Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961407
Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC| |t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed| |2013-05-09 17:49:29
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> ---
If you want to take over mingw-poppler, fine with me, but I suggest continuing
the old review so we have the history in one place...
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 851292 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PB4nflJIGR&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797
--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> ---
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/mingw-glew.spec
SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/mingw-glew-1.9.0-3.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu May 09 2013 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> - 1.9.0-3
- Remove mingw_build_win32/64 macros
- Properly version mingw32-filesystem BuildRequires
- Reword win32/64_dynamic_dir to win32/64_shared_dir
pkgname: I used in order to make the spec file more generic (i.e. simplify
copy-pasting)
tools subpackage: Are there any guidelines there (i.e. should the tools
subpackage never be created, or just for a large number of executables?) Just
so that I can adjust all my other specs accordingly. Personally, I find it
elegant to keep them separated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YQUo8k3ZmY&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797
--- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> ---
Some additional comments:
- The executables don't have to be placed in a separate -tools package. They
can be placed in the main package
- Please try to prevent the use of wildcards in the filelist and only use them
when a folder contains lots of files (in order to keep the filelist legible)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wL2G8fAkbr&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916797
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> ---
Taking for review
- The '%global mingw_build_win32/64' isn't needed any more and can be removed
- The pkgname variable also isn't needed any more (although you can leave it
'as is' if you like it better this way)
- The 'BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem' is unversioned while it should be '>=
95'
- In various places you've used the terms 'dynamic' and 'static'. I think it
would be more clear to other users if you use 'shared' and 'static' as these
terms are more common
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WSnkLHG69K&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851683
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed|2012-09-08 00:55:36 |2013-05-09 11:20:41
--- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> ---
Package was successfully imported and built in f18, f19 and rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=15833
=> Closing ticket
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iUKR3QpNhm&a=cc_unsubscribe