package-review September 2010

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
1923 discussions

[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #108 from Dave Ludlow <dave(a)adsllc.com> 2010-09-11 14:19:06 EDT --- Paul from Comment #106 - There is no Fedora-supported answer at this time. I would suggest the following links: http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/support.php http://sourceforge.net/projects/hylafax/files/ I appreciate your situation, but please keep this bug on the topic of Lee's packaging review and not support for the software itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 Dave Ludlow <dave(a)adsllc.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave(a)adsllc.com --- Comment #107 from Dave Ludlow <dave(a)adsllc.com> 2010-09-11 14:03:13 EDT --- Lee - I'm not a sponsor, so I can't do much directly. You've clearly put a lot (!) of work into this and I just wanted to give you an "atta boy!". This is a complicated package, for a lot of reasons. Clearly you're still interested, since you continue to attach version updates, but it looks like Jason stopped having fun a while ago. :) My free, unsolicited advice is to hit https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel [good] or irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-devel [better] to see if you can get a fresh sponsor or rekindle Jason's interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 paul <paullee0(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paullee0(a)gmail.com --- Comment #106 from paul <paullee0(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-11 12:23:00 EDT --- Hi there, I am looking around for a rpm for latest Hylafax server for Fedora 13 (or 14?) but found Hylafax.org only offer package for Fedora 10. I am not sure if this is right place to ask. I have installed a hylafax server on a Redhat 9.0 and have just recently want to install another one on a F13. Do you think the rpm for Fedora 10 built by hylafax.org is ok for installation on F13? Where could I find more information about this hylafax server installation on Fedora (w/ SELinux). Thanks in advance. paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 628631] New: Review Request: rubygem-httparty - Makes HTTP fun! Also, makes consuming restful web services dead easy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-httparty - Makes HTTP fun! Also, makes consuming restful web services dead easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628631 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-httparty - Makes HTTP fun! Also, makes consuming restful web services dead easy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-httparty.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-httparty-0.6.1-1.fc15.src.r… Description: Makes HTTP fun! Also, makes consuming restful web services dead easy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 632853] New: Review Request: pptpd - PoPToP Point to Point Tunneling Server
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pptpd - PoPToP Point to Point Tunneling Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632853 Summary: Review Request: pptpd - PoPToP Point to Point Tunneling Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dave(a)adsllc.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/pptpd.spec SRPM URL: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pptpd-1.3.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This implements a Virtual Private Networking Server (VPN) that is compatible with Microsoft VPN clients. It allows windows users to connect to an internal firewalled network using their dialup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 226370] New: Merge Review: rhdb-utils
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226370 Summary: Merge Review: rhdb-utils Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com CC: tgl(a)redhat.com Fedora Merge Review: rhdb-utils http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rhdb-utils/ Initial Owner: tgl(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 6

[Bug 624865] New: Review Request: minion - Fast, Scalable Constraint Solving
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: minion - Fast, Scalable Constraint Solving https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624865 Summary: Review Request: minion - Fast, Scalable Constraint Solving Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexisis-pristontale(a)hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/alexises/packaging/minion/minion.spec SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/alexises/packaging/minion/minion-0.10-1.… Description: MINION is a new constraint solver, which is very fast and scales well as problem size increases. Empirical results on standard benchmarks show orders of magnitude performance gains over state-of-the-art constraint toolkits. These gains increase with problem size --- MINION delivers scalable constraint solving. rpmlint outputs : minion.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US toolkits -> toolkit, tool kits, tool-kits --- false positive minion.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary minion --- false positive : no manpage provided minion-examples.noarch: W: no-documentation --- false positive : doc. already present on minion-doc package minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/SportsSchedule/MinionSportsInstanceGenerator.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/SAT_pigeon/pigeon_gen.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/Solitaire/solitaire-solver.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/Graceful/GracefulMinionGenerator.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/PrimeQueens/MinionPrimeQueenInstanceGenerator.h minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/Golomb/GolombTable.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/indicator/indicator.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/SportsSchedule/MinionSportsInstanceGenerator.h minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/Steelmill/steelmill-solver.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/graph_sym.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/PrimeQueens/MinionPrimeQueenInstanceGenerator.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/Golomb/GolombMinionGenerator.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/Langford/langford.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/alternating_gen.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/InstanceHelp.h minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/Bibd/MinionBIBDInstanceGenerator.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/nqueens-JFP/nqueensgen.cpp minion-examples.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/minion/examples/generators/Bibd/MinionBIBDInstanceGenerator.h ---- false positive : this package provides example codes as defined by upstream 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 21 warnings. Thanks to Minion developers for their helpful help on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 620556] New: Review Request: folks - GObject/C/Vala contact aggregation library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: folks - GObject/C/Vala contact aggregation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620556 Summary: Review Request: folks - GObject/C/Vala contact aggregation library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yaneti(a)declera.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/folks/folks.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/folks/folks-0.1.11-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: libfolks is a library that aggregates people from multiple sources (e.g. Telepathy connection managers and eventually evolution data server, Facebook, etc.) to create meta-contacts. Build requirement for newest empathy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 30

[Bug 226013] New: Merge Review: libgnomecups
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226013 Summary: Merge Review: libgnomecups Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com CC: davidz(a)redhat.com Fedora Merge Review: libgnomecups http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnomecups/ Initial Owner: davidz(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 4

[Bug 225841] New: Merge Review: gnome-user-docs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '10

11 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225841 Summary: Merge Review: gnome-user-docs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com CC: rstrode(a)redhat.com Fedora Merge Review: gnome-user-docs http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-user-docs/ Initial Owner: rstrode(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 11

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review September 2010