On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:12:51PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:31:46PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:42:56PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> hi,
>>>> what was the reason to not add -fstack-protector to mingw's cflags?
>>>> i didn't see the reason.
>>> It didn't work -- at least in the version of GCC that I tried it with
>>> originally. IIRC compiled OK, but there was a missing symbol when
>>> linking. Maybe it does work now. I haven't tested it recently.
>>>
>>> BTW, we are all away until Jan 2nd ~ 5th, so don't expect much to
>>> happen before next week.
>> what's not compile? gcc or any given package?
>
> It does in fact appear to work now. Does this mean that our C flags
> are identical to the standard Fedora C flags?
almost. i'd like to be as little different as possible. so the only
difference in this case would be the mms...
would you change flags in the filesystem macro?
I forgot about the bitfields flag. However it seems we can do this ...
%define _mingw32_cflags %{__global_cflags} -mms-bitfields
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v