https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756776
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> ---
Okay, let's go:
- The BuildRoot tag is not needed any more with modern RPM, so it can be
removed
- The Requires: pkgconfig is currently mentioned in the global section (the
mingw-libosinfo). However, as no mingw-libosinfo binary rpm is generated, this
Requires flag doesn't have any effect. You might want to move it to the
%package sections for the mingw32-libosinfo and mingw64-libosinfo packages
- The quotes which you used in the %mingw_make_install
"DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" aren't needed any more and can be removed
- The %defattr tags in the %files sections is also unneeded with modern RPM
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657478
Summary: Invalid declare statement in macros.mingw32 with some
packages
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: mingw32-filesystem
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: waananen(a)nbi.dk
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee,
erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl,
fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, drizt(a)land.ru
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I'm using a custom build of mingw32-python in order to build Python bindings
for a software package. For this packages the code in macros.mingw32 breaks:
...
for i in `ls %{_mingw32_bindir}/*|grep -- "-config\$"` ; do \
x=`basename $i|tr "a-z+-" "A-ZX_"`; \
declare -x $x="$i" ; export $x; \
done; \
...
The variable name $x contains a ('.') when it finds the python2.x-config script
in %{_mingw32_bindir}. One could imagine that this problem could be triggered
on other *-config scripts.
The fix is easy: filter away dots ('.') from the filename when generating the
variable name (eg. |cut -d '.').
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
I found this in Fedora 12, but it seems applicable to Fedora 14.
How reproducible:
Build a package which requires mingw32-python. The mingw32-python does
not yet exist in Fedora (unfortunately).
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Package build fails
Expected results:
Package should build
Additional info:
Cheers
Anders
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754437
Daniel Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|mingw32-libvirt-glib - |mingw-libvirt-glib -
|libvirt glib integration |libvirt glib integration
|for event |for event
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756776
Daniel Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|mingw32-libosinfo - MinGW |mingw-libosinfo - MinGW
|Windows libvirt |Windows libvirt
|virtualization library |virtualization library
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724906
Tomas Hoger <thoger(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends On| |833934
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833622
Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr
| |oject.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr
| |oject.org
Depends On|83 |833622
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Hi there,
wine as of version 1.5.5 has support for a custom build of mono[1]
similar to mingw-wine-gecko[2].
Since wine 1.5.6 wine tries to install wine-mono from a local
filesystem, or if it is not found it suggests to download it from
winehq.
I have prepared a package[3] so we can offer a distribution build of
wine-mono to our users to avoid downloads from 3rd party sites (aside
from other advantages as the files is needed per user). There currently
is an issue with winemsibuilder[4] which prevents me from putting the
package up for review just yet. However, I want to push wine 1.5.6 (or
possibly 1.5.7) to fedora asap. Because of this I would like to ask for
your help in getting the new package into shape so the formal review can
be done quickly after the issue is resolved.
Thanks in advance,
Andreas
[1] - http://wiki.winehq.org/Mono
[2] - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw-wine-gecko
[3] - http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/
[4] - http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30952
--
Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de>