers Anders -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 May '12

31 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #3 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #2) > The new approved MinGW packaging guidelines can be found at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGWCrossCompiler > > Some initial review comments: > - Please change %?mingw_package_header to %{?mingw_package_header} Done. > - Please remove the use of the _cross_pkg_name global I changed this to _pkg_name to avoid confusion with the generic cross-compile system. > - Please add BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 and BuildRequires: > mingw64-filesystem >= 95 Done. > - Why are the binary packages named mingw32-clucene-core and > mingw-64-clucene-core instead of just mingw32-clucene and mingw64-clucene? This is in keeping with the standard Fedora packages which are named "clucene-core" and "clucene-contribs-lib". This package contains only the -core libraries and not the contribs. Just trying to maintain consistency with the native packages in Fedora. > - Please replace the %{description} tags with the complete description. Last > time I used this tag it didn't produce the expected result That's a shame. The %{description} usage was copied wholesale from the native spec file for the existing Fedora packages. > - Why is multithreading disabled? The package will not compile in 64-bit with threading enabled, and I ran into issues with the package's detection of the 32-bit pthread headers. It seems to be an upstream bug which I'd be happy to look into later, but for the time being it is (to me) less important than getting the library functioning properly. > - Why do you set the CFLAGS _CL_HAVE_WIN32_THREADS=0 ? Is support for win32 > threads disabled by this? I have found that setting this and the other multi-threading option are necessary to disable threading in a win32 build. > - Why is LUCENE_STATIC_CONSTANT_SYNTAX_EXITCODE set to 1 and the other > defines to 0? This is inherited from the original SuSE packages that I built my old Ubuntu mingw clucene package off of. I can only guess it is because this feature is supported whereas the others are not. CLucene's cross-platform detection does not seem to be as robust as it ought, so it needs a few of these options defined manually. Last time I tried building without this option the library did not build properly. > - The 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' can be removed from the %install section as > it's not needed any more Done > - The quotes used in %mingw_make call aren't needed any more and can be > removed Done > - The %defattr tags aren't needed any more with modern RPM and can also be > removed Done > > I'm not a Fedora sponsor, so I can't formally approve this package. > rwmjones: would you be interested in sponsoring Greg? Thanks for the review. I have uploaded an updated spec and src.rpm file to the same URLs as above if anyone else wants to take a look. rwmjones said on Freenode he is overburdened with sponsorees already. I'm still looking for a package sponsor for this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 May '12

30 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- The new approved MinGW packaging guidelines can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGWCrossCompiler Some initial review comments: - Please change %?mingw_package_header to %{?mingw_package_header} - Please remove the use of the _cross_pkg_name global - Please add BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 and BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 - Why are the binary packages named mingw32-clucene-core and mingw-64-clucene-core instead of just mingw32-clucene and mingw64-clucene? - Please replace the %{description} tags with the complete description. Last time I used this tag it didn't produce the expected result - Why is multithreading disabled? - Why do you set the CFLAGS _CL_HAVE_WIN32_THREADS=0 ? Is support for win32 threads disabled by this? - Why is LUCENE_STATIC_CONSTANT_SYNTAX_EXITCODE set to 1 and the other defines to 0? - The 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' can be removed from the %install section as it's not needed any more - The quotes used in %mingw_make call aren't needed any more and can be removed - The %defattr tags aren't needed any more with modern RPM and can also be removed I'm not a Fedora sponsor, so I can't formally approve this package. rwmjones: would you be interested in sponsoring Greg? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '12

29 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-cximage-600-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '12

29 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-cximage-600-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-cximage-600-5.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '12

29 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '12

29 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). cfergeau not added, not a valid FAS account, please correct and add in pkgdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '12

28 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-cximage Short Description: MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library Owners: elmarco epienbro cfergeau Branches: f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '12

28 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- $ rpmlint mingw-cximage.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw-cximage-600-4.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-cximage-600-4.fc17.noarch.rpm mingw32-cximage-static-600-4.fc17.noarch.rpm mingw64-cximage-600-4.fc17.noarch.rpm mingw64-cximage-static-600-4.fc17.noarch.rpm mingw32-cximage.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-cximage-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-cximage.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-cximage-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpm --query --requires mingw32-cximage mingw32(gdi32.dll) mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll) mingw32(libjasper-1.dll) mingw32(libjpeg-62.dll) mingw32(libpng15-15.dll) mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll) mingw32(libtiff-3.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(user32.dll) mingw32-crt mingw32-filesystem >= 83 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --requires mingw64-cximage mingw64(gdi32.dll) mingw64(kernel32.dll) mingw64(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll) mingw64(libjasper-1.dll) mingw64(libjpeg-62.dll) mingw64(libpng15-15.dll) mingw64(libstdc++-6.dll) mingw64(libtiff-3.dll) mingw64(msvcrt.dll) mingw64(user32.dll) mingw64-crt mingw64-filesystem >= 83 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --provides mingw32-cximage mingw32(libcximage.dll) mingw32-cximage = 600-4.fc17 $ rpm --query --provides mingw64-cximage mingw64(libcximage.dll) mingw64-cximage = 600-4.fc17 $ wget --quiet http://sourceforge.net/projects/cximage/files/6.00/cximage600_full.7z -O - | md5sum 7c5141120cc849308f96702ce8e3c0eb - $ md5sum cximage600_full.7z 7c5141120cc849308f96702ce8e3c0eb cximage600_full.7z + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable [!] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines [+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-' [+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header} [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages [+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch [+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section [!] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4 to configure the package [!] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package [!] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package [/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used [+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated [+] Libtool .la files are not bundled [+] .def files are not bundled [+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal [+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal The license isn't bundled with this package yet. Please include this (CxImage/license.txt) and mark this as %doc before importing the package in Fedora The .spec file currently doesn't use one of the RPM macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, %mingw_cmake_kde4 or %mingw_make. As the upstream package only provides MSVC based project files and the library itself is quite small it's okay to use custom gcc calls to build this package This package is using cximage 6.00 (released in december 2010) while the latest available version is 7.02 (released in february 2011). You might want to consider to update to this latest version =================================================== The package mingw-cximage is APPROVED by epienbro =================================================== -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '12

27 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 greg.hellings(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org --- Comment #1 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- The MinGW pages on the wiki ask for a link to my scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4107116 And to add the appropriate email for the group to the CC, which I'm also doing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 May '12

26 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-26 04:00:51 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 May '12

26 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-26 03:57:39 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-orc-0.4.16-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 May '12

26 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.3.rc2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 May '12

26 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-26 02:53:51 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusbx - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 May '12

24 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-libusbx-1.0.11-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[mingw-libxml2/f17] Update to 2.8.0
by Erik van Pienbroek 23 May '12

23 May '12

Summary of changes: 6e3a17f... Update to 2.8.0 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent

1 0

[mingw-libxml2] Update to 2.8.0
by Erik van Pienbroek 23 May '12

23 May '12

commit 6e3a17f7dd458e591a7a4d1fa5328ea15a677b45 Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Wed May 23 22:21:18 2012 +0200 Update to 2.8.0 .gitignore | 1 + libxml2-2.7.7-xpath-double-free.patch | 22 ---------------------- libxml2-gnome-bug-561340-fix.patch | 11 ----------- mingw-libxml2.spec | 21 ++++++--------------- sources | 2 +- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index a9e0040..7f698ba 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ libxml2-2.7.6.tar.gz /libxml2-2.7.8.tar.gz +/libxml2-2.8.0.tar.gz diff --git a/mingw-libxml2.spec b/mingw-libxml2.spec index c4be53b..8301cc0 100644 --- a/mingw-libxml2.spec +++ b/mingw-libxml2.spec @@ -1,11 +1,8 @@ -%?mingw_package_header - -%global mingw_build_win32 1 -%global mingw_build_win64 1 +%{?mingw_package_header} Name: mingw-libxml2 -Version: 2.7.8 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Version: 2.8.0 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library License: MIT @@ -13,16 +10,9 @@ Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://xmlsoft.org/ Source0: ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-%{version}.tar.gz -# Not required for MinGW. -#Patch0: libxml2-multilib.patch -Patch2: libxml2-2.7.7-xpath-double-free.patch - # MinGW-specific patches. Patch1001: mingw32-libxml2-static-build-compile-fix.patch -# Patch is needed to get DTD validation working (GNOME BZ #663588) -Patch1002: libxml2-gnome-bug-561340-fix.patch - BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 @@ -83,9 +73,7 @@ Static version of the MinGW Windows XML processing library. %prep %setup -q -n libxml2-%{version} -%patch2 -p1 -b .CVE-2010-4494 %patch1001 -p0 -%patch1002 -p0 %build @@ -160,6 +148,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.la" -delete %changelog +* Wed May 23 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.8.0-1 +- Update to 2.8.0 + * Sat Mar 10 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.7.8-7 - Added win64 support diff --git a/sources b/sources index 4e904ff..caedfc9 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -8127a65e8c3b08856093099b52599c86 libxml2-2.7.8.tar.gz +c62106f02ee00b6437f0fb9d370c1093 libxml2-2.8.0.tar.gz

1 0

File libxml2-2.8.0.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by epienbro
by Erik van Pienbroek 23 May '12

23 May '12

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mingw-libxml2: c62106f02ee00b6437f0fb9d370c1093 libxml2-2.8.0.tar.gz

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusbx - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-libusbx-1.0.11-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-libusbx-1.0.11-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusbx - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 --- Comment #5 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to comment #4) > Please bump the release tag in the .spec file every time you make a change > instead of replacing the old version. This makes it harder to compare > revisions ok, didn't know about that > I just took a look at the debug issue. It seems to be caused by the fact > that some RPM variables aren't set automatically as you don't have a %setup > tag in the %prep section. It is possible to use this tag without having it > trying to extract source files. You can try to add these lines just after > the 7za command: > cd .. > %setup -q -T -D -n %{name}-%{version} > > With this change, some of the 'cd' calls in other sections can be removed as > they're unneeded Indeed, works, thanks > > In your original .spec file you tried to install the .dll files to libdir > and name it .dll.a, but that isn't going to work. In your latest .spec file > you already seem to have resolved this issue and also made it generate an > import library which is good. Your original .spec file also missed an > %{?mingw_debug_package} line, but you seem to have added this in your latest > spec file. Again, please bump the release tag and publish a new .src.rpm > every time you make a change hmm, I guess that was an outdated srpm. Fixed ones uploaded: http://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/mingw-cximage.spec http://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/mingw-cximage-600-4.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusbx - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Corrected Hans' FAS username. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- Please bump the release tag in the .spec file every time you make a change instead of replacing the old version. This makes it harder to compare revisions I just took a look at the debug issue. It seems to be caused by the fact that some RPM variables aren't set automatically as you don't have a %setup tag in the %prep section. It is possible to use this tag without having it trying to extract source files. You can try to add these lines just after the 7za command: cd .. %setup -q -T -D -n %{name}-%{version} With this change, some of the 'cd' calls in other sections can be removed as they're unneeded In your original .spec file you tried to install the .dll files to libdir and name it .dll.a, but that isn't going to work. In your latest .spec file you already seem to have resolved this issue and also made it generate an import library which is good. Your original .spec file also missed an %{?mingw_debug_package} line, but you seem to have added this in your latest spec file. Again, please bump the release tag and publish a new .src.rpm every time you make a change -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusbx - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-libusbx Short Description: MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices Owners: elmarco epienbro hdegoede Branches: f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > The unpack procedure in the %prep section is a bit odd, but I guess this is > > caused by the fact that current RPM doesn't support 7zip archives yet. > > Yes, I know cfergeau(a)redhat.com has been working on a rpm patch. It's merged http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git;a=commit;h=185596818f763af1249f19161f38134e… , I've asked Panu if we could get this backported to f17 rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusbx - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- (In reply to comment #3) > - Does not own all directories that it creates! > The mingw32-* and mingw64-* packages install files under > /usr/i686-w64-mingw32 resp /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32 And subdirs under these > dirs which no packages own, therefor the mingw32-* and mingw64-* packages > should have a Requires on mingw32-filesystem resp mingw64-filesystem. This > seems to be an oversight in the mingw packaging guidelines which are missing > these requires in their example specfile too. Can you please discuss this > with the other mingw packaging folks? Hi Hans, The Requires tags for mingw32-filesystem and mingw64-filesystem are added automatically by the %{?mingw_package_header} macro. This macro overrides the default RPM find requires script with /usr/lib/rpm/mingw-find-requires.sh which automatically adds the proper requires tags for mingw packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusbx - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> --- Full review done: Good: -------- - rpmlint checks return: mingw32-libusbx-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw32-libusbx-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-libusbx-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-libusbx-static.noarch: W: no-documentation ^^These are all expected for mingw packages, so no problem here ^^ - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales properly handled - not relocatable - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Should fix: --------------- - rpmlint checks return: mingw-libusbx.src: W: strange-permission libusbx-1.0.11.tar.bz2 0640L Please fix before import - rpmlint checks return: mingw32-libusbx.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mingw32-libusbx-1.0.11/ChangeLog mingw64-libusbx.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mingw64-libusbx-1.0.11/ChangeLog The ChangeLog file is not that interesting anyways, it says: "For the latest change log, please visit: http://libusbx.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=libusbx/libusbx;a=log" So I suggest just dropping it. - There is a "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in your %install, this is not needed with modern rpm versions, and should not be there unless you also manually specify a buildroot and have a manual %clean section - Does not own all directories that it creates! The mingw32-* and mingw64-* packages install files under /usr/i686-w64-mingw32 resp /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32 And subdirs under these dirs which no packages own, therefor the mingw32-* and mingw64-* packages should have a Requires on mingw32-filesystem resp mingw64-filesystem. This seems to be an oversight in the mingw packaging guidelines which are missing these requires in their example specfile too. Can you please discuss this with the other mingw packaging folks? No blockers -> Approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 --- Comment #2 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Taking for review > > - The BuildRoot tag, the entire %clean section and the %defattr tags in the > %files sections aren't needed any more with modern RPM and can be removed > - Please remove the use of the %{summary} macro and give the -static > subpackages a more proper summary thanks, done > The unpack procedure in the %prep section is a bit odd, but I guess this is > caused by the fact that current RPM doesn't support 7zip archives yet. Yes, I know cfergeau(a)redhat.com has been working on a rpm patch. > The %mingw_debug_install_post call in the %install section shouldn't be > necessary. As it already contains a FIXME comment I'll try to investigate > this issue here As I say in the spec, I have no idea why we need to call it ourself, I would be glad to get some help, as I don't know how to debug this one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusbx - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusb1 - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 --- Comment #2 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> --- Spec URL: http://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/mingw-libusbx.spec SRPM URL: http://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/mingw-libusbx-1.0.9-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: This package provides a way for applications to access USB devices. Fedora Account System Username: elmarco -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- Taking for review - The BuildRoot tag, the entire %clean section and the %defattr tags in the %files sections aren't needed any more with modern RPM and can be removed - Please remove the use of the %{summary} macro and give the -static subpackages a more proper summary The unpack procedure in the %prep section is a bit odd, but I guess this is caused by the fact that current RPM doesn't support 7zip archives yet. The %mingw_debug_install_post call in the %install section shouldn't be necessary. As it already contains a FIXME comment I'll try to investigate this issue here -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusb1 - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '12

22 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |hdegoede(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> --- Hi, I'll review this, but first can you please re-spin the package to be based on libusbx? libusbx is a fork of libusb by most of the libusb developers for various reasons. The developers behind the fork include yours truly, as well as the windows maintainer, making libusbx a better starting point for a mingw package. Notice that the regular Fedora libusb package is also moving over to libusbx, see bug 823886 for the Rename Review Request for that, including the new specfile for a libusbx based Fedora libusb package. Regards, Hans -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 823623] Review Request: mingw-libusb1 - MinGW library which allows userspace access to USB devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '12

21 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823623 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 820729] Review Request: mingw-cximage - MinGW Windows CxImage manipulation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 May '12

21 May '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 822312] -fstack-protector-all results in dynamic dependency on libssp-0.dll
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '12

18 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822312 --- Comment #6 from Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-18 12:40:43 EDT --- If you say so— though this simply isn't the behavior it has on native binaries: [gmaxwell@helmholtz tmp]$ gcc test.c -o test -fstack-protector-all [gmaxwell@helmholtz tmp]$ ldd test linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffc618e000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000038ef600000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000038ef200000) Though yes indeed, it confuses the heck out of libtool which actually was my problem in getting it to produce a static binary— intermediate libraries were introducing the dynamic dependency when -static was only set at the final linking stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 822312] -fstack-protector-all results in dynamic dependency on libssp-0.dll
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '12

18 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822312 --- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz <ktietz(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-18 12:30:13 EDT --- This expectation is not correct. By default gcc uses shared (means on Windoze DLL) libraries. As libssp is built as DLL version and as static version, of course it uses by default the shared one. If you want to force static version of a library, then you need to add it explicit to the linker. Also be aware that in combination with libtool things might get weird about static/shared, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 822312] -fstack-protector-all results in dynamic dependency on libssp-0.dll
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '12

18 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822312 --- Comment #4 from Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-18 10:41:29 EDT --- To clarify: I mean I expect ssp to be static no matter if -static is set or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 822312] -fstack-protector-all results in dynamic dependency on libssp-0.dll
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '12

18 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822312 --- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz <ktietz(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-18 10:03:05 EDT --- hmm, by using '-static' option on gcc's frontend, it is absolutely to be expected that only the static-libraries are linked. This is true as long as there is a .dll.a and a .a library of same name present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 822312] -fstack-protector-all results in dynamic dependency on libssp-0.dll
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 May '12

17 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822312 --- Comment #2 from Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-17 10:06:32 EDT --- Hm. I'll see what distinguishes our test cases and report back… since being able to manually make it static would be a big improvement. But I don't believe that libssp-0 being static with -static is the expected behavior in any case. That would be like dynamically linking libgcc. On the native Linux binaries you never see libssp dynamically linked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 822312] -fstack-protector-all results in dynamic dependency on libssp-0.dll
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 May '12

17 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822312 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '12

14 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-14 11:55:33 EDT --- mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '12

13 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #9 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> 2012-05-12 18:57:14 EDT --- Re: How does one get something linked against the LLVM-3.0.dll Pretty much the same way one builds a Windows application linked against any other MinGW DLL. In this case, using /usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32-llvm-config in the same way that pkg-config might be used for building against MinGW libraries that include a .pc file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

non-static ".a" files? (mingw-pthreads)
by Eric Smith 13 May '12

13 May '12

If a mingw package build produces a ".a" file that is not usable as a static library, is there any reason to include that ".a" file in the package at all? The specific case I'm wondering about is mingw-pthreads. I need a static version, and mingw-pthreads needs special attention to build a static version. The current package does include ".a" files in the package, but they're definitely not static. Would it be appropriate to just leave those out, and build actual static ".a" libraries to be put into a "-static" subpackage? Thanks! Eric

2 3

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '12

13 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #8 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> 2012-05-12 18:42:37 EDT --- The purpose of mingw-llvm is to be able to build applications for Windows that use the LLVM libraries, e.g., if they want to use the LLVM JIT capabilities. Such an app might possibly also be able to emit bitcode or even native code files, though that isn't what I use it for personally. The purpose of static libraries is to allow such programs to be built statically, to avoid having to distribute them with a bunch of DLLs (including but not limited to the LLVM DLLs). In other words, exactly the same reason as for packaging any other mingnn-*-static subpackage. I don't have any clue what an "llvm.exe" would do, even if it existed, which AFAIK it doesn't. Certainly this package doesn't contain one. The various .exe files that are in this package may or may not be useful to people that use applications built with mingw-llvm, depending on exactly what those applications do. I've had occasion to use a few of them. I could remove them from the package, and only include the libraries, but I thought that as long as the exe files were built and work, there was little advantage to not packaging them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '12

13 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones(a)redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-12 18:26:56 EDT --- As epienbro says, what's the point? There should perhaps be an llvm cross-compiler, ie. a native llvm binary that can generate Windows executables, but I don't see much point in an llvm.exe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '12

12 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2012-05-12 17:17:37 EDT --- Perhaps I'm misunderstanding things, but what is the use case for this package? Is llvm.exe and the other tools intended to be called using wine? How does one get something linked against the LLVM-3.0.dll or is this only intended as direct dependency of the llvm.exe and the other tools? What purpose do the static libraries have? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '12

12 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-12 15:44:54 EDT --- mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '12

12 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEW CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '12

12 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-12 12:34:40 EDT --- mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.3.rc2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.3.rc2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '12

12 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-11 11:37:45 EDT --- mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-11 09:24:38 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2012-05-11 09:22:25 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free Short Description: Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad" Owners: mooninite Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 --- Comment #11 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2012-05-11 09:21:16 EDT --- Thanks, Hans. The obsoletes are provided because this package is being imported from the "fedora-cross" repo, which was a temporary MinGW-w64 repo, and this package provided a -static sub-package at one time. It has been decided to not provide -static for the gstreamer plugins packages so to help "fedora-cross" users migrate to F17 proper, I am placing obsoletes in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 813064] MinGW Qt application doesn't linked with openssl at runtime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813064 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|mingw32-qt-4.7.4-2.fc15 |mingw32-qt-4.8.1-1.fc16 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-11 06:32:58 EDT --- mingw32-qt-4.8.1-1.fc16, mingw32-qt-qmake-4.8.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 813064] MinGW Qt application doesn't linked with openssl at runtime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813064 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mingw32-qt-4.7.4-2.fc15 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-11 06:22:27 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-11 06:22:27 EDT --- mingw32-qt-4.7.4-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-11 05:06:50 EDT --- Full review done: Good: -------- - rpmlint checks return: mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources ^^These are all expected for mingw packages, so no problem here ^^ mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23/COPYING mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23/COPYING mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free. mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free. ^^ and these can be safely ignored too ^^ - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales properly handled - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Remarks: ------------- - rpmlint checks return: mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static Were there ever mingw*-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static packages in Fedora? If not I suggest removing the 2 Obsoletes. No blockers: APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #4 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> 2012-05-11 03:53:48 EDT --- Updated to fix a problem in the llvm-config script, which was attempting to be clever in determining the include and library paths, depending on whether the script was being run from the build directory. In this package it was computing the wrong path, so it has been patched to always simply use the configured PREFIX. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/mingw-llvm/mingw-llvm.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/mingw-llvm/mingw-llvm-3.0-3.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build for f17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4069804 Note that the mingw-llvm-static subpackage is not useful without a static subpackage of libffi. I have modified the spec for mingw-libffi to create the static subpackage and verify that it works. I have sent a patch to Erik van Pienbroek requesting that he add it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 724906] CVE-2011-0216 libxml2: Off-by-one error leading to heap-based buffer overflow in encoding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724906 Michal Nowak <mnowak(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |820846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-10 16:38:09 EDT --- mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-10 12:35:10 EDT --- mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 --- Comment #9 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2012-05-10 12:00:31 EDT --- Sorry for wasting your time on that last package. I didn't take time out to run a build. This new package should be good to go. Spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.spec SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.2… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalevlember(a)gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-10 11:41:54 EDT --- We removed most of the .la files from mingw packages during the mingw.org -> mingw-w64 toolchain transition in F17. See this post for some background info: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2012-January/004421.html Regarding the guidelines, I am not sure why it's taking so long to get the official pages updated. The draft was approved 3 weeks ago and I've pinged the FPC again this Monday: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/163 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-10 10:56:44 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-10 10:53:34 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-spice-gtk Short Description: Cross-compiled client libraries for SPICE Owners: elmarco epienbro rjones Branches: f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-10 10:42:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > From what I know, all the mignw64 packages remove the libtool files, as > proposed in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGWCrossCompiler Ah I hadn't found that page with even newer guidelines, good! APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 --- Comment #2 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-10 10:34:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Needs-work: > ----------------- > - you remove all .la files, but non of the other mingw packages I have seen do > that, so it is probably better to not do that. Note, this seems something which > is under discussion: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues > But as said I believe for now it is best to just keep the .la files there. >From what I know, all the mignw64 packages remove the libtool files, as proposed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGWCrossCompiler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |hdegoede(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |hdegoede(a)redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-10 10:17:30 EDT --- Full review done: Good: -------- - rpmlint checks return: mingw32-spice-glib.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency mingw32-glib2 mingw32-spice-glib.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr x86_64-w64-mingw32 mingw32-spice-gtk.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-spice-gtk-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw32-spice-gtk-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-spice-gtk3.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-spice-glib.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency mingw64-glib2 mingw64-spice-glib.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-w64-mingw32 mingw64-spice-gtk.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-spice-gtk-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-spice-gtk-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-spice-gtk3.noarch: W: no-documentation 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 8 warnings. ^^These are all expected for mingw packages, so no problem here ^^ - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales properly handled - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Needs-work: ----------------- - you remove all .la files, but non of the other mingw packages I have seen do that, so it is probably better to not do that. Note, this seems something which is under discussion: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues But as said I believe for now it is best to just keep the .la files there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-10 09:27:40 EDT --- Does not build as is (with a local build on a fully up2date Fedora-17): There are a number of different problems: 1) The following files are named "bin/libgstfoo-0.10-23.dll" rather then: "bin/libgstfoo-0.10-0.dll": bin/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-0.10-0.dll bin/libgstbasevideo-0.10-0.dll bin/libgstphotography-0.10-0.dll bin/libgstsignalprocessor-0.10-0.dll 2) The following files are not listed in %files, but do get installed: bin/libgstcodecparsers-0.10-23.dll lib/libgstcodecparsers-0.10.la lib/libgstcodecparsers-0.10.dll.a 3) The following files are in %files, but do not get build / installed: lib/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstinvtelecine.dll lib/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstmpeg4videoparse.dll 4) With the above fixed, rpmbuild will at least run to close to the end, but there are still more files which get installed but which are not in any %files: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/codecparsers/gsth264parser.h /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/codecparsers/gstmpeg4parser.h /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/codecparsers/gstmpegvideoparser.h /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/codecparsers/gstvc1parser.h /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/video/gstbasevideoutils.h /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/video/gstsurfacebuffer.h /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/video/gstsurfaceconverter.h /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/video/videocontext.h /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstaudiovisualizers.dll /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstfaceoverlay.dll /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstfreeverb.dll /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstinter.dll /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstremovesilence.dll /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstsmooth.dll /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstwininet.dll /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-0.10.a /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstbasevideo-0.10.a /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstcodecparsers-0.10.a /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstphotography-0.10.a /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstsignalprocessor-0.10.a /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gstreamer-basevideo-0.10.pc /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gstreamer-codecparsers-0.10.pc /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/codecparsers/gsth264parser.h /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/codecparsers/gstmpeg4parser.h /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/codecparsers/gstmpegvideoparser.h /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/codecparsers/gstvc1parser.h /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/video/gstbasevideoutils.h /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/video/gstsurfacebuffer.h /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/video/gstsurfaceconverter.h /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gstreamer-0.10/gst/video/videocontext.h /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstaudiovisualizers.dll /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstfaceoverlay.dll /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstfreeverb.dll /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstinter.dll /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstremovesilence.dll /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstsmooth.dll /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstwininet.dll /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-0.10.a /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstbasevideo-0.10.a /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstcodecparsers-0.10.a /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstcodecparsers-0.10.dll.a /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstcodecparsers-0.10.la /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstphotography-0.10.a /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstsignalprocessor-0.10.a /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gstreamer-basevideo-0.10.pc /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/gstreamer-codecparsers-0.10.pc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |hdegoede(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |hdegoede(a)redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-10 09:04:02 EDT --- I'll be reviewing this (Marc-André asked me too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 May '12

09 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #3 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> 2012-05-08 18:46:30 EDT --- Kalev Lember let me know that for MinGW packages it is expected that the debuginfo not include sources, so the error from rpmlint is not an issue: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2012-May/005299.html I've added a note about this to the MinGW/Rpmlint wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=MinGW/Rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819893] Review Request: mingw-gsl - MinGW Windows port of the GNU Scientific Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '12

08 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819893 --- Comment #1 from nucleo <alekcejk(a)googlemail.com> 2012-05-08 10:14:18 EDT --- Package builds in mock. See http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/mingw-gsl/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819893] Review Request: mingw-gsl - MinGW Windows port of the GNU Scientific Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '12

08 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819893 nucleo <alekcejk(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org Alias| |mingw-gsl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 587818] missing %{__strip} corrupts mingw binaries during rpmbuild
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '12

08 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587818 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2012-05-08 08:48:39 --- Comment #5 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-08 08:48:39 EDT --- Apparently this never got fixed in F14 which obviously is long into EOL by now, doh. Its fixed in Fedora >= 15 though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

preparing a mingw-llvm package; problems with %mingw_configure environment variables
by Eric Smith 08 May '12

08 May '12

I've finally found time to work on preparing a mingw-llvm-3.0 package, so that I can cross-compile a program that uses the LLVM libraries. I've run into a few problems that I could use some help with. 1) The %mingw_configure macro defines a bunch of environment variables such as AR, CXX, GCC, LD, etc., which interfere with building LLVM, because the LLVM build system already knows how to deal with cross-builds, but the env vars screw up some things that have to compiled and run on the build system. Is there any way to convince %mingw_configure not to set those variables? Or maybe an alternate macro that doesn't? For now, I use a patch to the LLVM configure script that unsets all those variables at the start, and then it builds fine for mingw32. 2) The LLVM build produces some .exe and .dll files in %{mingw_bindir}, but there aren't any .dll.a or .la files anywhere either in the BUILDROOT or in the BUILD tree. How are these supposed to be produced? For my own purposes I only need the static libraries in the -static subpackage, but obviously I need to fix this so that the DLLs are usable also. 3) Building for mingw64 fails with all sorts of undefined mangled C++ symbols. I think I'll need help from upstream with that. Is it OK to submit a package in the mean time that builds for mingw32 only? For now I've used "%global mingw_build_win64 0". That mostly works, until rpmbuild tries to generate debuginfo and provides, and apparently is still looking for an x86_64-w64-mingw32 directory, when all I have is i686-w64-mingw32. Is there something else I must do to convince it not to look for 64-bit stuff? find: `/home/eric/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mingw-llvm-3.0-1.fc16.x86_64/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw': No such file or directory error: failed to write all data to /usr/lib/rpm/mingw-find-debuginfo.sh: Broken pipe Finding Provides: /usr/lib/rpm/mingw-find-debuginfo.sh /home/eric/rpmbuild/BUILD/ mingw32 mingw64 error: Failed to find Provides: Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 RPM build errors: failed to write all data to /usr/lib/rpm/mingw-find-debuginfo.sh: Broken pipe Failed to find Provides: In case anyone is interested, I put the current almost-but-not-quite-working spec file and a build log at: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/mingw-llvm/ Thanks for any advice and help! Eric

2 5

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '12

08 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #2 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> 2012-05-08 03:19:14 EDT --- Here's the Koji scratch build for F17 for 3.0-2: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4061825 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '12

08 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #1 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> 2012-05-08 03:15:49 EDT --- Updated to fix optimization flags. Not sure why the debuginfo isn't picking up the sources; could use some help with that. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/mingw-llvm/mingw-llvm.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/mingw-llvm/mingw-llvm-3.0-2.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '12

08 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org AssignedTo|fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |oject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '12

08 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org Alias| |mingw-llvm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '12

08 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-07 18:26:03 EDT --- mingw-orc-0.4.16-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '12

07 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-07 09:43:38 EDT --- mingw-orc-0.4.16-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-orc-0.4.16-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '12

07 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '12

07 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-07 08:33:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '12

07 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-07 06:20:10 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-orc Short Description: Cross-compiled Oil Run-time Compiler Owners: elmarco epienbro rjones kalev Branches: f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Re: preparing a mingw-llvm package
by Eric Smith 07 May '12

07 May '12

I think I may have found why I'm not getting any .dll.a and .la files for mingw-llvm. "the LLVM source code lacks the symbol export directives, [...] The autoconf build exploits a feature of MinGW's binutils that auto-exports all symbols, like in Linux." [from the thread: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/45357 ] So is it acceptable to package mingw-llvm with the DLLs but without the .dll.a and .la files? The DLLs work fine with the EXEs in the package. Thanks, Eric

1 0

[Bug 812573] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins good
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '12

07 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812573 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mingw-gstreamer-plugins-goo | |d-0.10.31-5.fc17 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-07 00:18:10 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-07 00:18:10 EDT --- mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '12

07 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '12

07 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2012-05-06 21:36:13 EDT --- $ md5sum ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/orc-0.4.16.tar.gz e482932e544c847761449b106ecbc483 /home/michael/rpmbuild/SOURCES/orc-0.4.16.tar.gz $ wget --quiet http://code.entropywave.com/download/orc/orc-0.4.16.tar.gz -O - | md5sum e482932e544c847761449b106ecbc483 - $ rpmlint SPECS/mingw-orc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/mingw-orc-0.4.16-1.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/mingw64-orc-0.4.16-1.fc16.noarch.rpm RPMS/noarch/mingw64-orc-compiler-0.4.16-1.fc16.noarch.rpm mingw64-orc-compiler.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable [+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines [+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-' [+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header} [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages [+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch [+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section [+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4 to configure the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package [/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used [+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated [+] Libtool .la files are not bundled [+] .def files are not bundled [+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal [+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal The rpmlint warning about no docs can be ignored as the subpackage depends on the main package. Looks good. Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '12

07 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 --- Comment #2 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-06 19:50:17 EDT --- Created attachment 582514 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=582514 updated spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[mingw-glib2] Update to 2.33.1
by Erik van Pienbroek 05 May '12

05 May '12

commit bd58c6501690b0960c2e6480f9b5ad150af81a20 Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Sat May 5 19:47:40 2012 +0200 Update to 2.33.1 mingw-glib2.spec | 7 +++++-- sources | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/mingw-glib2.spec b/mingw-glib2.spec index ee2b5fb..fe4d553 100644 --- a/mingw-glib2.spec +++ b/mingw-glib2.spec @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ %?mingw_package_header Name: mingw-glib2 -Version: 2.32.2 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 2.33.1 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: MinGW Windows GLib2 library License: LGPLv2+ @@ -257,6 +257,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.la" -delete %changelog +* Sat May 05 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.33.1-1 +- Update to 2.33.1 + * Sat May 05 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.32.2-2 - Fix compile failure while building static library (GNOME BZ #675516) diff --git a/sources b/sources index 7f05da0..5065073 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -5bfdb6197afb90e4dbc7b1bb98f0eae0 glib-2.32.2.tar.xz +f620dce6e0e2d9d2835718b746f55448 glib-2.33.1.tar.xz

1 0

File glib-2.33.1.tar.xz uploaded to lookaside cache by epienbro
by Erik van Pienbroek 05 May '12

05 May '12

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mingw-glib2: f620dce6e0e2d9d2835718b746f55448 glib-2.33.1.tar.xz

1 0

[mingw-glib2/f17] (2 commits) ...Fix compile failure while building static library
by Erik van Pienbroek 05 May '12

05 May '12

Summary of changes: 06a68dd... Update to 2.32.2 (*) 3c3eb79... Fix compile failure while building static library (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent

1 0

[mingw-glib2] Fix compile failure while building static library
by Erik van Pienbroek 05 May '12

05 May '12

commit 3c3eb79fc3ee4f7e256559acbdc1737c774f6baf Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Sat May 5 19:35:31 2012 +0200 Fix compile failure while building static library ...rt-a-DBus-server-when-built-as-static-lib.patch | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++ mingw-glib2.spec | 10 ++++- 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/0001-Don-t-start-a-DBus-server-when-built-as-static-lib.patch b/0001-Don-t-start-a-DBus-server-when-built-as-static-lib.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a44de7d --- /dev/null +++ b/0001-Don-t-start-a-DBus-server-when-built-as-static-lib.patch @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +From f40b1bdb92a2a1d77bc7b451add6a587cc270100 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> +Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 18:10:47 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] Don't start a DBus server when built as static lib + +The new Win32 DBus server code which was recently introduced works +by retrieving the path of the gio DLL and using rundll32.exe to +create a new process which starts a DBus server using the gio DLL. + +This doesn't work when GLib is built as a static library as there is no +gio DLL available in that case. Therefore the code which tries to start +a DBus server using the above steps doesn't have to be executed as it +will always fail. + +This commit makes sure that no attempt is done to start a DBus server when +using a static compiled GLib and that a proper error message is automatically +returned to the caller. This also fixes a compilation failure which occurs +when GLib is compiled as static library +--- + gio/gdbusaddress.c | 4 ++++ + 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) + +diff --git a/gio/gdbusaddress.c b/gio/gdbusaddress.c +index 4aa13b9..5fba139 100644 +--- a/gio/gdbusaddress.c ++++ b/gio/gdbusaddress.c +@@ -1390,6 +1390,8 @@ get_session_address_dbus_launch (GError **error) + + release_mutex (init_mutex); + ++#ifdef DLL_EXPORT ++ + if (address == NULL) + { + gio_path[MAX_PATH] = 0; +@@ -1428,6 +1430,8 @@ get_session_address_dbus_launch (GError **error) + } + } + ++#endif ++ + release_mutex (autolaunch_mutex); + + if (address == NULL) +-- +1.7.10.1 + diff --git a/mingw-glib2.spec b/mingw-glib2.spec index 8c93e2a..ee2b5fb 100644 --- a/mingw-glib2.spec +++ b/mingw-glib2.spec @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: mingw-glib2 Version: 2.32.2 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: MinGW Windows GLib2 library License: LGPLv2+ @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ BuildRequires: gettext # Native version required for glib-genmarshal BuildRequires: glib2-devel >= 2.31.20 +# https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675516 +Patch0: 0001-Don-t-start-a-DBus-server-when-built-as-static-lib.patch + + %description MinGW Windows Glib2 library. @@ -74,6 +78,7 @@ Static version of the MinGW Windows GLib2 library. %prep %setup -q -n glib-%{version} +%patch0 -p1 %build @@ -252,6 +257,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.la" -delete %changelog +* Sat May 05 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.32.2-2 +- Fix compile failure while building static library (GNOME BZ #675516) + * Tue May 01 2012 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> - 2.32.2-1 - Update to 2.32.2 - Dropped upstreamed patches

1 0

Version Discrepancy Report
by Michael Cronenworth 05 May '12

05 May '12

Hi all, I have revised the formatting of the version matching script. The report is split between arches. 32-bit is at the top and 64-bit is at the bottom. MinGW 32-bit packages version discrepancies ------------------------------------------- +-------------------------------+ | f17 | rawhide | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | SDL | 1.2.14 | 1.2.15 | | mingw32-SDL | 1.2.13 | 1.2.13 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | SDL_mixer | 1.2.12 | 1.2.12 | | mingw32-SDL_mixer | 1.2.11 | 1.2.11 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | cairo | | 1.12.0 | | mingw32-cairo | | 1.10.2 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | expat | 2.1.0 | 2.1.0 | | mingw32-expat | 2.0.1 | 2.0.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | fontconfig | | 2.9.0 | | mingw32-fontconfig | | 2.8.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | freeglut | 2.8.0 | 2.8.0 | | mingw32-freeglut | 2.6.0 | 2.6.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | freetype | | 2.4.9 | | mingw32-freetype | | 2.4.8 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gdbm | 1.10 | 1.10 | | mingw32-gdbm | 1.8.0 | 1.8.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gnutls | | 2.12.18 | | mingw32-gnutls | | 2.12.17 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gtkhtml3 | 4.4.1 | 4.5.1 | | mingw32-gtkhtml3 | 4.4.0 | 4.4.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libffi | 3.0.10 | 3.0.10 | | mingw32-libffi | 3.0.11 | 3.0.11 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libgeotiff | 1.2.5 | 1.2.5 | | mingw32-libgeotiff | 1.3.0 | 1.3.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libidn | 1.24 | 1.24 | | mingw32-libidn | 1.14 | 1.14 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libjpeg-turbo | 1.2.0 | 1.2.0 | | mingw32-libjpeg-turbo | 1.1.1 | 1.1.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libogg | 1.2.2 | 1.2.2 | | mingw32-libogg | 1.3.0 | 1.3.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libpng | 1.5.10 | 1.5.10 | | mingw32-libpng | 1.5.7 | 1.5.7 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libsigsegv | 2.10 | 2.10 | | mingw32-libsigsegv | 2.6 | 2.6 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libssh2 | 1.4.1 | 1.4.1 | | mingw32-libssh2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libvorbis | 1.3.3 | 1.3.3 | | mingw32-libvorbis | 1.3.2 | 1.3.2 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libzip | 0.10.1 | 0.10.1 | | mingw32-libzip | 0.9 | 0.9 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | pixman | | 0.25.2 | | mingw32-pixman | | 0.24.4 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | proj | 4.7.0 | 4.8.0 | | mingw32-proj | 4.6.1 | 4.6.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | qwt | 5.2.2 | 5.2.2 | | mingw32-qwt | 5.2.1 | 5.2.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | readline | 6.2 | 6.2 | | mingw32-readline | 5.2 | 5.2 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | sqlite | 3.7.11 | 3.7.11 | | mingw32-sqlite | 3.7.9 | 3.7.9 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | tk | 8.5.11 | 8.5.11 | | mingw32-tk | 8.5.9 | 8.5.9 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ MinGW 64-bit packages version discrepancies ------------------------------------------- +-------------------------------+ | f17 | rawhide | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | SDL | 1.2.14 | 1.2.15 | | mingw64-SDL | 1.2.13 | 1.2.13 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | SDL_mixer | 1.2.12 | 1.2.12 | | mingw64-SDL_mixer | 1.2.11 | 1.2.11 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | binutils | 2.22.52.0.1 | 2.22.52.0.2 | | mingw64-binutils | 2.22.52 | 2.22.52 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | cairo | | 1.12.0 | | mingw64-cairo | | 1.10.2 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | dbus | 1.4.10 | 1.4.20 | | mingw64-dbus | 1.4.16 | 1.4.16 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | expat | 2.1.0 | 2.1.0 | | mingw64-expat | 2.0.1 | 2.0.1 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | fontconfig | | 2.9.0 | | mingw64-fontconfig | | 2.8.0 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | freetype | | 2.4.9 | | mingw64-freetype | | 2.4.8 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gdb | 7.4.50.20120120 | 7.4.50.20120120 | | mingw64-gdb | 7.4 | 7.4 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gnutls | | 2.12.18 | | mingw64-gnutls | | 2.12.17 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gtkhtml3 | 4.4.1 | 4.5.1 | | mingw64-gtkhtml3 | 4.4.0 | 4.4.0 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | icu | | 49.1.1 | | mingw64-icu | | 4.8.1.1 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libffi | 3.0.10 | 3.0.10 | | mingw64-libffi | 3.0.11 | 3.0.11 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libidn | 1.24 | 1.24 | | mingw64-libidn | 1.14 | 1.14 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libjpeg-turbo | 1.2.0 | 1.2.0 | | mingw64-libjpeg-turbo | 1.1.1 | 1.1.1 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libjpeg-turbo-static | 1.2.0 | 1.2.0 | | mingw64-libjpeg-turbo-static | 1.1.1 | 1.1.1 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libogg | 1.2.2 | 1.2.2 | | mingw64-libogg | 1.3.0 | 1.3.0 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libpng | 1.5.10 | 1.5.10 | | mingw64-libpng | 1.5.7 | 1.5.7 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libpng-static | 1.5.10 | 1.5.10 | | mingw64-libpng-static | 1.5.7 | 1.5.7 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libssh2 | 1.4.1 | 1.4.1 | | mingw64-libssh2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libvorbis | 1.3.3 | 1.3.3 | | mingw64-libvorbis | 1.3.2 | 1.3.2 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | openssl | 1.0.0i | 1.0.1b | | mingw64-openssl | 1.0.0d | 1.0.0d | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | openssl-static | 1.0.0i | 1.0.1b | | mingw64-openssl-static | 1.0.0d | 1.0.0d | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | pixman | | 0.25.2 | | mingw64-pixman | | 0.24.4 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | readline | 6.2 | 6.2 | | mingw64-readline | 5.2 | 5.2 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | readline-static | 6.2 | 6.2 | | mingw64-readline-static | 5.2 | 5.2 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+ | sqlite | 3.7.11 | 3.7.11 | | mingw64-sqlite | 3.7.9 | 3.7.9 | +------------------------------+---------------+---------------+

2 2

[Bug 818769] Review Request: mingw-orc - Cross compiled Oil Run-time Compiler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '12

05 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818769 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '12

05 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 --- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> 2012-05-04 23:31:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Created attachment 581982 [details] > patch needed to fix librfb linking New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.2… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 665539] New: mingw32-bzip2 is missing a static package
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '12

05 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-bzip2 is missing a static package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665539 Summary: mingw32-bzip2 is missing a static package Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-bzip2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: amorilia(a)users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Currently, it is not possible to cross compile against bzip2 statically. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.5-8 How reproducible: cat > test.c <<EOF void main() {}; EOF i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -Wl,-Bstatic -lbz2 test.c Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: /usr/lib64/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.5.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ld: cannot find -lbz2 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Expected results: The test program compiles successfully. Additional info: Patch attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 812573] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins good
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '12

05 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812573 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-04 18:55:00 EDT --- mingw-bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc17, mingw-boost-1.48.0-8.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 811909] New: Linking against mingw32 libbzip2 fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '12

05 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Linking against mingw32 libbzip2 fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811909 Summary: Linking against mingw32 libbzip2 fails Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: mingw32-bzip2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: yeti(a)physics.muni.cz QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, amorilia(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: Linking against the MinGW port of bzip2 fails. For start, code generated by standard configure tests such as AC_CHECK_LIB(bz2, BZ2_bzopen, ...) fails. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-9.fc15 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create the following C code (essentially what configure creates as conftest.c), calling it conftest.c: char BZ2_bzopen (); int main () { return BZ2_bzopen (); return 0; } 2. Run i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -o conftest.exe -g -O2 conftestc.c -lbz2 Actual results: /home/yeti/tmp/ccEfyAbq.o: In function `main': /home/yeti/xxx/conftest.c:5: undefined reference to `_BZ2_bzopen' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Expected results: It links and creates conftest.exe. Additional info: According to i686-pc-mingw32-nm, symbols in libbz2.dll.a bear extensions such as @8, @10, etc., so BZ2_bzopen is there as _BZ2_bzopen@8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 May '12

04 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 --- Comment #5 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-03 19:06:45 EDT --- Created attachment 581982 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=581982 patch needed to fix librfb linking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 May '12

04 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |818769 --- Comment #4 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-03 18:25:40 EDT --- I filed 818769 with an updated package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 May '12

03 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575 --- Comment #3 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> 2012-05-03 17:01:31 EDT --- you should comment out BuildRequires mingw{32,64}-orc or submit that package first -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 813064] MinGW Qt application doesn't linked with openssl at runtime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 May '12

03 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813064 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-03 03:24:56 EDT --- Package mingw32-qt-4.8.1-1.fc16, mingw32-qt-qmake-4.8.1-1.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing mingw32-qt-4.8.1-1.fc16 mingw32-qt-qmake-4.8.1-1.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7133/mingw32-qt-4.8.1-1… then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 818256] Review Request: mingw-spice-gtk - client libraries for SPICE desktop servers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 May '12

03 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818256 Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 812573] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins good
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 May '12

02 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812573 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-02 16:31:02 EDT --- Package mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-5.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-5.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7057/mingw-gstreamer-pl… then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Fedora 17 version matching report
by Michael Cronenworth 02 May '12

02 May '12

Hi all, I have created a script to find and report version discrepancies between native Fedora and MinGW package versions (behind or ahead). In my opinion, as this is not a formal rule, we should try to match the package versions on each distribution version as best we can. I am still playing the formatting so bear with me. ------------------------------------------- MinGW 32-bit packages version discrepancies ------------------------------------------- SDL 1.2.14 mingw32-SDL 1.2.13 SDL_mixer 1.2.12 mingw32-SDL_mixer 1.2.11 expat 2.1.0 mingw32-expat 2.0.1 freeglut 2.8.0 mingw32-freeglut 2.6.0 gdbm 1.10 mingw32-gdbm 1.8.0 gtkhtml3 4.4.1 mingw32-gtkhtml3 4.4.0 libffi 3.0.10 mingw32-libffi 3.0.11 libgeotiff 1.2.5 mingw32-libgeotiff 1.3.0 libidn 1.24 mingw32-libidn 1.14 libjpeg-turbo 1.2.0 mingw32-libjpeg-turbo 1.1.1 libogg 1.2.2 mingw32-libogg 1.3.0 libpng 1.5.10 mingw32-libpng 1.5.7 libsigsegv 2.10 mingw32-libsigsegv 2.6 libssh2 1.4.1 mingw32-libssh2 1.1 libvorbis 1.3.3 mingw32-libvorbis 1.3.2 libzip 0.10.1 mingw32-libzip 0.9 openssl 1.0.0i mingw32-openssl 1.0.0d pcre 8.21 mingw32-pcre 8.30 proj 4.7.0 mingw32-proj 4.6.1 qwt 5.2.2 mingw32-qwt 5.2.1 readline 6.2 mingw32-readline 5.2 sqlite 3.7.11 mingw32-sqlite 3.7.9 tk 8.5.11 mingw32-tk 8.5.9 ------------------------------------------- MinGW 64-bit packages version discrepancies ------------------------------------------- SDL 1.2.14 mingw64-SDL 1.2.13 SDL_mixer 1.2.12 mingw64-SDL_mixer 1.2.11 expat 2.1.0 mingw64-expat 2.0.1 gtkhtml3 4.4.1 mingw64-gtkhtml3 4.4.0 libffi 3.0.10 mingw64-libffi 3.0.11 libidn 1.24 mingw64-libidn 1.14 libjpeg-turbo 1.2.0 mingw64-libjpeg-turbo 1.1.1 libogg 1.2.2 mingw64-libogg 1.3.0 libpng 1.5.10 mingw64-libpng 1.5.7 libssh2 1.4.1 mingw64-libssh2 1.1 libvorbis 1.3.3 mingw64-libvorbis 1.3.2 openssl 1.0.0i mingw64-openssl 1.0.0d pcre 8.21 mingw64-pcre 8.30 readline 6.2 mingw64-readline 5.2 sqlite 3.7.11 mingw64-sqlite 3.7.9

1 0

[Bug 814512] mingw64-pdcurses missing?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 May '12

02 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814512 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mingw-pdcurses-3.4-12.fc17 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-02 00:55:17 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-02 00:55:17 EDT --- mingw-pdcurses-3.4-12.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[mingw-glib2] Update to 2.32.2
by Kalev Lember 01 May '12

01 May '12

commit 06a68dd524f8ffe1a2e78d5d9884aeaac47e8339 Author: Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue May 1 15:00:44 2012 +0300 Update to 2.32.2 ... and dropped upstreamed patches. 0001-tests-fileutils-Fix-Windows-build.patch | 26 ------------------- 0002-Only-build-gmenumodel-test-on-unix.patch | 33 ------------------------- mingw-glib2.spec | 14 ++++------- sources | 2 +- 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/mingw-glib2.spec b/mingw-glib2.spec index 1922314..8c93e2a 100644 --- a/mingw-glib2.spec +++ b/mingw-glib2.spec @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ %?mingw_package_header Name: mingw-glib2 -Version: 2.32.1 +Version: 2.32.2 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: MinGW Windows GLib2 library @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ URL: http://www.gtk.org # first two digits of version %define release_version %(echo %{version} | awk -F. '{print $1"."$2}') Source0: http://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/%{release_version}/glib-%{version}.t… -Patch0: 0001-tests-fileutils-Fix-Windows-build.patch -Patch1: 0002-Only-build-gmenumodel-test-on-unix.patch BuildArch: noarch @@ -37,9 +35,6 @@ BuildRequires: gettext # Native version required for glib-genmarshal BuildRequires: glib2-devel >= 2.31.20 -# Needed for the patch -BuildRequires: autoconf automake libtool - %description MinGW Windows Glib2 library. @@ -79,9 +74,6 @@ Static version of the MinGW Windows GLib2 library. %prep %setup -q -n glib-%{version} -%patch0 -p1 -b .ETXTBSY -%patch1 -p1 -b .gmenumodel -autoreconf -i --force %build @@ -260,6 +252,10 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.la" -delete %changelog +* Tue May 01 2012 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> - 2.32.2-1 +- Update to 2.32.2 +- Dropped upstreamed patches + * Sat Apr 14 2012 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> - 2.32.1-1 - Update to 2.32.1 - Dropped an upstreamed patch diff --git a/sources b/sources index 417e466..7f05da0 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -032c7cf9868c9aa186b490b155a41144 glib-2.32.1.tar.xz +5bfdb6197afb90e4dbc7b1bb98f0eae0 glib-2.32.2.tar.xz

1 0

[Bug 813064] MinGW Qt application doesn't linked with openssl at runtime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '12

01 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813064 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-01 13:19:30 EDT --- mingw32-qt-4.8.1-1.fc16,mingw32-qt-qmake-4.8.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-qt-4.8.1-1.fc16,mingw32-qt-… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 813064] MinGW Qt application doesn't linked with openssl at runtime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '12

01 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813064 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-05-01 13:07:44 EDT --- mingw32-qt-4.7.4-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-qt-4.7.4-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 813064] MinGW Qt application doesn't linked with openssl at runtime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '12

01 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813064 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 813064] MinGW Qt application doesn't linked with openssl at runtime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '12

01 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813064 --- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2012-05-01 11:03:47 EDT --- Great! I'll push updated packages to Fedora 15 and 16 (in Fedora 17 and rawhide this issue was already resolved) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 813064] MinGW Qt application doesn't linked with openssl at runtime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '12

01 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813064 --- Comment #12 from Ivan Romanov <drizt(a)land.ru> 2012-05-01 11:01:30 EDT --- Nice! It works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

File glib-2.32.2.tar.xz uploaded to lookaside cache by kalev
by Kalev Lember 01 May '12

01 May '12

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mingw-glib2: 5bfdb6197afb90e4dbc7b1bb98f0eae0 glib-2.32.2.tar.xz

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw May 2012