https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306047 --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Apologies for the scarse info: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation faul 0x7c919af2 in ntdll!RtlpWaitForCriticalSection () #0 0x7c919af2 in ntdll!RtlpWaitForCriticalSection () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll #1 0x7c901046 in ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll #2 0x008ae4dc in ?? () #3 0x68837025 in g_private_get_impl ( key=key@entry=0x688497d4 <private_thread_memory>) at ../../glib/gthread-win32.c:342 #4 0x68837b32 in g_private_get_impl (key=0x688497d4 <private_thread_memory>) at ../../glib/gthread-win32.c:340 #5 g_private_get (key=key@entry=0x688497d4 <private_thread_memory>) at ../../glib/gthread-win32.c:386 #6 0x6880edb3 in thread_memory_from_self () at ../../glib/gslice.c:507 #7 g_slice_alloc (mem_size=mem_size@entry=56) at ../../glib/gslice.c:1003 #8 0x687e2c45 in g_hash_table_new_full ( hash_func=hash_func@entry=0x687e3c90 <g_str_hash>, key_equal_func=key_equal_func@entry=0x687e3c60 <g_str_equal>, key_destroy_func=key_destroy_func@entry=0x0, value_destroy_func=value_destroy_func@entry=0x0) at ../../glib/ghash.c:711 #9 0x687e2cf7 in g_hash_table_new (hash_func=0x687e3c90 <g_str_hash>, key_equal_func=0x687e3c60 <g_str_equal>) at ../../glib/ghash.c:674 #10 0x68801fd4 in g_quark_init () at ../../glib/gquark.c:61 #11 0x68847f75 in glib_init () at ../../glib/glib-init.c:243 #12 glib_init_ctor () at ../../glib/glib-init.c:258 #13 0x688424fc in __do_global_ctors () -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306047 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment|0 |1 #1122556 is| | obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Created attachment 1122599 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1122599&action=edit Patch (Oh boy, after a day looking at linking errors and segfaults and got sloppy resp. overexcited when things worked, while I should just have gone to bed. Turns out I screwed things up myself. Sorry for the false alarm.) Proper patch attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306047 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #4) It looks you were already half asleep when you uploaded the updated patch. The new patch is one for the mingw-pango package instead of the mingw-glib2 package :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306047 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; --- If I understand the patch correctly there are 3 different changes here: - The glib-prefer-constructors-over-DllMain patch is improved so it also covers a similar issue in the gobject library - A BR: mingw{32,64}-pcre is added so that the external PCRE library is used instead of the bundled one - A BR: mingw{32,64}-winpthreads is added It appears that the DllMain in gobject was added just recently: https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/gobject/gtype.c?id=7a29771a743a8... and appears to have been done to fix a compatibility issue with MSVC2015/Windows 10 SDK: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752837 For mingw I think the updated patch is correct although it may not work correctly anymore for MSVC.. The change about pcre looks good enough to more, external libraries should be used where possible The last one shouldn't be necessary. winpthreads should already automatically get pulled in by mingw{32,64}-gcc In your updated patch the posix threading configure argument seem to have gotten lost. Was this intentional? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306047 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment|0 |1 #1122789 is| | obsolete| | --- Comment #10 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Created attachment 1156926 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1156926&action=edit Patch Patch rebased. Would be nice if this could get merged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306047 --- Comment #11 from Kalev Lember <klember(a)redhat.com&gt; --- Can you send this upstream to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=glib , please? And maybe ask nacho to review it on IRC afterwards? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.