[Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner(a)gmx.net 2006-05-01 04:08 EST -------
So I am working again:)
And what is ctapi-cyberjack devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so??
It is an simble lib and no static oder header file.
So why it is called an devel file??
But I can not find the pronlem for the
"E: ctapi-cyberjack library-not-linked-against-libc"
ldd say's this is linked again libc:(
ldd /usr/lib/libctapi-cyberjack.so
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00d37000)
/lib/libNoVersion.so.1 (0x007b6000)
libusb-0.1.so.4 => /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x0091e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x007c2000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00d38000)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 11 months
[Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262
bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package-
|list(a)redhat.com |review(a)redhat.com
jpmahowald(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |jpmahowald(a)gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald(a)gmail.com 2006-04-30 22:09 EST -------
rpmlint checks return:
E: kchmviewer old-menu-entry /usr/share/applnk/kchmviewer.desktop
Not necessary with it already in /usr/share/applications
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- .desktop file ok
%description's a bit long, but oh well.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 11 months
[Bug 166470] Review Request: taskjuggler
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: taskjuggler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166470
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald(a)gmail.com 2006-04-30 21:20 EST -------
E: taskjuggler binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/TaskJugglerUI
['/usr/lib64', '/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib']
Try configure --disable-rpath
W: taskjuggler devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so
It's a symlink, no big deal
E: taskjuggler zero-length
/usr/share/apps/taskjuggler/templates/en_US/Blank_File.tji
Ignore.
E: taskjuggler library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so.3.0.3
E: taskjuggler library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so.3.0.3
* Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment
(wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake)
* No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag.
.desktop file needs some work, use desktop-file-install
* Desktop file: vendor should be fedora
(wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop)
* Scriptlets: missing update-desktop-database
(wiki: ScriptletSnippets)
* Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain X-Fedora
(wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop)
* Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application
(wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop)
* Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post (wiki: ScriptletSnippets)
* Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets)
The /usr/share/doc/HTML conflicts with Fedora's stuff, this and probably the
contents of packages/taskjuggler should be flagged with %doc instead.
Any way to remove the .la file?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 11 months