2:43 p.m.
To test a possible bug I needed to have 2.12.6.1 built. Using the
mingw32-2.10.5 spec file I found the following differences:
- libnettle has been chosen as the default crypto lib, but I gave
configure "--with-libgcrypt"
to use gcrypt.
- openssl compat dll has an soname bump from 26 to 27
The .def file is still named 26, though. I will report upstream.
- libgnutlsxx has an soname bump from 26 to 27
- p11tool, a new binary
Just an FYI as I see 2.12 is in rawhide.
3:37 p.m.
On 06/13/2011 10:43 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
To test a possible bug I needed to have 2.12.6.1 built. Using the
mingw32-2.10.5 spec file I found the following differences:
- libnettle has been chosen as the default crypto lib, but I gave
configure "--with-libgcrypt"
to use gcrypt.
Looks like the Fedora native gnutls package also uses libgcrypt.
- openssl compat dll has an soname bump from 26 to 27
The .def file is still named 26, though. I will report upstream.
Yes, reporting it upstream would be nice, although all the .def files
should just be removed from the binary rpm. I believe libtool creates
them as a by-product and they aren't actually needed by anything else
once the .dll and .dll.a files have been created.
- libgnutlsxx has an soname bump from 26 to 27
- p11tool, a new binary
Just an FYI as I see 2.12 is in rawhide.
Excellent work. If you would like to update the rawhide mingw32-gnutls
package, I think you should post the diff here and also apply for commit
ACLs in pkgdb.
Thanks for doing this.
--
Kalev
2:58 p.m.
Kalev Lember on 06/13/2011 03:37 PM wrote:
Yes, reporting it upstream would be nice, although all the .def
files
should just be removed from the binary rpm. I believe libtool creates
them as a by-product and they aren't actually needed by anything else
once the .dll and .dll.a files have been created.
Upstream got back to me and it is expected to have the different name in
the .def.
Excellent work. If you would like to update the rawhide
mingw32-gnutls
package, I think you should post the diff here and also apply for commit
ACLs in pkgdb.
I'll get around to it when I can.
6:07 a.m.
Michael Cronenworth schreef op vr 21-10-2011 om 10:14 [-0500]:
Kalev Lember on 06/13/2011 03:37 PM wrote:
> Excellent work. If you would like to update the rawhide mingw32-gnutls
> package, I think you should post the diff here and also apply for commit
> ACLs in pkgdb.
I just requested commit access. (Better late than never)
Hi Michael,
I just approved your ACL request for mingw32-gnutls rawhide.
If you want to apply any non-trivial changes please publish your diff
for review first. Doing this on our IRC channel is even better. Kalev,
Richard and I are hanging out there all the time. That way we can also
forward-port the changes directly to the mingw-w64 testing repo.
Kind regards,
Erik
10:58 a.m.
On 10/22/2011 06:07 AM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
I just approved your ACL request for mingw32-gnutls rawhide.
If you want to apply any non-trivial changes please publish your diff
for review first. Doing this on our IRC channel is even better. Kalev,
Richard and I are hanging out there all the time. That way we can also
forward-port the changes directly to the mingw-w64 testing repo.
Will do. Thanks.
4563
days inactive
4694
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Erik van Pienbroek -
Kalev Lember -
Michael Cronenworth