Hi Dale,
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 11:33 -0800, Dale Bewley wrote:
[root@localhost ~]# NETCF_DEBUG=1 ncftool
warning: augeas initialization had errors
please file a bug with the following lines in the bug report:
/augeas/files/etc/sysconfig/iptables/error = "parse_failed"
/augeas/files/etc/sysconfig/iptables/error/pos = "0"
/augeas/files/etc/sysconfig/iptables/error/line = "1"
/augeas/files/etc/sysconfig/iptables/error/char = "0"
/augeas/files/etc/sysconfig/iptables/error/lens =
"/usr/share/augeas/lenses/dist/iptables.aug:59.10-.32"
/augeas/files/etc/sysconfig/iptables/error/message = "Iterated lens matched less
than it should"
Failed to initialize netcf
error: unspecified error
error: errors in loading some config files
The mystery to me is why netcf even looks at your iptables config -
since you have the bridge module loaded, the
file /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables should exist, and per
the F12 defaults, should have a 0 in it. That tells netcf not to bother
with iptables.
I also discovered that after no changes to any configurations,
a restart of the network makes ncftool/augeas happy.
That could either be something changing bridge-nf-call-iptables or
something fiddling with iptables config.
I found that if I remove '-m comment --comment "Forwarding
for VM
bridges"' then ncftool is happy, even after a fresh reboot. So,
perhaps it's an augeas bug with the comment module in iptables?
That's part of it - the lens is just good enough for the common
directives that system-config-firewall and its ilk use. I'll try and add
some smarts about the comment module.
David