9:40 p.m.
Hi,
This is a bit of emergency and yet its late. However, I'm not giving up
without finding out why ./waf can't locate ntk after i have installed it
(both by compilation and from fedora repo ... as non-ntk)
Has anyone successfully compiled non-daw on fedora and why is it not in
the repos?
Regards
Onyeibo
4:04 p.m.
On 11/03/2013 03:40 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
Hi,
This is a bit of emergency and yet its late. However, I'm not giving up
without finding out why ./waf can't locate ntk after i have installed it
(both by compilation and from fedora repo ... as non-ntk)
Has anyone successfully compiled non-daw on fedora and why is it not in
the repos?
Regards
Onyeibo
_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
Sorry - only just got this. Was in my spam folder.
non-* applications are in Fedora, but only just made it to f18 updates
testing last week. Submitted for stable now.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/non-daw
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=14998
regards,
Brendan
8:02 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi:
Maybe this is obvious, but you have to install both "non-ntk" and
"non-ntk-
devel" to compile new Non packages.
I tried compiling Non-Mixer a while ago, and I had the same problem: waf
couldn't locate ntk either way.
Brendan, is there a technical reason we only have Non packages for two of the
applications? Maybe it's my time to step in.
Christopher
On 3 November 2013 23:04:02 Brendan Jones wrote:
On 11/03/2013 03:40 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a bit of emergency and yet its late. However, I'm not giving up
> without finding out why ./waf can't locate ntk after i have installed it
> (both by compilation and from fedora repo ... as non-ntk)
>
> Has anyone successfully compiled non-daw on fedora and why is it not in
> the repos?
>
> Regards
> Onyeibo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> music mailing list
> music(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
Sorry - only just got this. Was in my spam folder.
non-* applications are in Fedora, but only just made it to f18 updates
testing last week. Submitted for stable now.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/non-daw
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=14998
regards,
Brendan
_______________________________________________
music mailing list
music(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)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=8qQh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
11:14 p.m.
On 11/04/2013 03:02 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi:
Maybe this is obvious, but you have to install both "non-ntk" and
"non-ntk-
devel" to compile new Non packages.
I tried compiling Non-Mixer a while ago, and I had the same problem: waf
couldn't locate ntk either way.
Brendan, is there a technical reason we only have Non packages for two of the
applications? Maybe it's my time to step in.
Christopher
We have all of them. (session-manager,mixer,daw,sequencer) They all get
built from the one non-daw source package.
non-ntk is also used to build lv2-fabla, lv2-artyfx-plugins and lv2-sorcer.
regards,
Brendan
11:56 p.m.
On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 21:02 -0500, Christopher Antila wrote:
Hi:
Maybe this is obvious, but you have to install both "non-ntk" and
"non-ntk-
devel" to compile new Non packages.
I tried compiling Non-Mixer a while ago, and I had the same problem: waf
couldn't locate ntk either way.
Brendan, is there a technical reason we only have Non packages for two of the
applications? Maybe it's my time to step in.
Finally compiled all non applications by setting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH and
LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables. I found only "non-ntk" on
Fedora-20 repos (that's what I'm running). I couldn't get the
applications working in time to use them yesterday but I think they look
promising. It even imports an Ardour session (not sure whether that
applies to A3).
So, it still baffles me why Ardour-3 (A3) and non-* are not readily
available in Fedora-20. I was told to search Planet-CCRMA for A3, I
only found binaries for fedora-17/18 or so.
Regards
Onyeibo
12:09 a.m.
On 11/04/2013 06:56 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 21:02 -0500, Christopher Antila wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Maybe this is obvious, but you have to install both "non-ntk" and
"non-ntk-
> devel" to compile new Non packages.
>
> I tried compiling Non-Mixer a while ago, and I had the same problem: waf
> couldn't locate ntk either way.
>
> Brendan, is there a technical reason we only have Non packages for two of the
> applications? Maybe it's my time to step in.
>
Finally compiled all non applications by setting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH and
LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables. I found only "non-ntk" on
Fedora-20 repos (that's what I'm running). I couldn't get the
applications working in time to use them yesterday but I think they look
promising. It even imports an Ardour session (not sure whether that
applies to A3).
So, it still baffles me why Ardour-3 (A3) and non-* are not readily
available in Fedora-20. I was told to search Planet-CCRMA for A3, I
only found binaries for fedora-17/18 or so.
Ardour 3 was approved this weekend so should be appearing soon and the
non-* packages have been available for f20 for quite some time (Sept 03
- they are even on the spin!).
Brendan
10:10 p.m.
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 07:09 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
>
Ardour 3 was approved this weekend so should be appearing soon and the
non-* packages have been available for f20 for quite some time (Sept 03
- they are even on the spin!).
Brendan
Awesome!
I just saw a posting to test ardour3 though I still can't find it in the
repos. I now have the non-* packages. Neat work
Regards
Onyeibo
12:34 a.m.
On 11/05/2013 05:10 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 07:09 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
>>
> Ardour 3 was approved this weekend so should be appearing soon and the
> non-* packages have been available for f20 for quite some time (Sept 03
> - they are even on the spin!).
>
> Brendan
Awesome!
I just saw a posting to test ardour3 though I still can't find it in the
repos. I now have the non-* packages. Neat work
Patience grasshopper ;) F20 updates-testing push is still pending.
If you can't wait follow the builds link to grap the RPM (you will need
libltc as well):
F-20:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20094/ardour3-3.5.14-...
1:23 a.m.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Brendan Jones wrote:
If you can't wait follow the builds link to grap the RPM (you
will need
libltc as well):
F-20:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20094/ardour3-3.5.14-...
Normal users probably still use F19 or even F18 (F20 Beta isn't even out yet):
F-18:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20148/ardour3-3.5.14-...
F-19:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20198/ardour3-3.5.14-...
--
MT
3818
days inactive
3820
days old
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Brendan Jones -
Christopher Antila -
Martin Tarenskeen -
Onyeibo Oku