morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653 Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply] Description of problem: Downloading Packages: http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...: [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 10 x86_64 How reproducible: Everytime since last few days Steps to Reproduce: 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10. 2. 3. Actual results: yum uses mirror site to update for all packages Expected results: yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We do not expect it to be down for too long. Additional info: My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux

morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653 Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply] Description of problem: Downloading Packages: http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...: [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 10 x86_64 How reproducible: Everytime since last few days Steps to Reproduce: 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10. 2. 3. Actual results: yum uses mirror site to update for all packages Expected results: yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We do not expect it to be down for too long. Additional info: My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux

[rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms 6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms

8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -----Original Message----- From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com] Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM To: Chris Morrow Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68 inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB) Memory:fc000000-fc020000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which? On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote: > morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653 > > Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply] > > Description of problem: > > Downloading Packages: > http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...: > [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')> > > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > Fedora 10 x86_64 > > How reproducible: > Everytime since last few days > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10. > 2. > 3. > > Actual results: > yum uses mirror site to update for all packages > > Expected results: > yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We > do not expect it to be down for too long. > > Additional info: > My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo > laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far. > > > > -- > Matt Domsch > Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO > linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux > > > >

[root@rramamoo rramamoo]# tcptraceroute fedora.secsup.org Selected device eth0, address 10.17.14.64, port 42624 for outgoing packets Tracing the path to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops max 1 10.17.14.254 0.704 ms 0.287 ms 0.652 ms 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 1.237 ms 1.215 ms 1.052 ms 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 1.338 ms 1.446 ms 1.296 ms 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 1.315 ms 1.443 ms 1.454 ms 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 62.352 ms 20.014 ms 20.224 ms 6 500.ATM4-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.137) 20.511 ms 22.391 ms 19.830 ms 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.590 ms 30.110 ms 20.724 ms 8 * * * 9 208.209.50.21 [open] 20.334 ms 20.514 ms 22.031 ms

----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 9:47:35 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: RE: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote: > [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org > traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > 1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms > 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms > 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms > 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms > 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms > 6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms > 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here. on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host): [morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/... --2009-05-08 14:46:38-- http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/... Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111, ... Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain] Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' 100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in 0.9s 2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) - `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670] so... 'works for me!' ?? > 8 * * * > 9 * * * > 10 * * * > 11 * * * > 12 * * * > 13 * * * > 14 * * * > > -- > Matt Domsch > Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO > linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com] > Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM > To: Chris Morrow > Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt > Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report > > It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network). > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; > Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68 > inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB) > Memory:fc000000-fc020000 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; > To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; > Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report > > which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which? > > On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote: > >> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat. >> >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653 >> >> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply] >> >> Description of problem: >> >> Downloading Packages: >> http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...: >> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')> >> >> >> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): >> Fedora 10 x86_64 >> >> How reproducible: >> Everytime since last few days >> >> Steps to Reproduce: >> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10. >> 2. >> 3. >> >> Actual results: >> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages >> >> Expected results: >> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We >> do not expect it to be down for too long. >> >> Additional info: >> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo >> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far. >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Domsch >> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO >> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux >> >> >> >> >

On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote: > Yes. wget worked. ok, so.. was it NOT wget that you used previously? (oh, yum...) what does yum use in the background and can you test yum as well?

> [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ wget http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/... > --2009-05-08 10:31:43-- http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/... > Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1112, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, ... > Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain] > Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' > > 100%[=============================================================================================================>] 321,670 1.62M/s in 0.2s > > 2009-05-08 10:31:44 (1.62 MB/s) - `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; > To: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 10:29:40 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report > > > > On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote: > >> [root@rramamoo rramamoo]# tcptraceroute fedora.secsup.org >> Selected device eth0, address 10.17.14.64, port 42624 for outgoing packets >> Tracing the path to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops max >> 1 10.17.14.254 0.704 ms 0.287 ms 0.652 ms >> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 1.237 ms 1.215 ms 1.052 ms >> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 1.338 ms 1.446 ms 1.296 ms >> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 1.315 ms 1.443 ms 1.454 ms >> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 62.352 ms 20.014 ms 20.224 ms >> 6 500.ATM4-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.137) 20.511 ms 22.391 ms 19.830 ms >> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.590 ms 30.110 ms 20.724 ms >> 8 * * * >> 9 208.209.50.21 [open] 20.334 ms 20.514 ms 22.031 ms > > great, does wget work for you? I can test from a bunch of other places, > but I suspect it's going to work for me from everywhere I look... > > pls try your download again. > > -Chris > >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; >> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; >> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 9:47:35 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central >> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report >> >> >> >> On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote: >> >>> [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org >>> traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets >>> 1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms >>> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms >>> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms >>> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms >>> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms >>> 6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms >>> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms >> >> that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding >> end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here. >> >> on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host): >> >> [morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget >> http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/... >> --2009-05-08 14:46:38-- >> http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/... >> Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21, >> 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111, >> ... >> Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected. >> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK >> Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain] >> Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' >> >> 100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in >> 0.9s >> >> 2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) - >> `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670] >> >> >> so... 'works for me!' ?? >> >>> 8 * * * >>> 9 * * * >>> 10 * * * >>> 11 * * * >>> 12 * * * >>> 13 * * * >>> 14 * * * >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Domsch >>> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO >>> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com] >>> Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM >>> To: Chris Morrow >>> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt >>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report >>> >>> It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network). >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; >>> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; >>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central >>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report >>> >>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68 >>> inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 >>> inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link >>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >>> RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >>> TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 >>> RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB) >>> Memory:fc000000-fc020000 >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net&gt; >>> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com&gt; >>> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org >>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central >>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report >>> >>> which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which? >>> >>> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote: >>> >>>> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653 >>>> >>>> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply] >>>> >>>> Description of problem: >>>> >>>> Downloading Packages: >>>> http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...: >>>> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')> >>>> >>>> >>>> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): >>>> Fedora 10 x86_64 >>>> >>>> How reproducible: >>>> Everytime since last few days >>>> >>>> Steps to Reproduce: >>>> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10. >>>> 2. >>>> 3. >>>> >>>> Actual results: >>>> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages >>>> >>>> Expected results: >>>> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We >>>> do not expect it to be down for too long. >>>> >>>> Additional info: >>>> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo >>>> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.