February 2014 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 755510] New: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510 Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.vieville(a)univ-valenciennes.fr QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/gnome-shell-extension-system-moni... SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/gnome-shell-extension-system-moni... SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/gnome-shell-extension-system-moni... Project URL: https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet Description: Display system informations in gnome shell status bar, such as memory usage, cpu usage, network rates… $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-1.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-1.fc16.noarch.rpm gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/system-monitor-applet-config gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary system-monitor-applet-config 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. As the SPEC file can build this gnome-shell-extension for F-15 and F-16, here is the rpmlint outputs on F-15 files. I was unable to deal with rpmlint errors with F-15 srpm file on a F-16 host (confusion about "dist" and "fedora" macros I suppose). But to be complete, mock builds this package for F-15 and F-16 without any problems. I haven't tried with rawhide. Should I? This is my first review for Fedora and my skill in such things is not complete. $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-1.fc15.src.rpm 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/rpmlint", line 379, in <module> main() File "/usr/bin/rpmlint", line 169, in main runChecks(pkg) File "/usr/bin/rpmlint", line 229, in runChecks check.check(pkg) File "/usr/share/rpmlint/SpecCheck.py", line 143, in check self.check_spec(pkg, self._spec_file) File "/usr/share/rpmlint/SpecCheck.py", line 564, in check_spec pkgfile = pkg.files()[url.split("/")[-1]] KeyError: 'paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-78-g14ef176.tar.gz' $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-1.fc15.noarch.rpm gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/system-monitor-applet-config gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary system-monitor-applet-config 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This review request comes after this bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710386 I'm a newcomer in such things for Fedora and not very familiar with packaging, but I'm volunteer for this package. I'll try to understand and to respect all the documentation and guidelines available on the contributor's part of the Fedora Web site, but any comments on the question are welcome. Last but not the least, as a newcomer, I'm also seeking a sponsor. Thanks in advance for your comments. Cordially, -- NVieville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

2
123
0 / 0

[Bug 1028743] New: Review Request: hans - IP over ICMP tunneling solution

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028743 Bug ID: 1028743 Summary: Review Request: hans - IP over ICMP tunneling solution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: pahan(a)hubbitus.info QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/d26aadd89b75ebd87c30b6c8... SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora19/hans/hans-0.4.3-2.fc19.src.rpm Description: Hans makes it possible to tunnel IPv4 through ICMP echo packets, so you could call it a ping tunnel. This can be useful when you find yourself in the situation that your Internet access is firewalled, but pings are allowed. Hans runs on Linux as a client and a server. It runs on Mac OS X, iPhone/iPod touch, FreeBSD and OpenBSD as a client only. Fedora Account System Username: Hubbitus Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6161766 One note also about rpmlint warning only-non-binary-in-usr-lib it already present rpmlint bug: bz#794777. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

6 years, 7 months

2
37
0 / 0

[Bug 823226] New: Review Request: sqlheavy - GObject wrapper for SQLite

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226 Bug ID: 823226 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: sqlheavy - GObject wrapper for SQLite Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: aalves(a)gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy-0.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: SQLHeavy is a wrapper on top of SQLite with a GObject-based interface Fedora Account System Username: alvesadrian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

2
6
0 / 0

[Bug 806117] New: Review Request: Oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117 Summary: Review Request: Oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: abdel.g.martinez.l(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://potty.fedorapeople.org/Oplop/1.6-1/Oplop.spec SRPM URL: http://potty.fedorapeople.org/Oplop/1.6-1/Oplop-1.6-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Using a single master password and various nicknames, one can create an infinite number of unique account passwords. These unique account passwords are commonly called password hashes, domain-specific passwords, or per-site passwords. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

2
27
0 / 0

[Bug 969763] New: Review Request: taudem - Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969763 Bug ID: 969763 Summary: Review Request: taudem - Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: volker27(a)gmx.at QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/taudem.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/taudem-5.2-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: TauDEM (Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models) is a suite of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) tools for the extraction and analysis of hydrologic information from topography as represented by a DEM. Fedora Account System Username: volter I'm not totally sure about the sub-package layout and the MPI naming suffix. There's no serial version and only one supported MPI implementation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SGAiiN9JWR&a=cc_unsubscribe

6 years, 8 months

2
5
0 / 0

[Bug 1056054] New: Review Request: ibsim - InfiniBand network simulator

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056054 Bug ID: 1056054 Summary: Review Request: ibsim - InfiniBand network simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jonstanley(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dledford(a)redhat.com, fenlason(a)redhat.com, fullung(a)gmail.com, jonstanley(a)gmail.com, jpopelka(a)redhat.com, jstanley(a)rmrf.net, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, volker27(a)gmx.at Depends On: 773492 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #773492 +++ ibsim allows you to create a topology file that represents your InfiniBand fabric and then hook the ibsim application in between your end user application and the fabric itself and then use ibsim to create fake fabric events that your application will then see (such as link up/link down/packet loss/etc). If you aren't well versed in InfiniBand fabric management or know what a MAD packet is, this application is not for you. It is a very low level, get your hands dirty program. However, to someone who wants to see exactly how an application will perform under specific circumstances it will simulate those circumstances without the application knowing the difference between the simulation or the real event. Packages can be found at: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Package%20Review/ --- Additional comment from Doug Ledford on 2012-01-11 18:28:13 EST --- [dledford@schwoop SPECS]$ rpmlint ibsim.spec ../SRPMS/ibsim-0.5-5.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/ibsim-* ibsim.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US infiniband -> infinitude ibsim.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US infiniband -> infinitude ibsim.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ibsim 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. --- Additional comment from Doug Ledford on 2012-01-11 18:28:38 EST --- --- Additional comment from Albert Strasheim on 2012-01-12 00:52:13 EST --- Looks good. --- Additional comment from Jiri Popelka on 2012-06-29 10:28:23 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ==== C/C++ ==== [-]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: MUST Package is not relocatable. [x]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. %{_libdir}/umad2sim/libumad2sim.so is ok in main package because it's not used for development. Also there seem to be no versioned library files installed, so %{_libdir}/umad2sim/libumad2sim*.so* could be I think changed to %{_libdir}/umad2sim/libumad2sim.so ==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: MUST Buildroot is not present See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 No need to use %defattr macro, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [!]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#ExcludeArch_.26_ExclusiveArch https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#Tracker_Bugs https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Fa... [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [!]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. It creates %{_libdir}/umad2sim/, doesn't it ? [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. Just some harmless warnings. [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 8f4928dbee64b0c0caaf838d03d95a86 MD5SUM upstream package : 8f4928dbee64b0c0caaf838d03d95a86 [x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. I didn't find any openib[-diag] package, so I think the Conflicts: openib-diags < 1.3 line could be removed. --- Additional comment from Jon Stanley on 2012-10-22 15:58:14 EDT --- I'll take this review from Doug after talking with him. I'll get this one taken care of shortly. --- Additional comment from Jon Stanley on 2012-10-25 00:50:48 EDT --- New SRPM: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/ibsim-0.5-6.20120810git.fc19.src.rpm New spec: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/ibsim.spec --- Additional comment from Volker Fröhlich on 2013-04-17 11:44:30 EDT --- I think you should open a new review request then. --- Additional comment from Jon Stanley on 2013-04-17 14:22:54 EDT --- Huh? This is just a change in maintainer from Doug to me. I'll happily open a new request if wanted, but it doesn't seem to apply in this case. --- Additional comment from Thomas Moschny on 2013-04-27 14:45:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Huh? This is just a change in maintainer from Doug to me. I'll happily open > a new request if wanted, but it doesn't seem to apply in this case. The last section in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews can be read in such a way that when the original submitter is not going to finish the submission, a new ticket shall be opened by the new/next submitter. While meant for the case of a not responding submitter, I'd say the procedure itself also fits here. --- Additional comment from Volker Fröhlich on 2014-01-18 18:55:57 EST --- Now how is this going to continue? --- Additional comment from Jiri Popelka on 2014-01-20 07:43:51 EST --- Wow, looks like the one who's actually been unresponsive here has been me - no idea why I haven't responded to comment #6. Anyway, Jon, as others pointed out it'd probably be better to fill a new request and make this one duplicate of it. Could you do that ? Thanks --- Additional comment from Jon Stanley on 2014-01-21 08:33:10 EST --- Sure thing. Since there's nothing different from this bug other than the maintainer, I'm just going to clone it. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773492 [Bug 773492] Review Request: ibsim - InfiniBand network simulator -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

6 years, 8 months

2
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1028818] New: Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028818 Bug ID: 1028818 Summary: Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pyplete.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pyplete-0.0.5-1.fc20.src... Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6163424 FAS: patches Description: PyPlete provides dynamic autocompletion for Python. It uses pysmell but unlike the standard version of it, PyPlete is dynamic, it does not need to execute a command to pre-analyze the code. It is useful for analyzing (or autocompleting) Python code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

6 years, 8 months

2
15
0 / 0

[Bug 1067015] New: Review Request: instack-undercloud - Install an OpenStack undercloud via python-instack

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067015 Bug ID: 1067015 Summary: Review Request: instack-undercloud - Install an OpenStack undercloud via python-instack Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jslagle(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/agroup/tripleo-rpm-spec-files/master/instack-under... SRPM URL: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack-m/openstack-m/fedora-20/SRP... Description: instack-undercloud is a collection of installation tools to install an undercloud via python-instack. It contains scripts and elements to complete the installation. Fedora Account System Username: slagle koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6547303 This is one of my first package submissions for Fedora, and I need a sponsor. I have a few more package review requests that I'll be submitting for the other OpenStack TripleO related projects. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

6 years, 8 months

2
23
0 / 0

[Bug 960201] New: Review Request: libyui-qt-graph - Qt Graph Widget for libyui

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960201 Bug ID: 960201 Summary: Review Request: libyui-qt-graph - Qt Graph Widget for libyui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: bjoern.esser(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Category: --- Spec URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/libyui/SPECS/libyui-qt-graph.spec SRPM URL: http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/libyui/SRPMS/libyui-qt-graph-2.42.4-1.fc... Description: This package contains the Qt graph component for libyui This package depends on libyui which has it's review request in #959926 and also waits for a sponsor, so testing with koji was not possible at the moment. Fedora Account System Username: besser82 Hello! This is one my first packages I want to contribute to Fedora, so I need a sponsor. I am in good contact to upstream, esp. to the lead-maintainer and have direct-push access to the libyui github-repos, too. BR, Björn Esser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TsQe9Q55fE&a=cc_unsubscribe

6 years, 9 months

2
43
0 / 0

[Bug 807476] New: Review Request:evm-utils -IMA/EVM support utilities

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:evm-utils -IMA/EVM support utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807476 Summary: Review Request:evm-utils -IMA/EVM support utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pwouters(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/ima/evm-utils.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/ima/evm-utils-0.1-1.20110337gitae4710111.fc17.src.rpm Description: IMA/EVM support utilities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 10 months

2
16
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review February 2014