Today I started with packaging some of the XO activities for Fedora 9. Unfortunately I not able to build any packages because I'm running in a python trackback. Traceback (most recent call last): File "./setup.py", line 21, in <module> bundlebuilder.start() TypeError: start() takes exactly 1 argument (0 given) Even if I try the sugar-log.spec from Simpon Schampijer I recieve this error message. Missing dependencies? Wrong parameter? Wrong setup of my machine?

Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 00:22 +0200, Fabian Affolter wrote: >> >> Today I started with packaging some of the XO activities for Fedora 9. >> Unfortunately I not able to build any packages because I'm running in a >> python trackback. >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "./setup.py", line 21, in <module> >> bundlebuilder.start() >> TypeError: start() takes exactly 1 argument (0 given) >> >> Even if I try the sugar-log.spec from Simpon Schampijer I recieve this >> error message. Missing dependencies? Wrong parameter? Wrong setup of >> my machine? > > Which version of the sugar stack? bundlebuilder.start() used to take an > argument but no longer does with current Sugar > > Jeremy I saw this building the binary on an F9 machine. Now, I build the source tarball on F9 and use koji to build the binary.

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu(a)tomeuvizoso.net&gt;wrote: > As Jeremy said, you seem to have either too recent activities or a too > old sugar stack. This commit adapted the Browse activity to the new > API, and broke it with the older: > > > http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=web-activity;a=commitdiff;h=9afbf7e567ff602f0... > > So I guess that if F9 cannot update to a newer Sugar, then older > activities should be used. Fedora 9 packages are obsolete and doesn't really work at the moment :( Even if we updated Sugar we would be in troubles with pyxpcom. I'd prefer to keep focusing on Fedora 10 for now, since there is quite a bit of work to do there yet and the freeze is approaching. Marco