https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rc040203(a)freenet.de
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> ---
Package fails to build in mock:
...
m4 ../asm.m4 machine.m4 config.m4 \
aes-decrypt-internal.asm >aes-decrypt-internal.s
/bin/sh: m4: command not found
make[1]: *** [aes-decrypt-internal.o] Error 127
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/nettle-2.4/build_win32'
make: *** [all] Error 2
make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/nettle-2.4/build_win32'
Seems to me, as if m4 isn't part of the tools being installed in mock by
default anymore ;)
=> BR: m4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833622
--- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > * What is reason to run the autotools while building?
> > gmp is supposed to build fine for mingw without it (and it actually does).
>
> I was following the native package spec. I have removed this.
Thanks.
> > * What is the reason to ship and use gmp.h and gmp-mparam.h?
>
> See comment 10 or the comment I left in the spec. I followed the native
> package in shipping these wrappers. I will copy it again here:
> # Some apps seem to assume that they are building against the
> # gmp source tree and require the source versions of the gmp.h
> # and gmp-mparam.h files.
Well,
* the gmp.h-wrapper (gmp.h) is a (RH/Fedora-specific) cludge to work-around the
original gmp.h not being multilib-capable. I.e. this wrapper is not required on
single-arched/lib'ed systems, such as mingw.
* The gmp-mparam.h-wrapper is a similar cludge/hack aiming at gmp-mparam.h not
being multlib-capable, with similar considerations applying to it.
The delicacy behind this: gmp does not export the gmp-mparam.h header.
=> No gmp package should ship it. Packages expecting it should be considered
broken (I guess, this is what is meant by "some apps seem to .. gmp
source-tree" in the comment above.)
In other words, both wrappers are not necessary for mingw, shipping the gmp.h
wrapper makes some (limited) sense, but shipping gmp-mparam.h doesn't.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833622
--- Comment #12 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> * What is reason to run the autotools while building?
> gmp is supposed to build fine for mingw without it (and it actually does).
I was following the native package spec. I have removed this.
New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gmp.spec
New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gmp-5.0.2-3.fc17.src.rpm
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4436277
>
> * What is the reason to ship and use gmp.h and gmp-mparam.h?
See comment 10 or the comment I left in the spec. I followed the native package
in shipping these wrappers. I will copy it again here:
# Some apps seem to assume that they are building against the
# gmp source tree and require the source versions of the gmp.h
# and gmp-mparam.h files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833622
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rc040203(a)freenet.de
--- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> ---
2 questions:
* What is reason to run the autotools while building?
gmp is supposed to build fine for mingw without it (and it actually does).
* What is the reason to ship and use gmp.h and gmp-mparam.h?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851848
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Package mingw-glib2-2.33.10-2.fc18, mingw-gtk3-3.5.12-1.fc18,
mingw-pango-1.31.0-1.fc18, mingw-atk-2.5.4-1.fc18, mingw-harfbuzz-0.9.3-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing mingw-glib2-2.33.10-2.fc18
mingw-gtk3-3.5.12-1.fc18 mingw-pango-1.31.0-1.fc18 mingw-atk-2.5.4-1.fc18
mingw-harfbuzz-0.9.3-1.fc18'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12863/mingw-glib2-2.33.…
then log in and leave karma (feedback).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Summary of changes:
d7b4489... Applied patch to make g_unlink more reliable on Win32 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent