https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Bug ID: 1166697 Summary: Review Request: mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good - MinGW build of GStreamer good plugins Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: vtosodec@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-... SRPM URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-... Description: Cross compiled GStreamer1 media framework good plug-ins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
--- Comment #1 from Victor Toso de Carvalho vtosodec@redhat.com --- I forgot to include the Patch1 URL. Patch1 URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/0001-rtspsrc-fix-for-mike...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lureau@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcandre.lureau@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
--- Comment #2 from Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lureau@redhat.com --- - why did you package 1.3.2 and not 1.4.4 ? - global gstreamer gstreamer1 doesn't seem to be used - bogus changelog date
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (v2)", "*No copyright* LGPL (v2 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like) LGPL (v2 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL", "BSD (2 clause) GPL (v2 or later)", "BSD (3 clause)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright* LGPL (v2.1 or later)". 78 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/elmarco/pkg/1166697-mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [?]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys- root/mingw/share/gstreamer-1.0, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys- root/mingw/share/gstreamer-1.0 [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys- root/mingw/share/gstreamer-1.0, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys- root/mingw/share/gstreamer-1.0
Probably should be fixed in gstreamer1
I would own: (like non-mingw package) {mingw32_datadir}/gstreamer-%{api_version}/presets/
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [?]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
Unnecessary with 1.4.4 I guess
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.3.2-1.fc21.noarch.rpm mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.3.2-1.fc21.noarch.rpm mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.3.2-1.fc21.src.rpm mingw32-gstreamer1-plugins-good.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer mingw64-gstreamer1-plugins-good.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src:198: W: macro-in-comment %{mingw32_libdir} mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src:198: W: macro-in-comment %{api_version} mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src:266: W: macro-in-comment %{mingw64_libdir} mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src:266: W: macro-in-comment %{api_version} mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good.src: E: specfile-error warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Nov 21 2014 - Victor Toso victortoso@redhat.com - 1.3.2 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lureau@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
--- Comment #3 from Victor Toso de Carvalho vtosodec@redhat.com --- (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #2)
- why did you package 1.3.2 and not 1.4.4 ?
- global gstreamer gstreamer1 doesn't seem to be used
- bogus changelog date
Fixed.
Spec URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/1/mingw-gstreamer1-plugin...
SRPM URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/1/mingw-gstreamer1-plugin...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lureau@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lureau@redhat.com --- looks good to me, with a slightly better changelog comment, with mention to this bug would be nice
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
--- Comment #5 from Victor Toso de Carvalho vtosodec@redhat.com --- (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #4)
looks good to me, with a slightly better changelog comment, with mention to this bug would be nice
Included link to this bug
Spec URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/2/mingw-gstreamer1-plugin...
SRPM URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/2/mingw-gstreamer1-plugin...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
--- Comment #6 from Victor Toso de Carvalho vtosodec@redhat.com --- Changelog changed to: Initial packaging. Fixes rhbz#1166697
Spec URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/3/mingw-gstreamer1-plugin...
SRPM URL: http://www.thatsallfolks.org/~toso/mingw-gst1-good/3/mingw-gstreamer1-plugin...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lureau@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lureau@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good Short Description: Cross compiled GStreamer1 plug-ins good Upstream URL: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/ Owners: victortoso elmarco Branches: f21 InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- WARNING: "victortoso" is not in the packager group.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Victor Toso victortoso@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |victortoso@redhat.com Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Victor Toso victortoso@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #9 from Victor Toso victortoso@redhat.com --- removing the FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Fabiano FidĂȘncio fidencio@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fidencio@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Fabiano FidĂȘncio fidencio@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good Short Description: Cross compiled GStreamer1 plug-ins good Upstream URL: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/ Owners: elmarco fidencio Branches: f21 InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166697
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-go | |od-1.4.4-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2015-01-03 14:06:29
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.4.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org