Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-filesystem AssignedTo: rjones@redhat.com ReportedBy: waananen@nbi.dk QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: berrange@redhat.com, rjones@redhat.com, erik-fedora@vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Even if the specfile includes:
%define __strip %{_mingw32_strip}
mingw32 cross-compiled packages does not get their DLL's or binaries stripped.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Checked with:
mingw32-filesystem-56-1
How reproducible:
Very easy to reproduce by building a mingw32 package. Also official Fedora mingw32 packages are not stripped either - I tested the package: mingw32-pixman-0.14.0-1.fc11.
Steps to Reproduce: 1. cp -p /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp 2. i686-pc-mingw32-strip /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll
Actual results:
# ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 1252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll
Expected results:
# ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fedora@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fedora@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-03-09 11:52:27 EST --- Hi,
Stripping debug symbols and collecting them in -debuginfo subpackages was introduced in Fedora 12. I noticed that you're still using the Fedora 11 mingw packages, so chances are that your problem is already solved in Fedora 12. Could you please try again with the Fedora 12 packages ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se 2010-03-09 13:36:03 EST --- None of the packages I build on Fedora 12 gets stripped, even though I follow the guidelines on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW
Looking at the mingw32 packages in Fedora 12 some are stripped and some are not. Looking at the specfiles of some of the packages that are stripped reveals that they contain:
%define __debug_install_post %{_mingw32_debug_install_post}
and later
%{?_mingw32_debug_package}
Which seems to be the undocumented additions needed to get it to work.
Neither of these are mentioned in the guidelines, and searching for them in the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ gives no hits.
As the guidelines are written, they say that if you follow the guidelines you get stripped binaries:
Libraries and executables should be stripped. This is done correctly and automatically if the spec file includes these lines:
%global __strip %{_mingw32_strip} %global __objdump %{_mingw32_objdump}
Which doesn't happen. To get stripped binaries you need to add two lines to your specfile that are neither mentioned in the guidelines nor anywhere else.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|mingw32 produced DLL's are |mingw32 information on |not stripped |generating debuginfo in the | |guidelines is incorrect, | |and they need to be updated
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2010-03-09 14:05:02 EST --- The currently approved packaging guidelines have a number of problems. We have been collecting the list of problems here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues
so that when we come to update and seek approval for the guidelines again, we know what needs to change. It sounds like this issue (and the whole issue of generating debuginfo) needs to be added to the above page.
Updated the summary line to reflect this.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fedora@vanpienbroek.nl 2010-03-09 14:07:38 EST --- You're right that the usage of the debuginfo macro's isn't documented in the guidelines. The topic (debuginfo support) has been discussed on the fedora-mingw mailing list though. This can be read at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2009-June/001613.html (+ follow ups) and http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2009-July/001811.html (+ follow ups).
Unfortunately the Fedora MinGW SIG has had a lack of leadership and interest these days. One year ago I spent a lot of time on the Fedora MinGW SIG to get new packages and features in, but a few months ago I started on a new full-time job leaving me with very little spare time to work on the Fedora MinGW SIG.
The %global __strip override is only used for static libraries, so that's why you're not seeing any effects when used on libraries or executables.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
John Poelstra poelstra@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2010-11-03 16:22:12 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|12 |rawhide
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2010-11-04 07:04:06 EDT --- Still a problem in rawhide.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686
Kalev Lember kalev@smartlink.ee changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |kalev@smartlink.ee Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|needinfo?(waananen@nbi.dk) | Last Closed| |2011-05-18 15:18:33
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember kalev@smartlink.ee 2011-05-18 15:18:33 EDT --- The FPC amended the MinGW guidelines today, including the changes for generating the -debuginfo subpackages. https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/83
Closing the ticket.
-
Red Hat Bugzilla