June 2006 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 bdpepple(a)ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple(a)ameritech.net 2006-06-01 15:32 EST ------- MD5Sums: b5366181170e473c918537af145adafb monodoc-1.1.13.tar.gz Good: * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Builds fine in Mock Minor: * Any reason why you use '%define _libdir %{_exec_prefix}/lib' instead of '%define _libdir /usr/lib'? Your macro doesn't appear to be fixing anything, and needs be corrected before importing into CVS. Notes: * rpmlint gives the following error, which can be ignored since it's a mono package: E: monodoc no-binary E: monodoc only-non-binary-in-usr-lib * In the future, it would make reviewing easier if you used the spec file templates from the fedora-rpmdevtools package. +1 ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 193794] New: Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193794 Summary: Review Request: prosper - A LaTeX class to produce high quality slides Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info ReportedBy: orion(a)cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/prosper.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/prosper-0.cvs20060601-1.src.rpm Description: Prosper is a LaTeX class aiming at offering an environment for writing high-quality slides for both printing and displaying with a video-projector. It offers many features for lively presentations, such as incremental display. LaTeX package naming appears to be somewhat in flux. Should this be "texmf-prosper", "latex-prosper", or ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost(a)cnoc.nl 2006-06-01 11:53 EST ------- Ok, done: Spec: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus.spec SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.16-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182415 dmitry(a)butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |dmitry(a)butskoy.name OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry(a)butskoy.name 2006-06-01 11:46 EST ------- Since comment #4 all your urls appear wrapped, I cannot "just click" them. IMHO bugzilla input forms never auto-wraps such url lines... ?.. The built package still contains non-utf manuals. Consult, for example, man-pages-ru to get idea how to fix this (using iconv(1) etc.) It seems that there is no any official version yet, perhaps it is better in such situation to use versioning scheme similar to "man-pages-ja" package (:)), i.e. the cvs date as the version. But it is not so good from the point of view of FE Package Guidelines. Maybe ask maillists about this issue (i.e., the versioning of a cvs stuff which has no any versions at all). Or perhaps it was discussed somewhere earlier? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182415 ------- Additional Comments From andy(a)smile.org.ua 2006-06-01 07:51 EST ------- Rename version here: Spec Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/man-pages- uk.spec SRPM Name or Url: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/man-pages- uk-0.1-0.1.20060328.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-06-01 05:26 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/mysql-connector-net.spec Updated spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-06-01 05:00 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop-0.11-2.src.rpm Bump to 0.11 Fixes for x86_64/ia64 PKG_CONFIG_PATH fix added in Includes devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-06-01 04:59 EST ------- SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-06-01 04:57 EST ------- SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc-1.1.13-9.src.rpm Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc.spec Changes Fixed the /usr/bin problem (#18) Disabled debug package (#18} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti(a)libero.it 2006-06-01 04:52 EST ------- Ok! Thank you very much for support. I think it is necessary for me to have a sponsor and I would be happy if you could be my sponsor. But now I need some detail about CVS, because I'm not used to it. Sponsor can also import my packgage into cvs? Bye -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review June 2006