https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043745
Bug ID: 1043745 Summary: CVE-2013-6425 mingw32-pixman: pixman: integer underflow when handling trapezoids [epel-5] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Component: mingw32-pixman Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: rjones@redhat.com Reporter: huzaifas@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org, kraxel@redhat.com, lfarkas@lfarkas.org, rjones@redhat.com Blocks: 1037975 (CVE-2013-6425)
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the Bodhi notes field when available.
epel-5 tracking bug for mingw32-pixman: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s).
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037975 [Bug 1037975] CVE-2013-6425 pixman: integer underflow when handling trapezoids
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043745
--- Comment #1 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzaifas@redhat.com ---
Please use the following update submission link to create the Bodhi request for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated bugs get updated when new packages are pushed to stable.
Please also ensure that the "Close bugs when update is stable" option remains checked.
Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=1037975...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043745
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|rjones@redhat.com |erik-fedora@vanpienbroek.nl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043745
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- The EPEL 5 package is ancient history (mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.el5).
Shall we just obsolete it?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043745
--- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzaifas@redhat.com --- (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #2)
The EPEL 5 package is ancient history (mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.el5).
Shall we just obsolete it?
yes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043745
Jason Taylor jason.taylor@secure-24.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason.taylor@secure-24.com Whiteboard| |fst_owner=jtaylor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043745
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fedora@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2014-09-01 09:27:37
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fedora@vanpienbroek.nl --- All mingw32 packages have been removed from EPEL-5 as per https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5977