omit inbox tag on sent folder
by R. Andrew Bailey
I've been using mutt-kz for several months and absolutely love it. I
suspect this is a dumb question, so apologies in advance.
I use 'set record="+sent"', and I find that my sent mail is
automatically indexed (good), but that it gets tagged as +inbox. I
considered adding sent to the new.ignore option in notmuch-config, but
I definitely like having it indexed.
I'm thinking I can ignore sent and then use a post send hook to index
my sentmail folder without adding +inbox, but I'm guessing there may
be some simpler way to do this. Any advice appreciated.
.andy
10 years, 11 months
[PATCH] notmuch: hide signed and encrypted tags by default
by David Sterba
Mutt shows signed/encrypted status in another way and occupies only 1
char in index line. Hide the tags by default and leave more space for
other tags.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.cz>
---
init.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/init.h b/init.h
index 478ea5b..2edb02a 100644
--- a/init.h
+++ b/init.h
@@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ struct option_t MuttVars[] = {
** notmuch://<absolute path>.
*/
- { "nm_hidden_tags", DT_STR, R_NONE, UL &NotmuchHiddenTags, UL "unread,draft,flagged,passed,replied,attachment" },
+ { "nm_hidden_tags", DT_STR, R_NONE, UL &NotmuchHiddenTags, UL "unread,draft,flagged,passed,replied,attachment,signed,encrypted" },
/*
** .pp
** This variable specifies private notmuch tags which should not be printed
--
1.8.0.2
10 years, 11 months
state of the fork
by Douglas Campos
Howdy!
After getting frustrated with mutt's development pace, I've ended here.
Tons of questions:
- What's the state of the fork?
- Is there any plans of doing a release?
- What about cleaning all the hg stuff from the repo since we've moved
to git (volunteering myself)
- What to do with all those open pull requests?
- Any reason for not renaming the target executable to mutt-kz?
Thanks!
--
qmx
10 years, 11 months
[PATCH] Add strndup implementation for systems with lack of it
by Vladimir Marek
From: Vladimir Marek <vlmarek(a)volny.cz>
Solaris 10 FCS (first release) does not have strndup implementation.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Marek <vlmarek(a)volny.cz>
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
strndup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 strndup.c
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index a92e81c..5d20cd9 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ AC_CHECK_TYPE(ssize_t, int)
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fgetpos memmove setegid srand48 strerror)
-AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([setenv strcasecmp strdup strsep strtok_r wcscasecmp])
+AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([setenv strcasecmp strdup strsep strtok_r wcscasecmp strndup])
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([strcasestr mkdtemp])
AC_CHECK_FUNC(getopt)
diff --git a/strndup.c b/strndup.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..81557ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/strndup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* Solaris 10 FCS does not have strndup */
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+char *
+strndup(const char *s, size_t n)
+{
+ size_t len;
+ char *ret;
+
+ if (!s)
+ return (char *)NULL;
+
+ len = strlen(s);
+ if (n < len)
+ len = n;
+
+ ret = malloc(len + 1); /* To store '\0' */
+ memcpy(ret, s, len);
+ ret[len] = '\0';
+ return ret;
+}
--
1.7.9.2
10 years, 11 months
Re: state of the fork
by Suvayu Ali
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
> After getting frustrated with mutt's development pace, I've ended here.
Actually recently it started being quite active. Some details below.
> Tons of questions:
> - What's the state of the fork?
It is moderately active (my impression as a user)
> - Is there any plans of doing a release?
> - What about cleaning all the hg stuff from the repo since we've moved
> to git (volunteering myself)
I think the hg stuff is around to facilitate easy merging with latest
mutt developments. mutt-kz was synced with latest mutt developments
few months ago.
As you can see here: <http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/>, mutt has been
quite active lately.
> - What to do with all those open pull requests?
> - Any reason for not renaming the target executable to mutt-kz?
Again my comment is as a user, since mutt-kz is in every way backwards
compatible with mutt I think it would be more consistent to keep the
executable name same. For example both uses the same user startup
file, ~/.muttrc, the configuration formats are same, and so on.
Cheers,
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
10 years, 11 months
Upstream tracking
by Raghavendra D Prabhu
Hi,
I see that mutt (hg) -- http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/ -- seems to
be active again. So, are these upstream changes merged into mutt-kz periodically?
Regards,
--
Raghavendra Prabhu
GPG Id : 0xD72BE977
Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977
www: wnohang.net
11 years
M-b~@~Y in place of quote
by Vikas Rawal
Since I shifted from the precompiled version of mutt from debian's
repositories to self-compiled mutt-kz, mutt has been showing M-b~@~Y
in place of '. So, for example, "Don't" shows up as "DonM-b~@~Y".
What could be the problem?
Vikas
11 years
Installation of mutt-kz in debian
by Vikas Rawal
I am trying to install mutt-kz in debian. But when I do
./configure --enable-notmuch
it complains: configure: error: Unable to find Notmuch library
I have notmuch packages installed. What could be the problem?
Vikas
11 years
Patches for consideration
by Phil Pennock
I've three patches relative to mutt 1.5.21 at:
<http://people.spodhuis.org/phil.pennock/software/mutt-patches/>
I believe that the "TLS v1.1 and v1.2" functionality is now in mutt.
"TLS ServerNameIndication" support would be handy. I know that my
SMTP mail-server is capable of handing out different certs for different
hostnames and Submission is where that makes the most sense.
The "Gmail custom search IMAP extension" functionality works, but has
some rough edges; I'd forgotten most of the mutt internals and didn't
come back up to speed for writing that patch. It works well enough for
me, that I can use =/ to do a server-side search using the Gmail query
syntax.
There have been posts from me (<various>@spodhuis.org) to the mutt-dev
list with more details on each patch, if you're curious.
Regards,
-Phil
11 years
Opening virtual folder performance
by Ross Lagerwall
Hi,
I use notmuch-deliver with procmail to retrieve my mail and then use mutt-kz
to view it. The problem that I am having is that mutt-kz takes 10s of seconds
to open a virtual folder the first time after power on. After that, opening it
is almost instant. During this time, it appears to grind my hard disk. I have
tried setting header caching to a file or directory but in neither case does it
actually cache any headers.
This is with notmuch 0.15.2 and folders with between 500 and 1000 mails in it.
In other words, not much.
Any ideas on what may cause this issue?
Thanks
--
Ross Lagerwall
11 years
