mingw May 2022

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
3 discussions

Planning to start unifying native and mingw packages
by Sandro Mani 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

Hi Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm planning to start merging native and mingw packages. Initially, I'll be looking at these packages where I maintain both variants: eigen3 mingw-eigen3 enchant2 mingw-enchant2 freeimage mingw-freeimage gdal mingw-gdal GeographicLib mingw-GeographicLib geos mingw-geos giflib mingw-giflib gtkspell3 mingw-gtkspell3 gtkspellmm30 mingw-gtkspellmm30 jxrlib mingw-jxrlib leptonica mingw-leptonica libgeotiff mingw-libgeotiff libimagequant mingw-libimagequant libkml mingw-libkml librttopo mingw-librttopo libspatialite mingw-libspatialite libwebp mingw-libwebp openjpeg2 mingw-openjpeg2 OpenSceneGraph mingw-OpenSceneGraph osgearth mingw-osgearth podofo mingw-podofo proj mingw-proj python-pillow mingw-python-pillow qtspell mingw-qtspell shapelib mingw-shapelib svg2svgt mingw-svg2svgt tesseract mingw-tesseract uriparser mingw-uriparser I'm performing test builds here [1]. Once I've got them all building there, if there are no objections, I plan to push to F37 and retire all the corresponding mingw repos. Sandro [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/mingw-unified-spec/builds/

3 6

Standard DLL provides
by Sandro Mani 04 May '22

04 May '22

Hi Currently mingw-filesystem contains # (rpm -ql mingw32-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do i686-w64-mingw32-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-mingw32 Source20: standard-dlls-mingw32 # (rpm -ql mingw64-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do x86_64-w64-mingw32-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-mingw64 Source21: standard-dlls-mingw64 # (rpm -ql ucrt64-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do x86_64-w64-mingw32ucrt-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-ucrt64 Source22: standard-dlls-ucrt64 and %package -n mingw32-filesystem [...] Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/mingw32(\1) /g" %{SOURCE20} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: mingw32(mscoree.dll) %package -n mingw64-filesystem [...] Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/mingw64(\1) /g" %{SOURCE21} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: mingw64(mscoree.dll) %package -n ucrt64-filesystem [...] Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/ucrt64(\1) /g" %{SOURCE22} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: ucrt64(mscoree.dll) I wonder whether these standard DLL provides should be provided by mingw32-crt, mingw64 and ucrt64-crt instead? The provided DLLs depend on the mingw-w64 version (indeed I just had to update them for mingw-w64-10.0.0), and IMO it would be better to keep mingw-filesystem independent from the mingw-w64 version, i.e. to allow adding macros etc and allow simple git merges to update also the other branches. I'd proceed with removing these from mingw-filesystem, and adding to mingw-crt.spec: # Steps: # - Perform (scratch) build with bootstrap=1 # - Update the standard-dlls-xxx files as documented below, and rebuild with bootstrap=0 %global bootstrap 0 %if 0%{?bootstrap:1} # (rpm -ql mingw32-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do i686-w64-mingw32-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-mingw32 Source1: standard-dlls-mingw32 # (rpm -ql mingw64-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do x86_64-w64-mingw32-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-mingw64 Source2: standard-dlls-mingw64 # (rpm -ql ucrt64-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do x86_64-w64-mingw32ucrt-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-ucrt64 Source3: standard-dlls-ucrt64 %endif %package -n mingw32-crt [...] %if 0%{?bootstrap:1} Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/mingw32(\1) /g" %{SOURCE1} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: mingw32(mscoree.dll) %endif %package -n mingw64-crt [...] %if 0%{?bootstrap:1} Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/mingw64(\1) /g" %{SOURCE2} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: mingw64(mscoree.dll) %endif %package -n ucrt64-crt [...] %if 0%{?bootstrap:1} Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/ucrt64(\1) /g" %{SOURCE3} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: ucrt64(mscoree.dll) %endif Any comments/objections? Thanks Sandro

3 4

Fwd: Standard DLL provides
by Sandro Mani 03 May '22

03 May '22

On 03.05.22 17:16, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 04:46:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: >>>> Any comments/objections? >>>> >>>> >>>> That seems to make sense to me, is there a reason why it wasn't before? >>>> >> As far as I see mingw-filesystem provided the standard DLLs since >> the beginning of the package, perhaps @rjones can recall if there >> was a reason? > The reason for having the standard provides at all, or the reason they > are in mingw-filesystem? The reason for having them at all is just > for uniformity. You can "BuildRequires: mingw(wsock32.dll)" and not > care whether that comes from Windows/Wine or from Fedora. > > The reason they are in mingw-filesystem and not in mingw-crt is likely > just because we put them there without thinking about it too much. > (Or "filesystem" is the system environment). > > Anyway moving them seem sensible, I have no objections. Ok thanks, I'll proceed then. Sandro

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw May 2022