June 2012 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 799398] New: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799398 Summary: SDL_Init not found in libSDL.dll.a Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: mingw32-SDL AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: salsaman(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: Compilation is broken Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: Create a dll which is statically linked with SDL, as follows: bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -fPIC -DPIC -DIS_MINGW=1 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -Dmain=SDL_main -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/SDL -g -O2 -Wall -shared -fPIC -DPIC -module -avoid-version --tag=disable-static -no-undefined -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDLmain.a -o SDL.la -rpath "/usr/lib/lives/plugins/playback/video" SDL_la-SDL.lo libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -shared .libs/SDL_la-SDL.o -O2 -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDL.dll.a -Wl,/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libSDLmain.a -o .libs/SDL.dll -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base -Xlinker --out-implib -Xlinker .libs/SDL.dll.a This creates SDL.dll in .libs. No warnings are given about missing functions. Actual results: When SDL.dll is loaded and run under wine, it crashes with: wine: Call from 0x7bc4c100 to unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init, aborting wine: Unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init called at address 0x7bc4c100 (thread 0023), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: unimplemented function SDL.dll.SDL_Init called in 32-bit code (0x7bc4c100). Expected results: SDL_Init should be found inside libSDL.dll.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 2 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 795699] New: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all]

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795699 Summary: CVE-2012-0841 libxml2: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: mingw32-libxml2 AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: huzaifas(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, veillard(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, drizt(a)land.ru Blocks: 787067 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=787067 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 2 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 806271] New: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all]

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806271 Summary: CVE-2012-1144 freetype: insufficient checking of first outline point in TTF parser (#35689) [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Component: mingw32-freetype AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: thoger(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 800607 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=800607 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 3 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 835686] Review Request: wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: wine-mono - |mingw-wine-mono - Mono |Mono library required for |library required for Wine |Wine --- Comment #7 from Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de> --- http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-mono.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-mono-0.0.4-6.fc17.src.rpm * Fri Jun 29 2012 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> - 0.0.4-6 - rename to wine-mono -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 832007] Review Request: mingw-webkitgtk3 - MinGW Windows GTK+ Web content engine library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mingw-webkitgtk3-1.8.1-1.fc | |17 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2012-06-29 02:54:21 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> --- Package imported and built; closing the ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 832007] Review Request: mingw-webkitgtk3 - MinGW Windows GTK+ Web content engine library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 832007] Review Request: mingw-webkitgtk3 - MinGW Windows GTK+ Web content engine library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks for the review, Paweł! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-webkitgtk3 Short Description: MinGW Windows GTK+ Web content engine library Owners: kalev pfor Branches: f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 832007] Review Request: mingw-webkitgtk3 - MinGW Windows GTK+ Web content engine library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007 Paweł Forysiuk <tuxator(a)o2.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |tuxator(a)o2.pl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 832007] Review Request: mingw-webkitgtk3 - MinGW Windows GTK+ Web content engine library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832007 Paweł Forysiuk <tuxator(a)o2.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuxator(a)o2.pl Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Paweł Forysiuk <tuxator(a)o2.pl> --- Fedora review of mingw-webkitgtk3-1.8.1-1.fc17.src.rpm 2012-06-28 [+] rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces rpmlint mingw-webkitgtk3.spec mingw-webkitgtk3-1.8.1-1.fc17.src.rpm mingw32-webkitgtk3-debuginfo-1.8.1-1.fc17.noarch.rpm mingw32-webkitgtk3-1.8.1-1.fc17.noarch.rpm mingw64-webkitgtk3-debuginfo-1.8.1-1.fc17.noarch.rpm mingw64-webkitgtk3-1.8.1-1.fc17.noarch.rpm mingw-webkitgtk3.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US mingw32-webkitgtk3-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-webkitgtk3-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Warnings from rpmlint output are a false positive. [+] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines (For MinGW packages). [+] The spec file name match the base package %{name} [+] Package is licensed with Fedora approved license. [+] License filed in package matches actual license. [+] Other included licenses are packaged in %doc [+] Spec file is written in American English [+] Spec file is legible [+] Source used to build matches the upstream source sha1sum webkit-1.8.1.tar.xz ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/webkit-1.8.1.tar.xz d26543baace03c31aa3de82bc24f06f14c6b3052 webkit-1.8.1.tar.xz d26543baace03c31aa3de82bc24f06f14c6b3052 /home/pawel/rpmbuild/SOURCES/webkit-1.8.1.tar.xz [+] Package compiles and builds successfully [+] Locales are handled properly [+] Package does not bundle system libraries [+] Package owns all directories it creates [+] Permissions are properly set [+] All filenames are valid UTF-8 Package works very nice when used with cross-compiled Midori browser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 835686] Review Request: mingw-wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- I was just about to propose the exact same thing about the package naming :) I'm +1 to use the package name wine-mono given the situation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw June 2012