January 2007 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald(a)gmail.com 2007-01-03 23:19 EST ------- More devel x86_64 build error fun: + cd lazarus + fpcmake Processing Makefile.fpc Error: Target "linux", package "rtl" not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 kevin(a)tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin(a)tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2007-01-03 22:27 EST ------- There is a policy to deal with this sort of thing: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews Consider this to indicate that the review is stalled and that a response is needed soon. If there is no response in 1 week, we will move this back to NEW and someone else can review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec(a)hp.com 2007-01-03 20:54 EST ------- So a new version of mondo is available and I hope it will meet Fedora Extra requirements. ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mondo-2.2.1-1.fc5.src.rpm TIA for your feedback -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec(a)hp.com 2007-01-03 20:47 EST ------- As promised the latest version is now there: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-1.2.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Could I have a feedback on this one please ? I also have the mindi-busybox package to consider: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-1.fc5.src.rpm I tried to fix the problems reported in this report. Let me know what the staus could be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff(a)ocjtech.us 2007-01-03 16:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #80) > OpenPBX sounds are OK though -- can we use those? The majority of the OpenPBX and Asterisk sounds probably still use the same script (except for "OpenPBX" being substituted for "Asterisk" of course). How annoying those differences between the scripts would take some experimentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2(a)redhat.com 2007-01-03 15:52 EST ------- OpenPBX sounds are OK though -- can we use those? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff(a)ocjtech.us 2007-01-03 14:34 EST ------- Hmmm yeah, I keep forgetting about the sounds... I don't think that the sounds free enough to be included in Fedora, because ISTR that they place restrictions on using the sounds with anything but Asterisk. I wasn't able to find the exact wording of the licensing though. They also don't include the "source" (the high-quality masters) but that may or may not be a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve(a)silug.org 2007-01-03 14:14 EST ------- Next problem... Without the core sounds, an attempt to use blind transfer disconnects the call. [Jan 3 12:02:06] WARNING[7091]: file.c:553 ast_openstream_full: File pbx-transfer does not exist in any format [Jan 3 12:02:06] WARNING[7091]: file.c:805 ast_streamfile: Unable to open pbx-transfer (format 0x8 (alaw)): No such file or directory == Spawn extension (remote, s, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' If we can't freely redistribute the core sounds, should the package maybe include an easy way to download them? (Or is the license on the sounds free enough that they can be distributed in a separate package?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 216102] New: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas(a)apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-tw... SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-tw... Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Conch is an SSHv2 implementation written in Python. SSH is a protocol designed to allow remote access to shells and commands, but it is generic enough to allow everything from TCP forwarding to generic filesystem access. Since conch is written in Python, it interfaces well with other Python projects, such as Imagination. Conch also includes a implementations of the telnet and vt102 protocols, as well as support for rudamentary line editing behaviors. A new implementation of Twisted's Manhole application is also included, featuring server-side input history and interactive syntax coloring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2007-01-03 12:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Paul, the new spec file looks great, and I agree that bug #129724 is a bug in > the upstream package. My impression is that Chip won't be fixing it anytime > soon, so if we're ok with living with it, the package is fine as far as I'm > concerned. Great stuff. I already approved the package earlier so feel free to import and built it etc. (I assume you're still happy to own this package?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review January 2007