package-review August 2014

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
2254 discussions

[Bug 823226] New: Review Request: sqlheavy - GObject wrapper for SQLite
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '17

05 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226 Bug ID: 823226 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: sqlheavy - GObject wrapper for SQLite Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: aalves(a)gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/sqlheavy-0.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: SQLHeavy is a wrapper on top of SQLite with a GObject-based interface Fedora Account System Username: alvesadrian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 806117] New: Review Request: Oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '17

05 Oct '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117 Summary: Review Request: Oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: abdel.g.martinez.l(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://potty.fedorapeople.org/Oplop/1.6-1/Oplop.spec SRPM URL: http://potty.fedorapeople.org/Oplop/1.6-1/Oplop-1.6-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Using a single master password and various nicknames, one can create an infinite number of unique account passwords. These unique account passwords are commonly called password hashes, domain-specific passwords, or per-site passwords. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 27

[Bug 1094015] New: Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '17

02 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 Bug ID: 1094015 Summary: Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: pswo10680(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://zerng07.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/cwtex-q-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://zerng07.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/cwtex-q-fonts-0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: The cwTeX fonts were originally created by Tsong-Min Wu and Tsong-Huey Wu from 1999-2004. The fonts was later organized and modified by Edward G.J. Lee from 2005-2007. cwtex-q-fonts project was run by Chen-Pan Liao since 2008. The goal is to modify cwTeX fonts to provide higher quality and comfort. Fedora Account System Username: zerng07 This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 26

[Bug 1111692] New: Review Request: purple-whatsapp - Libpurple plug-in for Pidgin and others, supporting WhatsApp protocol
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '17

01 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111692 Bug ID: 1111692 Summary: Review Request: purple-whatsapp - Libpurple plug-in for Pidgin and others, supporting WhatsApp protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/purple-whatsapp.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/purple-whatsapp-0.4-1.20140413git.src.rpm Description: This is a WhatsApp plugin for Pidgin and libpurple messengers. It connects to the WhatsApp servers using the password (which needs to be retrieved separately). Only one client can connect at a time (including your phone). Fedora Account System Username: robert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 5

[Bug 969763] New: Review Request: taudem - Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Sep '17

28 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969763 Bug ID: 969763 Summary: Review Request: taudem - Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: volker27(a)gmx.at QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/taudem.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/taudem-5.2-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: TauDEM (Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models) is a suite of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) tools for the extraction and analysis of hydrologic information from topography as represented by a DEM. Fedora Account System Username: volter I'm not totally sure about the sub-package layout and the MPI naming suffix. There's no serial version and only one supported MPI implementation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SGAiiN9JWR&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 5

[Bug 1056054] New: Review Request: ibsim - InfiniBand network simulator
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Sep '17

28 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056054 Bug ID: 1056054 Summary: Review Request: ibsim - InfiniBand network simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jonstanley(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dledford(a)redhat.com, fenlason(a)redhat.com, fullung(a)gmail.com, jonstanley(a)gmail.com, jpopelka(a)redhat.com, jstanley(a)rmrf.net, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, volker27(a)gmx.at Depends On: 773492 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #773492 +++ ibsim allows you to create a topology file that represents your InfiniBand fabric and then hook the ibsim application in between your end user application and the fabric itself and then use ibsim to create fake fabric events that your application will then see (such as link up/link down/packet loss/etc). If you aren't well versed in InfiniBand fabric management or know what a MAD packet is, this application is not for you. It is a very low level, get your hands dirty program. However, to someone who wants to see exactly how an application will perform under specific circumstances it will simulate those circumstances without the application knowing the difference between the simulation or the real event. Packages can be found at: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Package%20Review/ --- Additional comment from Doug Ledford on 2012-01-11 18:28:13 EST --- [dledford@schwoop SPECS]$ rpmlint ibsim.spec ../SRPMS/ibsim-0.5-5.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/ibsim-* ibsim.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US infiniband -> infinitude ibsim.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US infiniband -> infinitude ibsim.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ibsim 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. --- Additional comment from Doug Ledford on 2012-01-11 18:28:38 EST --- --- Additional comment from Albert Strasheim on 2012-01-12 00:52:13 EST --- Looks good. --- Additional comment from Jiri Popelka on 2012-06-29 10:28:23 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ==== C/C++ ==== [-]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: MUST Package is not relocatable. [x]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. %{_libdir}/umad2sim/libumad2sim.so is ok in main package because it's not used for development. Also there seem to be no versioned library files installed, so %{_libdir}/umad2sim/libumad2sim*.so* could be I think changed to %{_libdir}/umad2sim/libumad2sim.so ==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: MUST Buildroot is not present See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 No need to use %defattr macro, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [!]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#ExcludeArch_.26_ExclusiveArch https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#Tracker_Bugs https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Fail… [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [!]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. It creates %{_libdir}/umad2sim/, doesn't it ? [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. Just some harmless warnings. [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 8f4928dbee64b0c0caaf838d03d95a86 MD5SUM upstream package : 8f4928dbee64b0c0caaf838d03d95a86 [x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. I didn't find any openib[-diag] package, so I think the Conflicts: openib-diags < 1.3 line could be removed. --- Additional comment from Jon Stanley on 2012-10-22 15:58:14 EDT --- I'll take this review from Doug after talking with him. I'll get this one taken care of shortly. --- Additional comment from Jon Stanley on 2012-10-25 00:50:48 EDT --- New SRPM: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/ibsim-0.5-6.20120810git.fc19.src.rpm New spec: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/ibsim.spec --- Additional comment from Volker Fröhlich on 2013-04-17 11:44:30 EDT --- I think you should open a new review request then. --- Additional comment from Jon Stanley on 2013-04-17 14:22:54 EDT --- Huh? This is just a change in maintainer from Doug to me. I'll happily open a new request if wanted, but it doesn't seem to apply in this case. --- Additional comment from Thomas Moschny on 2013-04-27 14:45:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Huh? This is just a change in maintainer from Doug to me. I'll happily open > a new request if wanted, but it doesn't seem to apply in this case. The last section in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews can be read in such a way that when the original submitter is not going to finish the submission, a new ticket shall be opened by the new/next submitter. While meant for the case of a not responding submitter, I'd say the procedure itself also fits here. --- Additional comment from Volker Fröhlich on 2014-01-18 18:55:57 EST --- Now how is this going to continue? --- Additional comment from Jiri Popelka on 2014-01-20 07:43:51 EST --- Wow, looks like the one who's actually been unresponsive here has been me - no idea why I haven't responded to comment #6. Anyway, Jon, as others pointed out it'd probably be better to fill a new request and make this one duplicate of it. Could you do that ? Thanks --- Additional comment from Jon Stanley on 2014-01-21 08:33:10 EST --- Sure thing. Since there's nothing different from this bug other than the maintainer, I'm just going to clone it. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773492 [Bug 773492] Review Request: ibsim - InfiniBand network simulator -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 4

[Bug 1119081] New: Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Sep '17

18 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081 Bug ID: 1119081 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 - Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: rjones(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/camlp4/ocaml-camlp4.spec SRPM URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/camlp4/ocaml-camlp4-4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b… Description: camlp4 is a pre-processor and pretty printed for OCaml. Prior to OCaml 4.02 it was part of the compiler, and indeed it has been included in Fedora for aeons. However it has now moved into a separate upstream project (albeit run by exactly the same people) so it seems better to have a separate Fedora package as well. NOTES: - There are no tarballs yet, but it is expected there will be upstream releases when OCaml 4.02.0 is out of beta. - You will only be able to build this against OCaml 4.02 from Rawhide. It is not buildable against earlier versions of OCaml. Fedora Account System Username: rjones -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 20

[Bug 1122073] New: Review Request: ocaml-labltk - Tcl/Tk interface for OCaml
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Sep '17

18 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122073 Bug ID: 1122073 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-labltk - Tcl/Tk interface for OCaml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: rjones(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/labltk/ocaml-labltk.spec SRPM URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/labltk/ocaml-labltk-4.02-0.1.beta1.fc20.s… Description: Tcl/Tk interface for OCaml Fedora Account System Username: rjones -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 12

[Bug 1028818] New: Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Sep '17

18 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028818 Bug ID: 1028818 Summary: Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic autocompletion for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pyplete.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pyplete-0.0.5-1.fc20.src.r… Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6163424 FAS: patches Description: PyPlete provides dynamic autocompletion for Python. It uses pysmell but unlike the standard version of it, PyPlete is dynamic, it does not need to execute a command to pre-analyze the code. It is useful for analyzing (or autocompleting) Python code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 15

[Bug 1067015] New: Review Request: instack-undercloud - Install an OpenStack undercloud via python-instack
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Sep '17

15 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067015 Bug ID: 1067015 Summary: Review Request: instack-undercloud - Install an OpenStack undercloud via python-instack Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jslagle(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/agroup/tripleo-rpm-spec-files/master/instack-undercl… SRPM URL: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack-m/openstack-m/fedora-20/SRPMS… Description: instack-undercloud is a collection of installation tools to install an undercloud via python-instack. It contains scripts and elements to complete the installation. Fedora Account System Username: slagle koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6547303 This is one of my first package submissions for Fedora, and I need a sponsor. I have a few more package review requests that I'll be submitting for the other OpenStack TripleO related projects. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

2 23

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review August 2014