mingw April 2014

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
97 discussions

[Bug 1085352] Review Request: mingw-opusfile - A high-level API for decoding and seeking within .opus files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Apr '14

24 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085352 --- Comment #5 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> --- One minor issue I see: %{mingw{32,64}_includedir}/opus is an unowned directory. Can you fix this before you commit? You can change %{mingw32_includedir}/opus/opus* to %{mingw32_includedir}/opus. It looks like the native package makes the same mistake. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MHvA2lLWV5&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1085352] Review Request: mingw-opusfile - A high-level API for decoding and seeking within .opus files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Apr '14

24 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085352 David King <amigadave(a)amigadave.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from David King <amigadave(a)amigadave.com> --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-opusfile Short Description: A high-level API for decoding and seeking within .opus files Owners: amigadave Branches: f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qj7180Y850&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1085352] Review Request: mingw-opusfile - A high-level API for decoding and seeking within .opus files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Apr '14

24 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085352 --- Comment #3 from David King <amigadave(a)amigadave.com> --- Thanks for the review Jerry! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ofuDpiwMEL&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1085352] Review Request: mingw-opusfile - A high-level API for decoding and seeking within .opus files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Apr '14

24 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085352 Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> --- If I am reading the mingw packaging guidelines correctly, then there are no issues with this package. In particular, all of the rpmlint warnings are expected and normal for a mingw package. The package is APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 6 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: mingw32-opusfile-0.5-1.fc21.noarch.rpm mingw64-opusfile-0.5-1.fc21.noarch.rpm mingw-opusfile-0.5-1.fc21.src.rpm mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libopusfile -> filibuster mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multichannel -> multiplicand mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US muxed -> mixed, mused, maxed mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downmixing -> down mixing, down-mixing, downsizing mingw32-opusfile.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusfile.dll.a mingw32-opusfile.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusurl.dll.a mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusfile.dll.a mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusfile.dll.a mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/opusurl.pc mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/opus/opusfile.h mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/opusfile.pc mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusurl.dll.a mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusurl.dll.a mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-w64-mingw32 mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libopusfile -> filibuster mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multichannel -> multiplicand mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US muxed -> mixed, mused, maxed mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downmixing -> down mixing, down-mixing, downsizing mingw64-opusfile.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusurl.dll.a mingw64-opusfile.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusfile.dll.a mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/opusurl.pc mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusurl.dll.a mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusurl.dll.a mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/opusfile.pc mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/opus/opusfile.h mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusfile.dll.a mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libopusfile.dll.a mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr x86_64-w64-mingw32 mingw-opusfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libopusfile -> filibuster mingw-opusfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multichannel -> multiplicand mingw-opusfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US muxed -> mixed, mused, maxed mingw-opusfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downmixing -> down mixing, down-mixing, downsizing 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 28 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint mingw32-opusfile mingw64-opusfile mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libopusfile -> filibuster mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multichannel -> multiplicand mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US muxed -> mixed, mused, maxed mingw32-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downmixing -> down mixing, down-mixing, downsizing mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libopusfile -> filibuster mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multichannel -> multiplicand mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US muxed -> mixed, mused, maxed mingw64-opusfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downmixing -> down mixing, down-mixing, downsizing 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- mingw32-opusfile (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): mingw32(crypt32.dll) mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libcrypto-10.dll) mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll) mingw32(libogg-0.dll) mingw32(libopus-0.dll) mingw32(libopusfile-0.dll) mingw32(libssl-10.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(ws2_32.dll) mingw32-crt mingw32-filesystem mingw32-pkg-config mingw64-opusfile (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): mingw64(crypt32.dll) mingw64(kernel32.dll) mingw64(libcrypto-10.dll) mingw64(libogg-0.dll) mingw64(libopus-0.dll) mingw64(libopusfile-0.dll) mingw64(libssl-10.dll) mingw64(msvcrt.dll) mingw64(ws2_32.dll) mingw64-crt mingw64-filesystem mingw64-pkg-config Provides -------- mingw32-opusfile: mingw32(libopusfile-0.dll) mingw32(libopusurl-0.dll) mingw32-opusfile mingw64-opusfile: mingw64(libopusfile-0.dll) mingw64(libopusurl-0.dll) mingw64-opusfile Source checksums ---------------- http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/opus/opusfile-0.5.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 2ce52d006aeeec9f10260dbe3073c4636954a1ab19c82b8baafefe0180aa4a39 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2ce52d006aeeec9f10260dbe3073c4636954a1ab19c82b8baafefe0180aa4a39 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1085352 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eZaNJHe8bQ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1085352] Review Request: mingw-opusfile - A high-level API for decoding and seeking within .opus files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Apr '14

24 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085352 Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |loganjerry(a)gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> --- I will take this review. Sorry to take so long, David. I've never done a mingw review before, so I had to read up on the packaging guidelines. I'll have the review ready shortly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4EdmPwvRGl&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1031734] CVE-2013-6629 libjpeg: information leak (read of uninitialized memory)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Apr '14

22 Apr '14

1 0

[Bug 1045561] CVE-2013-6954 libpng: unhandled zero-length PLTE chunk or NULL palette
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Apr '14

22 Apr '14

1 0

[Bug 1086674] New: CVE-2013-7353 mingw32-libpng: libpng: integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in png_set_unknown_chunks() [epel-6]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Apr '14

21 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086674 Bug ID: 1086674 Summary: CVE-2013-7353 mingw32-libpng: libpng: integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in png_set_unknown_chunks() [epel-6] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: mingw32-libpng Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: rjones(a)redhat.com Reporter: huzaifas(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: drizt(a)land.ru, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktietz(a)redhat.com, lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1086514 (CVE-2013-7353) This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of Fedora EPEL. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the Bodhi notes field when available. epel-6 tracking bug for mingw32-libpng: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s). [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086514 [Bug 1086514] CVE-2013-7353 libpng: integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in png_set_unknown_chunks() -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NMm3UNhBqh&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 1086672] New: CVE-2013-7353 mingw32-libpng: libpng: integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in png_set_unknown_chunks() [epel-5]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Apr '14

21 Apr '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086672 Bug ID: 1086672 Summary: CVE-2013-7353 mingw32-libpng: libpng: integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in png_set_unknown_chunks() [epel-5] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Component: mingw32-libpng Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: rjones(a)redhat.com Reporter: huzaifas(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: drizt(a)land.ru, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktietz(a)redhat.com, lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1086514 (CVE-2013-7353) This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of Fedora EPEL. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the Bodhi notes field when available. epel-5 tracking bug for mingw32-libpng: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s). [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086514 [Bug 1086514] CVE-2013-7353 libpng: integer overflow leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in png_set_unknown_chunks() -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6KlN9Qp94F&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 20 Apr '14

20 Apr '14

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw April 2014