hi, mingw32-binutils branches still not merged. please merge EL-5 and other braches to the same source. thanks.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, mingw32-binutils branches still not merged. please merge EL-5 and other braches to the same source.
Sorry, I don't understand what this means.
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, mingw32-binutils branches still not merged. please merge EL-5 and other braches to the same source.
Sorry, I don't understand what this means.
as i ci to the fedora cvs 2 weeks ago the EL-5 and other branches are different. it'd be useful to merge them. we discuss it and sent a patch too but you probably forget about it.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:44:14PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, mingw32-binutils branches still not merged. please merge EL-5 and other braches to the same source.
Sorry, I don't understand what this means.
as i ci to the fedora cvs 2 weeks ago the EL-5 and other branches are different. it'd be useful to merge them. we discuss it and sent a patch too but you probably forget about it.
OK, the EL-5 branch was wrong. It must runtime-Require mingw32-filesystem. This dependency is only added automatically when we are using the mingw32-find-requires.sh script, which we don't use in these low-level packages.
Anyway, I've synched the three branches again.
Rich.
-
Farkas Levente -
Richard W.M. Jones