mingw May 2013

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
181 discussions

[Bug 961405] Review Request: mingw-openjpeg - MinGW Windows OpenJPEG library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '13

25 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961405 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-openjpeg-1.5.1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-openjpeg-1.5.1-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LDmrWhNcI7&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 961405] Review Request: mingw-openjpeg - MinGW Windows OpenJPEG library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '13

25 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961405 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=22eEIOCuwy&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '13

25 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5423958 $ rpmlint mingw-glew.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw-glew-1.9.0-4.fc20.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-glew-1.9.0-4.fc19.noarch.rpm mingw32-glew-static-1.9.0-4.fc19.noarch.rpm mingw32-glew-tools-1.9.0-4.fc19.noarch.rpm mingw64-glew-1.9.0-4.fc19.noarch.rpm mingw64-glew-static-1.9.0-4.fc19.noarch.rpm mingw64-glew-tools-1.9.0-4.fc19.noarch.rpm mingw32-glew-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-glew-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-glew-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-glew-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpm --query --requires mingw32-glew rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw32-crt mingw32-filesystem >= 83 mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(opengl32.dll) mingw32-pkg-config rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --requires mingw64-glew rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw64-crt mingw64-filesystem >= 83 mingw64(kernel32.dll) mingw64(msvcrt.dll) mingw64(opengl32.dll) mingw64-pkg-config rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --requires mingw32-glew-static mingw32-glew = 1.9.0-4.fc19 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --requires mingw64-glew-static mingw64-glew = 1.9.0-4.fc19 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --requires mingw32-glew-tools mingw32-glew = 1.9.0-4.fc19 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw32-crt mingw32-filesystem >= 83 mingw32(gdi32.dll) mingw32(glew32.dll) mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(opengl32.dll) mingw32(user32.dll) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --requires mingw64-glew-tools mingw64-glew = 1.9.0-4.fc19 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw64-crt mingw64-filesystem >= 83 mingw64(gdi32.dll) mingw64(glew32.dll) mingw64(kernel32.dll) mingw64(msvcrt.dll) mingw64(opengl32.dll) mingw64(user32.dll) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --provides mingw32-glew mingw32-glew = 1.9.0-4.fc19 mingw32(glew32.dll) mingw32(glew32mx.dll) $ rpm --query --provides mingw64-glew mingw64-glew = 1.9.0-4.fc19 mingw64(glew32.dll) mingw64(glew32mx.dll) $ rpm --query --provides mingw32-glew-static mingw32-glew-static = 1.9.0-4.fc19 $ rpm --query --provides mingw64-glew-static mingw64-glew-static = 1.9.0-4.fc19 $ rpm --query --provides mingw32-glew-tools mingw32-glew-tools = 1.9.0-4.fc19 $ rpm --query --provides mingw64-glew-tools mingw64-glew-tools = 1.9.0-4.fc19 $ wget --quiet http://downloads.sourceforge.net/glew/glew-1.9.0.tgz -O - | md5sum 69ce911decef6249d24742497e6ad06a - $ md5sum glew-1.9.0.tgz 69ce911decef6249d24742497e6ad06a glew-1.9.0.tgz + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable [+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines [+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-' [+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header} [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages [+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch [+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section [!] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4 to configure the package [!] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package [!] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package [+] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used [+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated [+] Libtool .la files are not bundled [+] .def files are not bundled [+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal [!] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal The mingw32 package seems to depend on libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll while the mingw64 package doesn't. I've also seen this on various other packages so we can ignore this for now This package doesn't use any of the configure and make-related mingw macros. Normally this is a blocker, but given the fact that upstream of this package uses hand-written Makefiles (instead of a generic build system like autotools) I'm okay with the way the package is built in the current .spec file. ================================================ The package mingw-glew is APPROVED by epienbro ================================================ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hEptxxYxhj&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 May '13

24 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797 --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> --- Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/mingw-glew.spec SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/mingw-glew-1.9.0-4.fc20.src.rpm Uh, sorry about that - fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nkBnep0g2G&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 May '13

24 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jrXbWkIiFP&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 May '13

24 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797 --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- Your latest srpm gives me a 404 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hW4CEtvKb0&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 May '13

24 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797 --- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks Erik. So, we're good to go I'd say? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2JRLZcIYiF&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 916797] Review Request: mingw-glew - MinGW OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 May '13

23 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797 --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- The FPC has just approved our updated packaging guidelines and have also made an addition to it: Executables which are required for proper functionality of the libraries must be packaged in the matching mingw32/mingw64 subpackage. All other executables are discouraged, but may be packaged in optional (dependent) subpackages at a packager's discretion. This situation applies to this package. The executables which are part of this package are not required for proper functionality of the library so therefore the recommended approach is to place them in subpackages. You've already done this with your -tools subpackages so this package complies with the mingw packaging guidelines now -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AfP1f2kUts&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

Proposal: Updated Fedora MinGW Packaging Guidelines
by Erik van Pienbroek 23 May '13

23 May '13

Hi all, Over the last couple of months I received some feedback about the current Fedora MinGW Packaging Guidelines. Some topics were missing and other weren't verbose enough. Therefore I just created a draft with updated packaging guidelines in which all the feedback was incorporated. Before letting the Fedora Packaging Committee (FPC) make a final decision about this draft I want to let the Fedora MinGW users review it first. The draft packaging guidelines can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGWCrossCompiler The diff against the current MinGW packaging guidelines can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=PackagingDrafts% 2FMinGWCrossCompiler&diff=337954&oldid=302743 The following changes are done in the updated packaging guidelines: 1. Removed all references to %mingw_make_install as it shouldn't be used any more 2. Removed the Group tag as it isn't needed any more according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Group_tag 3. Added macros for Qt4 and Qt5 (%mingw{,32,64}-qmake-qt{4,5}) 4. Added a column to various tables to indicate in which version of mingw-filesystem the macro in question was added 5. Make it more clear that packages don't need to BuildRequires: mingw-filesystem (as mentioned in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895566) 6. Added a section explaining what to do with executables 7. Replaced the section about man/info pages with a more generic section about files which shouldn't be bundled when they are already part of native packages 7a. autoconf macro files shouldn't be bundled in mingw packages any more If you think something is still missing, the text is too difficult to read (English is not my native language) or you don't agree with any of the proposed changes please let me know so it can be fixed before handing everything over to the FPC. Please also let me know if you're +1 to the proposed changes. Feedback can be sent until tomorrow evening. The next FPC meeting is this Thursday so let's hope we can still get everything ready in time. Regards, Erik van Pienbroek

2 3

[Bug 961403] Review Request: mingw-gtkspell3 - MinGW Windows GtkSpell3 library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '13

22 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961403 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-gtkspell3-3.0.2-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2qKX9o4t66&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
19
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw May 2013