Looks like the spin was dropped due to no one paying attention when the builds were failing. It also needs to be built and tested by the SIG before Feature freeze (which is prior to Alpha release).

As the spin does not really add anything that can't be obtained via the comps package, uses a desktop manager that is not really lightweight and I'm not really sure is worth the effort. The original hope was that we would attract more people to the spin to help maintain packages (and the spin itself) etc but this hasn't worked.

If it is decided to resubmit for fedora 24, I'd suggest requiring more people who have access to the spins kickstart repo so they can edit the files when builds fail, when packages change etc. As far as I'm aware that is only me at this stage.

On 11/09/15 02:08, Brian Monroe wrote:

I'm in favor. But maybe we should consider other options? Do we know why we were dropped in the first place?

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, 4:00 AM Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote:

Further to the dumping of fedora jam from nightlies and test builds it
looks like we wont be in F23 (despite being on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/Spins) and will have to
re-submit the spin for approval for F24 (not clear how to do that as
many of the things in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process are
already done). Is it worth doing? I don't mind doing testing on
composes and images, but don't want to just go ahead and re-submit the
spin without asking here first.

--
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music