Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|mingw-libglademm24 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; 2009-03-25 06:10:53 EDT --- Please note that we have mingw32-gtkmm24 and mingw32-libglade2 packaged already here: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/... http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/... Please submit them as separate Review Requests for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; 2009-04-18 12:34:50 EDT --- Building the package fails: ../../scripts/depcomp: line 571: exec: i686-pc-mingw32-g++: not found make[2]: *** [generate_defs_libglade.o] Error 127 I suspect this is due to a missing BuildRequires on mingw32-gcc-c++. Also, configure complains about the --enable-docs flag: configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --enable-docs ./configure --help does not list this flag for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; 2009-04-19 13:22:31 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-4.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-19 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (COPYING) * The spec file is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream f9ca5b67f6c551ea98790ab5f21c19d0 libglademm-2.6.7.tar.bz2 f9ca5b67f6c551ea98790ab5f21c19d0 SRPM/libglademm-2.6.7.tar.bz2 * According to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ! The package contains documentation already present in the native Fedora package * BuildRequires look sane ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; 2009-04-20 03:17:00 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com&gt; 2009-04-21 15:52:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2009-05-21 19:29:16 EDT --- mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.