On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 04:46:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>Any comments/objections?
>>
>>
>>That seems to make sense to me, is there a reason why it wasn't before?
>>
As far as I see mingw-filesystem provided the standard DLLs since
the beginning of the package, perhaps @rjones can recall if there
was a reason?
The reason for having the standard provides at all, or the reason they
are in mingw-filesystem? The reason for having them at all is just
for uniformity. You can "BuildRequires: mingw(wsock32.dll)" and not
care whether that comes from Windows/Wine or from Fedora.
The reason they are in mingw-filesystem and not in mingw-crt is likely
just because we put them there without thinking about it too much.
(Or "filesystem" is the system environment).
Anyway moving them seem sensible, I have no objections.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html